# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Stablecoin

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Stablecoin", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

RWA Weekly Report | US CFTC Launches Digital Asset Collateral Pilot Program, Spot Cryptocurrency Now Trading on CFTC-Registered Exchanges (12.3-12.9)

RWA Market Weekly Summary (Dec 3–9, 2025) The RWA market stabilized this week, with total on-chain Distributed Asset Value rising slightly to $18.44 billion. The number of asset holders increased by 6,130 to 561,558. Stablecoin market capitalization grew to $301.92 billion, with holders surging by 2.06 million to 207.75 million. U.S. Treasury tokenization slightly to $88 billion, while private credit rebounded to $22 billion. Key developments include the U.S. CFTC launching a digital asset collateral pilot program, allowing BTC, ETH, and USDC to be used as margin in regulated derivatives markets. The CFTC also approved spot cryptocurrency trading on its registered exchanges. U.S. lawmakers urged regulators to implement stablecoin rules under the GENIUS Act by July 2026. Meanwhile, former PBOC deputy governor Wang Yongli reiterated China's firm opposition to stablecoins, emphasizing the development of the digital yuan. In Europe, a consortium of banks plans to launch a euro stablecoin in 2026. South Korea's ruling party proposed a stablecoin bill requiring commercial banks to hold at least 51% ownership in issuers. The IMF warned that widespread stablecoin adoption could weaken central banks' monetary control. In project news, the SEC closed its investigation into Ondo Finance without action, and MSX (STONKS) reached a record $2 billion in daily trading volume.

Odaily星球日报Вчера 07:55

RWA Weekly Report | US CFTC Launches Digital Asset Collateral Pilot Program, Spot Cryptocurrency Now Trading on CFTC-Registered Exchanges (12.3-12.9)

Odaily星球日报Вчера 07:55

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is Stablecoin Leader CRCL Worth Buying? Why Can't High-Growth Earnings Drive the Stock Price?

"Circle (NYSE: CRCL), the issuer of USDC, has sparked intense debate in the crypto community following its Q3 2025 earnings report. Despite reporting strong growth—revenue up 66% YoY to $740 million and net income of $214 million, driven by a 108% increase in USDC circulation—its stock price fell significantly post-earnings and remains near its IPO price of $64. The core disagreement revolves around Circle’s business model and sustainability. Critics, including Jiang Zhuorer, argue that Circle operates like a bank, earning primarily through interest on reserve assets (mainly U.S. Treasuries), but is highly vulnerable to interest rate cuts. They highlight that ~60% of revenue is paid to distributors like Coinbase, leaving thin margins that could turn negative in a low-rate environment. They also warn of competition from traditional financial giants like JPMorgan and potential policy changes. Proponents, such as BTCdayu and qinbafrank, counter that Circle is building a long-term, network-driven infrastructure play. They compare it to Amazon or JD.com, arguing that current profit-sharing is a strategic cost to achieve scale, compliance advantage, and eventual market dominance in a winner-take-all industry. They believe USDC’s合规 (compliance) edge and institutional trust will drive adoption to multi-trillion dollars, outweighing interest rate risks. Short-term concerns include significant post-IPO lockup expirations adding selling pressure, and structural barriers like U.S. tax treatment of USDC as a property (not cash), hindering retail payment adoption. The debate encapsulates a clash between cyclical concerns (rates, costs, competition) and structural optimism (scale, compliance, network effects)."

Odaily星球日报Вчера 13:20

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is Stablecoin Leader CRCL Worth Buying? Why Can't High-Growth Earnings Drive the Stock Price?

Odaily星球日报Вчера 13:20

Tether's "Favorite Son" STABLE Crashes? Plunges 60% on First Day, Whale Jumping the Queue + No CEX Listing Sparks Trust Panic

Stable, a new Layer 1 blockchain heavily backed by Tether and Bitfinex, launched its mainnet and STABLE token on December 8. Despite significant pre-launch deposits totalling over $1.3 billion and strong market interest, the token’s first-day performance was highly disappointing. It opened around $0.036, briefly rose to nearly $0.046, then plummeted over 60% to a low of $0.015. Its fully diluted valuation (FDV) fell to $1.7 billion amid thin liquidity. The token’s not yet listed on major centralized exchanges like Binance or Coinbase, limiting its accessibility. The launch wass marred by controversy after a whale deposited hundreds of millions of USDT before the official start time, raising concerns about fairness and possible insider trading. This damaged trust in a project whose core narrative is transparency and reliability. Stable is designed as a stablecoin-focused chain with USDT as the native gas fee, aiming for a near gas-less user experience. It uses a custom DPoS consensus mechanism and is EVM-compatible. However, its tokenomics have raised concerns: STABLE tokens are used only for governance and staking, not fee payment, and 50% of the total 100 billion supply is allocated to the team, investors, and advisors with a one-year cliff. The project faces intense competition from established chains like Polygon, Tron, and Solana, as well as emerging stablecoin-specific L1s like Circle’s Arc and Paradigm-backed Tempo. Its success hinges on rapid execution, ecosystem development, and enterprise adoption planned for late 2025 to mid-2026. Early missteps and a lack of trust have cast doubt on its ability to compete.

marsbit19 ч. назад

Tether's "Favorite Son" STABLE Crashes? Plunges 60% on First Day, Whale Jumping the Queue + No CEX Listing Sparks Trust Panic

marsbit19 ч. назад

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is the Profit Moat of Stablecoin Leader CRCL Solid?

