# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Solana

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Solana", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

The On-Chain Game of Payment Giants: The Battle for a $40 Trillion Settlement Layer

The payment industry, while perceived as traditional, remains one of the earliest and most adaptable parts of the financial system to technological transformation. While the market continues to debate whether cryptocurrencies are assets, payment giants Visa and Mastercard have reached a consensus on a more fundamental issue: the need for a more efficient settlement layer that can integrate with existing payment systems, rather than requiring a complete overhaul. Their answer is stablecoins. Visa has begun integrating USDC stablecoin settlements via the Solana blockchain for U.S. banks, emphasizing standardization and productization rather than disruptive innovation. This allows for near-instant, 24/7 settlements, reducing liquidity constraints and transaction times, all while maintaining a seamless experience for end-users. Meanwhile, Mastercard is pursuing a multi-chain strategy, partnering with entities like Ripple and Gemini to build a flexible compliance layer that connects traditional finance with on-chain settlement networks. This approach prioritizes adaptability across various stablecoins and blockchain environments, particularly for cross-border and B2B payments. Both companies recognize that the real competition is not about individual stablecoin growth, but about controlling the future settlement layer—where an estimated $40 trillion in credit market activity could be redefined. The shift toward programmable settlement tools could reshape core financial processes like credit issuance and risk management. This transition is occurring quietly in the background—a technical migration that is gradual but likely irreversible. As major payment networks adopt on-chain settlement capabilities, blockchain is becoming embedded within the infrastructure of finance itself, changing the underlying logic of how value moves globally.

marsbit12/18 10:03

The On-Chain Game of Payment Giants: The Battle for a $40 Trillion Settlement Layer

marsbit12/18 10:03

The Brutal Reckoning of the Public Chain Market in 2025: The Thriving Casino, The Fake Ghost Town, and VC's Harvesting Scheme

Crypto Public Chains Face a Reality Check: A Grim Settlement in 2025 The crypto market, often perceived as a lens of soaring market caps and futuristic promises, reveals a starkly different reality when analyzed through on-chain fee data. A deep dive into DeFiLlama’s “Fees by Chain” metrics exposes a severe structural issue: the public chain ecosystem is dominated by profit concentration, while the long tail languishes in zombification. Notable examples highlight this disparity. Algorand, a chain backed by Turing Award-winning cryptography, recorded a meager $17 in daily protocol revenue despite a billion-dollar valuation. Similarly, Cardano, a top-ten asset by market cap, generates only around $6,000 in daily fees, indicating a lack of substantial economic activity beyond basic transfers. In contrast, the chains capturing real value are those serving clear, immediate demands. Tron leads with $1.24 million in daily fees, powered primarily by its role as a low-cost payment rail for USDT transfers. Solana follows with nearly $600,000, driven largely by its vibrant on-chain casino of meme coin trading and speculation. Base, backed by Coinbase’s distribution power, has also emerged as a serious contender. These cases underscore that proven, fee-generating business models in crypto are currently limited to payments, high-frequency speculation, and Ethereum’s role as a settlement layer. The analysis further reveals the failure of the VC-driven model. Newer chains like Sui, Sei, and Starknet, which launched with massive funding and high Fully Diluted Valuations (FDV), show alarmingly low daily fees—often in the low thousands or even hundreds of dollars. Their typical lifecycle involves attracting airdrop farmers with incentives, followed by a collapse in organic activity once subsidies end. This reflects a critical issue of “block space inflation”: too many chains have been built, without a proportional growth in killer applications that demand that capacity. The market is at an inflection point. Investors are shifting from valuing narratives to scrutinizing fundamentals. The new imperative is to identify chains that generate genuine, fee-based revenue from organic user demand—not those sustained by speculation, subsidies, or empty promises. This necessary清算 (settlement) in valuation may be painful, but it is essential for the industry's long-term health. The era of paying for dreams is giving way to an era of paying for proven utility.

marsbit12/18 04:08

The Brutal Reckoning of the Public Chain Market in 2025: The Thriving Casino, The Fake Ghost Town, and VC's Harvesting Scheme

marsbit12/18 04:08

活动图片