# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Investment

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Investment", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

The Silver Crisis: When the Paper System Begins to Fail

Silver Crisis: When the Paper System Begins to Fail In December, silver became the standout performer in the precious metals market, surging from $40 to over $60 per ounce, hitting a historic high of $64.28 on December 12 before experiencing sharp declines. Year-to-date, silver rose nearly 110%, far outpacing gold’s 60% gain. The rally appears justified by fundamental factors: expectations of Fed rate cuts, strong industrial demand from solar, EV, and AI sectors, and declining global inventories. However, the surge lacks stability. Unlike gold, which is backed by central bank purchases, silver has almost no official reserves, making it an isolated asset with low market depth and high volatility. The real driver behind the price spike is a futures squeeze. The market structure shifted into prolonged futures premium (contango), indicating either extreme bullish sentiment or deliberate market manipulation. Physical delivery demands surged on exchanges like COMEX and LBMA, exposing the fragility of the paper silver system—where paper claims vastly exceed actual physical silver. JPMorgan, a key player historically accused of silver market manipulation, now controls nearly 43% of COMEX silver inventories and acts as the custodian for major silver ETFs. Its influence over physical supply and delivery eligibility adds to market instability. The situation reflects a broader loss of confidence in financialized assets. Investors and central banks are increasingly shifting toward physical holdings, moving away from paper claims. This trend, coupled with declining Western gold and silver inventories and rising Asian demand, signals a structural shift in monetary and commodity markets. In essence, the rules of the game are changing. When the music stops, those holding physical metal will have a chair—everyone else may be left standing.

marsbit12/13 11:24

The Silver Crisis: When the Paper System Begins to Fail

marsbit12/13 11:24

Oracle Plunges 40%, Will Excessive AI Infrastructure Overbuild Drag Down Giants?

Oracle's stock has plummeted 40% from its September peak, despite securing over $500 billion in AI infrastructure orders, signaling that massive backlogs alone no longer assure investor confidence. Similarly, Broadcom, with a $73 billion AI order backlog, and CoreWeave, which recently landed $36 billion in deals with OpenAI and Meta, have also faced stock declines. The market is growing skeptical of the AI infrastructure boom, concerned not only about suppliers' ability to fund and deliver these projects but also about the financial health and commitment of their major clients—primarily tech giants like Meta, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, and Nvidia, alongside AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic. While giants have robust finances, they are increasingly relying on debt to fuel AI capex, with soaring expenditures on data centers straining cash reserves and free cash flow. For instance, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Amazon are projected to collectively invest $1 trillion over four years. However, AI still contributes minimally to their overall revenue, raising questions about the sustainability of using profits from core businesses to fund speculative AI expansions. Execution challenges—such as power grid limitations, cooling issues, and community opposition—further complicate timely deployment. The critical uncertainty remains: if exponential AI demand fails to materialize and monetize quickly enough, these vast investments could lead to underutilized infrastructure, massive losses, and a fundamental weakening of these tech titans. The race between AI infrastructure build-out and actual market payoff will determine whether this bet becomes a triumph or a disastrous overreach.

marsbit12/13 06:04

Oracle Plunges 40%, Will Excessive AI Infrastructure Overbuild Drag Down Giants?

marsbit12/13 06:04

a16z Bets on Energy Tokenization Experiment: How Will DayFi Use DeFi to Restructure the Power Grid? Jae 2025/12/13 12:00

a16z Backs Energy Tokenization Experiment: How DayFi Aims to Restructure the Grid with DeFi As global tech giants compete for computing power, electricity has become a critical resource. DayFi, a decentralized energy capital markets protocol under the Daylight ecosystem, is launching a $50 million pre-deposit event on December 16. Backed by a16z Crypto and Framework Ventures, DayFi tokenizes future electricity revenue into tradable crypto assets. The protocol allows users to deposit stablecoins to mint GRID—a fully collateralized stablecoin—and then stake it to receive sGRID, a yield-bearing token representing a share in energy asset revenue. This creates a flywheel effect: liquidity funds distributed energy projects, which generate tokenized returns for holders. However, DayFi faces significant regulatory challenges. sGRID may be classified as a security by the SEC, requiring strict disclosures. Additionally, FERC’s restrictions on disclosing critical energy infrastructure data conflict with DeFi’s transparency requirements. Technical solutions like zero-knowledge proofs may be needed to verify收益 without exposing sensitive data. Valuation of the underlying energy assets—solar panels, batteries—also remains uncertain, with risks of depreciation and potential manipulation. Despite these hurdles, DayFi represents an ambitious attempt to bridge DeFi with physical energy grids, transforming electricity into a dynamic, tradable asset amid growing AI-driven power demand.

marsbit12/13 05:42

a16z Bets on Energy Tokenization Experiment: How Will DayFi Use DeFi to Restructure the Power Grid? Jae 2025/12/13 12:00

marsbit12/13 05:42

Before the Bull Market Returns: Lessons I Learned in the Crypto World with Millions

Investment Lessons from the Crypto Market: A Reflection Before the Bull Run This article shares hard-earned lessons from losing millions in the crypto space, offering a sobering perspective on market behavior and personal psychology. The author begins by distinguishing between investment and speculation, noting that crypto is primarily driven by sentiment and tokenomics, not fundamentals. In bull markets, emotion dictates 60% of pricing, token distribution 30%, and fundamentals only 10%. This makes speculation far more profitable than value investing, which often leads to significant losses as holders refuse to cut losses, hoping for a recovery that never comes. A critical mistake is poor timing and position sizing. The author emphasizes the importance of maximizing risk exposure early in a trend's reversal—when uncertainty is high but odds are favorable—rather than during the euphoric peak when downside risk is severe. Examples from the AI meme season and the BSC rally illustrate how late entries often lead to missed opportunities or forced, high-risk bets. The piece also warns against traditional valuation metrics like P/E ratios and token buybacks, which assume sustainable earnings—a rarity in crypto where few projects survive long-term. Market leaders often change, and entire sectors are disproven. Ultimately, the author concludes that theoretical knowledge isn't enough; true understanding comes from painful, personal experience. The market's cyclical nature means many are doomed to repeat errors, but self-awareness and disciplined strategy are essential for survival and success.

marsbit12/12 13:21

Before the Bull Market Returns: Lessons I Learned in the Crypto World with Millions

marsbit12/12 13:21

活动图片