# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Security

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Security", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Abandoning Token Issuance, Abolishing veBAL: Can Balancer's 'All-or-Nothing Gamble' Bring Renewal?

Balancer, a veteran DeFi protocol, is undergoing a radical transformation following a major $120M security breach in November 2025 that accelerated its existing financial decline. With annual revenue of just $290K against a $2.87M operational budget, its DAO treasury was on track to be depleted within four years. TVL plummeted from a peak of $3B to under $160M. On March 23, 2026, the core team proposed two major overhauls: a tokenomics reform and an operational restructuring. The key strategy shifts from token emission-driven growth to a sustainable, fee-based model. Operational changes include dissolving Balancer Labs, reducing the team from 25 to 12.5 full-time equivalents, and cutting the annual budget by 34% to $1.9M. The protocol will focus solely on its core products: Boosted Pools, a revamped reCLAMM, and LBPs, while maintaining deployments only on Ethereum, Gnosis, Arbitrum, and Base. Tokenomics reforms are more drastic: BAL token emissions will stop immediately, and the veBAL governance system will be abolished. All protocol fees will now go entirely to the DAO treasury, and V3 protocol fees are reduced from 50% to 25% to attract LPs. A $500K compensation fund is allocated for veBAL holders. A crucial exit mechanism is proposed: a 12-week window, opening one year after the vote, allowing BAL holders to burn their tokens for stablecoins at a Net Asset Value (NAV) of $0.16 per BAL. If fully utilized, this could burn 35% of the circulating supply. The team projects that these changes could boost annual DAO revenue to $1.22M and extend the treasury's runway to 9 years. However, this survival depends heavily on the success of the streamlined operations and core products. This high-stakes gamble aims to secure a sustainable future for the protocol.

marsbit03/24 08:49

Abandoning Token Issuance, Abolishing veBAL: Can Balancer's 'All-or-Nothing Gamble' Bring Renewal?

marsbit03/24 08:49

AI Agent Economic Infrastructure Research Report (Part 2)

This report analyzes the AI Agent economy, focusing on OpenClaw—a local AI agent that operates autonomously across 20+ platforms like WhatsApp and Slack. It examines OpenClaw's technical architecture, including its message channels, security gateway, ReAct-based reasoning loop, and memory system, highlighting issues like context loss, security risks, and non-deterministic behavior. The study identifies key structural problems in the Agent economy, such as context immobility (locked to local machines) and the "coordination paradox" where multi-agent collaboration lacks trust and verifiability. It argues that crypto infrastructure (e.g., ERC-8004 for identity, x402 for payments) becomes essential only when agents operate across untrusted, cross-platform environments without pre-established trust—enabling micro-payments, decentralized reputation, and auditable logs. While traditional payment giants (e.g., Stripe, Visa) may dominate early adoption, crypto solutions could prevail in the long term due to their superiority in handling high-frequency, cross-border microtransactions and programmable permissions. The report concludes that infrastructure providers (e.g., those offering computation, routing, security) may capture more value than individual agents, and that "Product-Agent Fit" will replace traditional business models, shifting focus to API reliability, data structuring, and chain-verifiable service quality.

marsbit03/24 08:08

AI Agent Economic Infrastructure Research Report (Part 2)

marsbit03/24 08:08

Theft Is Just the Beginning: The Slow Collapse Behind Cyber Attacks

The article "Theft Is Just the Beginning: The Slow Collapse Behind Hacker Attacks" discusses the long-term impacts of cryptocurrency hacks beyond the initial financial loss. Based on Immunefi’s "2026 On-Chain Security Report," the analysis reveals that while attacks themselves are swift, the aftermath unfolds over months, causing prolonged damage such as declining token prices, reduced funding, halted hiring, and delayed development. Key findings include: - The median direct loss per attack is around $25 million, but tokens experience a median drop of 61% within six months, with 16% recovering to pre-attack levels. - Although the number of attacks remains steady (94 in 2024, 97 in 2025), the concentration of losses is alarming: the top five attacks accounted for 62% of total stolen funds. - Centralized platforms, though fewer in attack frequency, represent over half of the financial losses, highlighting persistent vulnerabilities in trusted intermediaries. The report emphasizes that the true crisis begins after the theft—projects face extended recovery periods, reputational harm, and operational disruption, making survival particularly challenging for less-resourced teams. The interconnected nature of DeFi ecosystems further amplifies risks, as single incidents can trigger broader market repercussions. Ultimately, the article underscores that resilience is not just about preventing hacks but enduring their prolonged secondary effects.

比推03/23 14:25

Theft Is Just the Beginning: The Slow Collapse Behind Cyber Attacks

比推03/23 14:25

活动图片