The Biggest Buyer Disappears: The AI Capital Frenzy Is Reversing the 'De-Equitization' Cycle in US Stocks

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-06-15Обновлено 2026-06-15

Введение

"The AI capital surge is reversing a two-decade-long trend of 'de-equitization' in the U.S. stock market. According to JPMorgan, net equity supply could reach $1.5 trillion over the next two years, the strongest cycle since the late 1990s. Goldman Sachs forecasts net supply will rise from negative to around zero by 2026, ending a key structural support for stocks. This shift is driven by massive capital demands from the AI race, pushing companies from buybacks to large-scale equity issuance. Landmark events include SpaceX's record $75B IPO, with OpenAI and Anthropic poised to follow. Alphabet is planning an $85B share sale, emblematic of tech giants turning from net buyers to sellers. While retail investors and money market funds are seen as potential buyers, concerns are rising. Analysts warn that such concentrated, large-scale issuance historically coincides with investment frenzies and often precedes weaker market returns and increased volatility. The era of easy 'stock market QE' is over, with supply becoming a significant market headwind."

SpaceX completes its record-breaking $750 billion IPO, OpenAI and Anthropic are poised for massive IPOs, and Alphabet is planning an $85 billion stock offering.

JPMorgan calculates that net equity supply will reach $1.5 trillion in the next two years; Goldman Sachs expects net supply to return to zero from negative territory by 2026. The 'de-equitization' era that supported the two-decade-long bull market in US stocks is officially over, with supply shock potentially becoming a major market headwind.

SpaceX's record-setting listing, OpenAI and Anthropic's imminent mega IPOs, Alphabet's planned $85 billion stock issuance – a wave of equity financing comparable to the internet bubble era is sweeping across the US capital markets. A core structural driver that underpinned the US stock market's long bull run over the past two decades is quietly unraveling.

On June 15th, according to Bloomberg, JPMorgan's calculations show that over the next two years, after accounting for buybacks, IPOs, secondary offerings, and other stock issuances will inject a net new supply of approximately $1.5 trillion into the US stock market, marking the strongest net equity issuance cycle since at least the late 1990s.

Simultaneously, Goldman Sachs research indicates that the net equity supply in the US stock market may return to near zero by 2026 – a metric that has remained negative since 2003 and has been one of the most important structural supports for US stocks over the past twenty years.

The core logic behind this shift is: The massive capital demands fueled by the AI arms race are forcing companies to pivot from "buying back shares and shrinking the float" to "issuing equity on a large scale and raising funds from the public."

The era of de-equitization, once called the "QE for stocks," is over, and a new era of "re-equitization" is beginning. This means the long-overlooked variable of supply will once again become a key factor influencing market direction.

Two Decades of 'De-Equitization': The End of a Persistent Tailwind

For nearly two decades, the US stock market had a distinct structural feature: persistent shrinkage in stock supply. S&P 500 component companies alone have retired nearly $12 trillion in market capitalization through buybacks. Companies collectively played the role of the market's biggest buyer, while many high-quality firms chose to stay private for a long time, further shrinking the pool of investable assets in the public market.

Robert Buckland, former Citigroup strategist and proponent of the "de-equitization" concept, likened this phenomenon to "quantitative easing for the stock market." He noted that companies' continuous reduction of outstanding shares was a sustained factor providing systematic support for stock prices over the past twenty years.

However, this logic is being completely overturned by the AI wave. According to Citigroup data, net buyback volume by hyperscalers has already declined last year. StoneX Financial global macro strategist Vincent Deluard describes this transition as a three-stage evolution:

"First it's out of profit and free cash flow, then they start borrowing, and now it's all of the above -- cash flow, debt, and equity."

Goldman Sachs research shows that the net equity supply in the US stock market may return to near zero by 2026, after over two decades of being negative. Bespoke Investment Group macro strategist George Pearkes characterizes this as "late-cycle behavior" and bluntly states that "in that light, it's a pretty negative signal."

Super IPO Wave: SpaceX Leads the Charge, OpenAI and Anthropic to Follow

Last week, SpaceX completed the largest IPO in history, raising $75 billion (Note: Corrected figure; context suggests it's likely a typo in the original Chinese, as 750亿美元 is $75 billion, not $750 billion) and surging 19% on its first trading day. This is just the beginning.

Reportedly, about 160 companies have announced plans to raise over $120 billion through IPOs this year, surpassing the combined total of the past two years. Including secondary offerings by listed companies, new stock supply in the first half of this year has exceeded $360 billion, the highest in five years for the same period.

Mega IPOs by OpenAI and Anthropic are expected to follow in the coming months. According to Ned Davis Research estimates, SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic could collectively raise over $170 billion in the near term.

Notably, the initial float offered by these three companies is extremely low – SpaceX sold less than 5% of its equity, below the typical 15% to 20% for IPOs. Once lock-up periods expire and more shares enter circulation, the market will face an even larger supply shock.

Ned Davis Research calculates that floating just a small portion of the equity from these three companies would be enough to offset a full year of S&P 500 buybacks.

Blackstone President Jon Gray said the listings of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI mark a point where the IPO market has "really found its footing," revealing that Blackstone has had three portfolio companies go public this year, with seven more in the pipeline.

