# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Governance

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Governance", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

6th Man Ventures Founder: How to Find the Most Valuable Crypto Projects?

Founder of 6th Man Ventures discusses the viability of the "dual-token + equity" structure, emphasizing that there is no one-size-fits-all answer. The key is backing an exceptional, long-term-focused team committed to building a founder-led, enduring enterprise, similar to Binance’s Changpeng Zhao. He argues that for application-layer projects requiring sustained leadership, tokens often underperform equity. Many DeFi 1.0 founders have departed, leaving DAOs and part-time contributors in "maintenance mode," struggling with slow and ineffective decision-making. In contrast, equity isn’t always superior—tokens enable unique utilities like fee discounts, staking for airdrops, and access rights, which equity cannot easily replicate. "Ownership tokens" currently face limitations in product integration and legal recognition in the U.S. due to regulatory gaps. However, a hybrid model is proposed: an equity entity operates on a "cost-plus" basis to serve a token-driven protocol, aiming to maximize token and ecosystem value rather than corporate profits. This structure benefits token holders with a well-funded Labs entity for development and a core team heavily incentivized via token holdings. Success hinges on trust in the team’s execution and vision, as token holders lack strong legal protections. Ultimately, team quality, credibility, and execution determine value. Over time, consistent delivery and clear value accrual to tokens—through buybacks, governance, and utility—will allow the best tokens to thrive by 2026, even with equity/Labs entities.

marsbit01/08 08:59

6th Man Ventures Founder: How to Find the Most Valuable Crypto Projects?

marsbit01/08 08:59

Who Defines the "Facts"? The Truth About Power and the Potential for Malice in Polymarket's Resolution Mechanism

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, faces renewed criticism over fairness following its intervention in a market regarding a potential U.S. invasion of Venezuela. On January 4, Polymarket issued a clarification stating that the U.S. operation to capture Venezuelan President Maduro did not qualify as an "invasion," causing a sharp drop in the value of "YES" shares for the event occurring by January 31 and impacting user profits. This is not the first such incident. The article explains Polymarket’s resolution mechanism, which relies on the oracle protocol UMA. Each prediction market has predefined rules, but Polymarket can issue additional clarifications for unforeseen events, as in this case. The resolution process requires a whitelisted address to propose an outcome with a security deposit. If unchallenged, it is accepted. If disputed, a debate and UMA token holder vote occur, with unbalanced incentives favoring the challenger to ensure proposal quality. The core issues are ambiguity in rule interpretation and the centralization of power. Rules are inherently interpretable, and platform neutrality is complicated by its U.S. base and geopolitical biases. Furthermore, the UMA voting mechanism, though economically incentivized, remains vulnerable to manipulation by large token holders, as seen in a past incident where a $7 million market was inaccurately resolved. Ultimately, users are not betting on real-world outcomes but on how rules will be interpreted and enforced.

Odaily星球日报01/08 03:55

Who Defines the "Facts"? The Truth About Power and the Potential for Malice in Polymarket's Resolution Mechanism

Odaily星球日报01/08 03:55

Visa Crypto Head: Eight Major Evolution Directions for Crypto and AI by 2026

Cuy Sheffield, Head of Crypto at Visa, outlines eight key themes for the evolution of cryptocurrency and AI by 2026, emphasizing a shift from theoretical potential to practical, reliable implementation. Cryptocurrency is transitioning from a speculative asset class into a high-quality technology. Its underlying infrastructure has become faster, cheaper, and more reliable, shifting its primary value from speculation to utility, particularly for payments and settlement. Stable币 are the clearest example of this, succeeding on objective merits like cost, speed, and global reach, and enabling adoption without ideological buy-in. As crypto becomes infrastructure, distribution capabilities and existing customer relationships—often held by large, regulated institutions—will matter more than pure technical novelty. For AI, the focus is shifting from raw intelligence to trust and reliability. AI agents are proving most valuable not as autonomous entities but as tools that reduce coordination costs in knowledge work—spanning research, analysis, and operations, not just coding. Their current limitation isn't capability but trust, requiring systems that are verifiable, consistent, and transparent. Successful AI integration is now a systems engineering challenge, relying on architecture, state management, and monitoring, not just model prompts. This development is creating a tension between the capital-intensive, centralized development of frontier models and the rapid iteration of open-source alternatives, leading to unresolved governance questions. Finally, the convergence of these fields is enabling new economic interactions. Programmable money, like stablecoins, is emerging as the native currency for AI agents, allowing for automated, fine-grained, and continuous payment flows between machines, opening the door to novel economic behaviors. The overarching trend is a move from flashy technological novelty to a focus on reliability, governance, and distribution, as both technologies become deeply embedded into real-world systems and workflows.

marsbit01/07 12:10

Visa Crypto Head: Eight Major Evolution Directions for Crypto and AI by 2026

marsbit01/07 12:10

From a $270 Billion Peak to a Flash Crash: DeFi Ventures into the Deep Waters of Financial Infrastructure

DeFi in 2025 experienced a dramatic rollercoaster, with Total Value Locked (TVL) surging to a historic peak of $277.6 billion before a sharp "10/11 Flash Crash" wiped out gains, ending the year with only a 3.86% increase to $189.35 billion. Despite volatility, key sectors evolved significantly: - **Staking** matured, with Ethereum securing over 30% of its supply, while Lido’s dominance declined to 24%. Restaking protocols like EigenCloud (TVL peak: $22B) and Ether.fi grew rapidly. - **Lending** hit a record $1.25T TVL, with Aave leading (>50% share). Shift from CDP (e.g., Maker) to money market protocols accelerated. - **DEXs** gained traction, capturing 21.71% of spot trades vs. CEXs at peak. Uniswap remained dominant, while Solana DEXs like HumidiFi challenged with low-fee models. - **Perp DEXs** like Hyperliquid ($3.55T volume) saw explosive growth, though competition intensified from Aster and Lighter. - **RWA** expanded, with tokenized assets exceeding $20B. BlackRock’s BUIDL fund grew to $1.75B, and tokenized commodities surged. - **Stablecoins** faced regulatory shifts (e.g., MiCA, GENIUS Act), with USDT and USDC leading. Yield-bearing stablecoins like Ethena’s USDe rose but later crashed, exposing systemic risks. The year highlighted DeFi’s growth into global financial infrastructure, alongside vulnerabilities in leverage and governance.

marsbit01/06 03:16

From a $270 Billion Peak to a Flash Crash: DeFi Ventures into the Deep Waters of Financial Infrastructure

marsbit01/06 03:16

活动图片