The article presents a heated debate surrounding Circle (NYSE: CRCL), the issuer of the stablecoin USDC, focusing on the sustainability of its business model following its IPO and Q3 2025 earnings report. Key bearish points, led by figures like Jiang Zhuo'er, argue that CRCL's profits are unsustainable. They compare it to a bank reliant on an interest rate spread, which is highly vulnerable to Federal Reserve rate cuts. Critics highlight that over 60% of profits are paid to distributor Coinbase, leaving CRCL with a thin margin. They warn that competition from traditional financial giants like JPMorgan could easily disrupt its model, and that its regulatory advantage is a temporary benefit, not a permanent moat. Bullish commentators, including @BTCdayu and @qinbafrank, counter that CRCL is a long-term infrastructure play, not a simple bank. They believe current profit-sharing is a strategic cost to achieve market dominance and network effects, similar to companies like Amazon in their early days. They argue that future growth from massive USDC adoption (potentially reaching trillions) will far outweigh the impact of falling interest rates. They see compliance as a powerful, long-term moat that will eliminate smaller competitors. Additional short-term concerns include a significant sell-off pressure from the post-IPO lockup expiration and a structural barrier to USDC's use in U.S. retail payments due to its classification as a taxable asset. In summary, the debate pits short-term cyclical risks (interest rates, high costs, sell pressure) against a long-term structural opportunity (market growth, network effects, compliance as a barrier to entry). The core question remains whether CRCL's current model is a fragile interest-rate play or a foundational bet on the future of digital currency.

比推17 ч. назад

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is the Profit Moat of Stablecoin Leader CRCL Solid?

比推17 ч. назад

From 'Stablecoin First Stock' to 'Ankle Cut' in Stock Price: Why Circle Quickly Fell from the Spotlight into a Revaluation Cycle

From "Stablecoin Unicorn" to "Ankle-Cut" Stock Price: Why Circle Quickly Fell from Its Peak into a Revaluation Cycle Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, experienced a dramatic stock price decline shortly after its IPO in June, dropping from an initial peak of around $260 to approximately $88. This reflects a broader market shift from hype-driven optimism to a more rational reassessment of the stablecoin industry. Multiple factors contributed to this sharp correction. Initially, the stock was significantly overvalued due to market enthusiasm for the "first stablecoin stock" and the high-interest environment that boosted the appeal of its reserve-backed revenue model. As early investors took profits and sentiment cooled, a price correction was inevitable. Increased competition is also pressuring Circle. While USDC is the world's second-largest dollar stablecoin, it faces growing challenges from new stablecoin projects and digital dollar initiatives from traditional financial institutions. The sector is shifting from an oligopoly to intense competition, raising investor concerns about USDC's future growth certainty. Furthermore, macroeconomic interest rate trends pose a fundamental risk to Circle's business model. Its core revenue comes from interest earned on the cash and short-term U.S. Treasuries backing USDC. Expectations that the Federal Reserve may begin a rate-cutting cycle could directly compress this income. Rising operational and distribution costs further squeeze profitability. Analysts hold divergent views on Circle's future. Firms like Mizuho have turned bullish, upgrading the stock and suggesting the sell-off related to its post-IPO lockup expiration may have created a buying opportunity. They point to USDC's continued adoption by mainstream financial institutions. Conversely, analysts at firms like Susquehanna remain pessimistic, maintaining an "Underperform" rating. They warn that lower future interest rates and potential underperformance in USDC growth could continue to pressure the stock price and have lowered their price target. The upcoming end of the post-IPO lockup period, which restricts insiders from selling shares, has added near-term selling pressure, but this is viewed by some as a temporary overhang. Circle's recent Q3 earnings report, which beat expectations for both revenue and profit, shows that these fundamental concerns have not yet materialized, leaving the company's trajectory highly dependent on future interest rates and its ability to maintain and grow USDC's market share amidst fierce competition.

cointelegraph_中文3 ч. назад

From 'Stablecoin First Stock' to 'Ankle Cut' in Stock Price: Why Circle Quickly Fell from the Spotlight into a Revaluation Cycle

cointelegraph_中文3 ч. назад

U.S. Stablecoin Regulatory Framework Finalized, Global Crypto Finance Enters New Institutionalized Phase

The United States has enacted its first federal regulatory framework for stablecoins, marking a pivotal moment for the global cryptocurrency industry. This framework transitions stablecoins from a state of fragmented oversight to a unified federal system, establishing clear legal definitions and operational standards for dollar-pegged payment stablecoins. Key provisions mandate that stablecoin issuers must hold high-quality liquid assets—such as cash and short-term U.S. Treasury securities—as reserves. They are also required to comply with strict auditing, transparency, risk management, and consumer protection rules. The regulatory structure adopts a dual approach: larger issuers will be overseen at the federal level, while smaller ones may fall under state jurisdiction. This development is expected to significantly enhance the role of stablecoins like USDC and USDT as critical infrastructure for cross-border payments, settlements, and decentralized finance (DeFi). By providing legal certainty, the framework is likely to encourage greater adoption by traditional financial institutions, payment companies, and fintech firms, integrating stablecoins more deeply into the mainstream financial system. However, the new rules also present challenges. Higher compliance costs and operational requirements may pressure smaller issuers and could lead to industry consolidation. The shift emphasizes regulatory-driven competition over innovation-driven growth. Furthermore, global regulatory disparities remain, as jurisdictions worldwide have differing definitions and standards for stablecoins, potentially creating friction in international flows. Overall, this U.S. regulatory move signals a structural shift from an enforcement-led approach to a rules-based system for digital assets. It is seen as a maturation of the industry, setting the stage for stablecoins to evolve from crypto trading tools into foundational components of the future digital financial ecosystem, including in cross-border trade, retail payments, and financial market settlements.

cointelegraph_中文2 ч. назад

U.S. Stablecoin Regulatory Framework Finalized, Global Crypto Finance Enters New Institutionalized Phase

cointelegraph_中文2 ч. назад

活动图片