Alphabet Leads Secondary Offerings: Tech Giants Shift from 'Biggest Buyer' to 'Biggest Seller'

Running parallel to the IPO wave are large-scale secondary offerings by already-listed tech giants.

Alphabet is the most representative case. The Google parent, once a long-term major buyer of its own stock through buybacks, after heavily borrowing in markets like the US and Japan to fund AI expansion, is now further planning a stock offering potentially as large as $85 billion (Note: Corrected figure as per typical scale; 850亿美元 in the original text is likely a typo for $85 billion), potentially one of the largest secondary offerings in history. Meta and others are also evaluating equity financing to support AI spending plans.

The logic driving this shift lies in changing relative financing costs. With the S&P 500 trading at a price-to-earnings ratio of around 25, a rare high for this century, the cost of equity financing has become cheaper relative to debt financing.

Since the Fed pushed rates to a two-decade high in 2023, the advantage of stock yields (the inverse of the P/E ratio) over bond yields has widened, a dynamic that persisted even after the Fed began cutting rates. Aptus Capital Advisors portfolio manager John Luke Tyner puts it bluntly:

"It just feels like there are a lot of people tapping the market for money, and they're doing so, most likely, not because they think their stock is cheap."

Who Will Buy? Retail Investors and Money Market Funds as Key Variables

Facing this immense supply, the market's core question is: Who will buy?

For now, optimism remains dominant. According to Bloomberg, retail trading volume now accounts for about one-fifth of total US stock trading volume, double the level of 2010. SpaceX allocated a high 20% of its IPO shares to individual investors, above typical levels.

Man Group Chief Market Strategist Kristina Hooper characterizes current market sentiment as "FOMO (fear of missing out) meets fear, and more often than not, FOMO is winning out."

The nearly $7.9 trillion stockpile in money market funds is also seen as a potential source of buying power. Investors note it remains unclear when this flood of equity and debt issuance might start to upset the market's digestion.

However, the concentration of demand raises flags for some market watchers. Bianco Research President Jim Bianco points out:

"There is unlimited investor appetite for AI and unlimited willingness to finance, but outside of that, everyone else is basically treading water."

JPMorgan Global Investment Banking Co-Head Kevin Foley also concedes that current capital markets activity is "pretty concentrated" and warns that "the world can change quickly, and there are still risks out there."

Historically, large-scale equity issuance often accompanies major investment booms, from railroads and canals to telecom networks. But history also shows that such waves often end in bubbles.

BCA Research Chief US Equity Strategist Noah Weisberger, after studying 40 years of market history and about 12,000 IPOs, found that in the 12 months following large IPOs, the S&P 500 tends to underperform other periods, with a median gain of just 8%, and negative returns occurring in about 20% of cases.

"What's coming is a batch of extremely large IPOs, and that only heightens the concern that these aren't small issues that the market can quickly digest, they could be material headwinds for the market."

ValueWorks hedge fund founder Charles Lemonides compares the current situation to the late 1920s and the 1990s, when waves of innovation fueled speculative stocks and massive financing, "On the way up, companies are fighting to take the money, investors are fighting to give it, because it's a gold rush and everybody wants in."

Robert Buckland states plainly that he has been waiting for equity supply to truly start ramping up as a signal to fight this bull market. "Now, it's actually ramping up."

AllianceBernstein Co-Head of Institutional Solutions Inigo Fraser Jenkins takes a more moderate stance, arguing that rising equity issuance should be understood more as a risk factor that dampens future returns and increases volatility, rather than a fundamental, game-changing watershed. "It narrows the path to success in some ways."

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat core structural driver that supported the two-decade bull market in U.S. stocks is currently being dismantled according to the article?

AThe era of 'de-equitization' is ending. This refers to the long-term trend where companies acted as the largest net buyers of their own shares through massive buybacks, while many high-quality firms stayed private. This consistently reduced the supply of publicly traded shares, providing a structural tailwind for stock prices.

QWhat is the primary catalyst forcing companies to shift from buybacks to large-scale equity issuance, as described in the article?

AThe AI arms race is the primary catalyst. The enormous capital requirements for AI development and infrastructure are compelling companies—both new startups and established tech giants—to raise funds by issuing new equity (through IPOs and follow-on offerings) rather than shrinking their share count via buybacks.

QName two specific mega-IPOs mentioned in the article that are poised to follow SpaceX's record offering.

AThe article mentions that OpenAI and Anthropic are preparing for their own giant IPOs in the coming months, following SpaceX's $75 billion IPO.

QWhich major tech company is highlighted as shifting from being a major buyer to a potential major seller of its own stock, and what is the scale of its planned offering?

AAlphabet (Google's parent company) is highlighted. After years of being a large repurchaser of its own stock, it is now planning a follow-on stock offering of up to $85 billion, which could be one of the largest such offerings in history.

QWhat historical pattern does the article cite regarding the market performance following periods of large IPO volumes?

AResearch cited in the article shows that in the 12 months following large IPOs, the S&P 500 tends to underperform compared to other periods. The median gain is only 8%, and in about 20% of cases, returns are negative. This suggests such issuance waves often create headwinds for the broader market.

Похожее

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbit37 мин. назад

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbit37 мин. назад

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbit38 мин. назад

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbit38 мин. назад

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit1 ч. назад

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手1 ч. назад

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片