# Сопутствующие статьи по теме DeFi

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "DeFi", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Besides the Resolv Hack, This Type of DeFi Vulnerability Has Occurred Four Times Already

An attacker exploited a compromised off-chain signing key in the stablecoin protocol Resolv, minting 80 million USR tokens (pegged to USD) from a $100k–$200k USDC deposit within minutes. The stolen keys allowed unlimited minting due to a design flaw—lacking a minting cap—despite multiple audits. The attacker then converted USR to its wrapped version (wstUSR) and dumped it on DEXs, netting ~11,400 ETH (~$24M). This caused USR to depeg, trading at ~$0.25. The depeg triggered a second-phase crisis: lending markets (including Morpho and Fluid/Instadapp) using wstUSR as collateral relied on hardcoded oracles that priced it near $1 instead of its real market value. Arbitrageurs bought cheap wstUSR, used it as overvalued collateral to borrow stablecoins, and amplified losses. Fluid absorbed over $10M in bad debt; Morpho had 15 vaults exposed. This incident repeats a known DeFi pattern: similar oracle failures occurred with Usual Protocol (Jan 2025), Stream Finance (Nov 2025), and Moonwell (late 2025), where mispriced collateral led to massive bad debt. Critics highlight flawed incentives in the "curator" model (e.g., Gauntlet), where third-party vault managers prioritize high yields without adequate risk controls, and protocols outsource risk management without enforcing safeguards. The root cause is systemic: over-reliance on static oracles for volatile assets and insecure off-chain infrastructure.

marsbit03/24 12:10

Besides the Resolv Hack, This Type of DeFi Vulnerability Has Occurred Four Times Already

marsbit03/24 12:10

Abandoning Token Issuance, Abolishing veBAL: Can Balancer's 'All-or-Nothing Gamble' Bring Renewal?

Balancer, a veteran DeFi protocol, is undergoing a radical transformation following a major $120M security breach in November 2025 that accelerated its existing financial decline. With annual revenue of just $290K against a $2.87M operational budget, its DAO treasury was on track to be depleted within four years. TVL plummeted from a peak of $3B to under $160M. On March 23, 2026, the core team proposed two major overhauls: a tokenomics reform and an operational restructuring. The key strategy shifts from token emission-driven growth to a sustainable, fee-based model. Operational changes include dissolving Balancer Labs, reducing the team from 25 to 12.5 full-time equivalents, and cutting the annual budget by 34% to $1.9M. The protocol will focus solely on its core products: Boosted Pools, a revamped reCLAMM, and LBPs, while maintaining deployments only on Ethereum, Gnosis, Arbitrum, and Base. Tokenomics reforms are more drastic: BAL token emissions will stop immediately, and the veBAL governance system will be abolished. All protocol fees will now go entirely to the DAO treasury, and V3 protocol fees are reduced from 50% to 25% to attract LPs. A $500K compensation fund is allocated for veBAL holders. A crucial exit mechanism is proposed: a 12-week window, opening one year after the vote, allowing BAL holders to burn their tokens for stablecoins at a Net Asset Value (NAV) of $0.16 per BAL. If fully utilized, this could burn 35% of the circulating supply. The team projects that these changes could boost annual DAO revenue to $1.22M and extend the treasury's runway to 9 years. However, this survival depends heavily on the success of the streamlined operations and core products. This high-stakes gamble aims to secure a sustainable future for the protocol.

marsbit03/24 08:49

Abandoning Token Issuance, Abolishing veBAL: Can Balancer's 'All-or-Nothing Gamble' Bring Renewal?

marsbit03/24 08:49

活动图片