# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Competition

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Competition", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Going All-In on Arc: Circle Is Making a High-Stakes Gamble It Can't Afford to Lose

Circle, the issuer of USDC, is launching its own Layer 1 blockchain called Arc to address challenges in the stablecoin industry, particularly as interest rate cuts threaten its revenue model. Arc is designed for enterprise cross-border payments using stablecoins, offering sub-second finality, configurable privacy options, and transaction fees paid in USDC to avoid crypto volatility. It aims to reduce reliance on interest income and expand distribution channels. Despite partnerships with major firms like BlackRock and Visa, Arc faces competition from Tether and Stripe's Tempo, as well as challenges in attracting liquidity and regulatory scrutiny over privacy features. Circle's established reputation and payment network provide a competitive advantage, but the success of Arc is critical amid a shifting economic landscape.

比推01/09 17:56

Going All-In on Arc: Circle Is Making a High-Stakes Gamble It Can't Afford to Lose

比推01/09 17:56

To Hyperliquid: Stop Talking About 'Decentralization' and Learn from BNB's 'Strong Operations'

The article critiques Hyperliquid's overemphasis on "decentralization" and urges it to adopt a "strong operations" model akin to Binance's BNB ecosystem. It argues that the perpetual decentralized exchange (Perp DEX) market is saturated, with over 20 projects aiming for Token Generation Events (TGE) by Q1 2026, leading to intense competition. While Hyperliquid excels in liquidity and professional trading体验 for assets like BTC/ETH, its native token HYPE and HyperEVM ecosystem lack synergistic value capture, unlike BNB's integrated model. The author highlights that Binance’s success stems from its "listing effect" and operational synergy between Binance main站 and BNB Chain, which sustains project viability post-listing. In contrast, Hyperliquid’s minimalist, hands-off approach to HyperEVM has hindered ecosystem growth, causing projects to fail quickly after HYPE distribution. The piece suggests Hyperliquid should learn from BNB Chain’s "strong operations" to foster ecosystem collaboration, such as endorsing key DeFi sectors (e.g., lending, swaps), without compromising decentralization entirely. Ultimately, Hyperliquid’s engineering strengths are noted, but it must evolve beyond its current passive strategy to maintain competitiveness against rivals like Lighter and Aster, which are expanding into L2s/chains. The conclusion urges Hyperliquid to embrace complexity and operational rigor to secure long-term growth and token value.

marsbit01/09 07:12

To Hyperliquid: Stop Talking About 'Decentralization' and Learn from BNB's 'Strong Operations'

marsbit01/09 07:12

Will The GENIUS Act Shift $6.6T From US Banks? Critics Warn Stablecoin ‘Loophole’ Could Damage Small Businesses, Mortgages and More

A coalition of banking groups warns that a perceived "loophole" in the GENIUS Act could put up to $6.6 trillion in U.S. bank deposits at risk, potentially undermining community lending that supports small businesses, homebuyers, and local economies. The dispute centers on the Act’s ban on stablecoin issuers paying interest or yield directly to holders, which was intended to prevent stablecoins from competing with bank deposits. However, critics argue that some issuers are circumventing this by indirectly funding rewards through exchanges and partners. Banking associations, including the Bank Policy Institute, urge lawmakers to clarify that all forms of inducements—direct or indirect—should be prohibited. They warn that without this, stablecoins could incentivize customers to move savings out of banks, jeopardizing traditional lending. Crypto advocates and industry groups strongly reject these concerns, calling them a "last-ditch effort" by big banks to block competition. They argue there is little evidence that stablecoins threaten the banking system and that rewards benefit everyday users. Pro-crypto figures also warn that tightening the law could have geopolitical consequences, potentially pushing users toward foreign alternatives like China’s Digital Yuan. The stablecoin market, led by Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC, has grown to nearly $318 billion, partly driven by reward programs. Banking groups view these incentives as blurring the line between payment tools and deposit-like products, while crypto advocates see them as legitimate competitive features. If lawmakers restrict these rewards, the sector’s growth could slow significantly.

ccn.com01/08 10:55

Will The GENIUS Act Shift $6.6T From US Banks? Critics Warn Stablecoin ‘Loophole’ Could Damage Small Businesses, Mortgages and More

ccn.com01/08 10:55

2026 Neo Bank Outlook: Superform, Veera, Tria - The Three Titans Compete, Who Will Become the Alipay of the Crypto World?

By 2026, the onchain neobanking sector is rapidly evolving, with Superform, Veera, and Tria emerging as key players. These platforms combine DeFi functionality with traditional banking UX, enabling users to spend crypto seamlessly without CEXs while retaining self-custody. Superform focuses on yield optimization, automating cross-chain deposits to vaults across 7+ chains, boasting $144M TVL and 300% growth in six months. Veera, with 4M users across 108 countries, targets emerging markets with a browser-to-bank model, offering staking, rewards, and upcoming debit cards. Tria excels in chain abstraction, enabling frictionless spending with $1M daily transaction volume and $20M ARR, abstracting gas fees and cross-chain complexities. Risks include unsustainable yield subsidies, regulatory uncertainty (e.g., KYC requirements), and competition from MetaMask. Tria is poised for mainstream adoption due to its UX, Veera for emerging market dominance, and Superform for sustainable institutional growth. Together, they represent a new category of non-custodial financial super apps, driving crypto toward everyday usability.

marsbit01/08 08:44

2026 Neo Bank Outlook: Superform, Veera, Tria - The Three Titans Compete, Who Will Become the Alipay of the Crypto World?

marsbit01/08 08:44

A settled stablecoin issue is back on the table as Senate prepares vote

The U.S. Senate Banking Committee is set to mark up market structure legislation, reopening debate on whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer rewards—an issue previously addressed under the GENIUS Act. This reintroduces uncertainty in an area many believed settled. Supporters argue rewards are key for competition in payments, not financial stability, and warn restrictions could limit consumer choice as commerce moves onchain. Opponents' concerns over deposit drains from community banks are challenged by studies showing no meaningful impact. The outcome may affect the U.S. dollar's competitiveness globally, especially as other jurisdictions explore interest-bearing currencies. The markup will determine whether earlier compromises hold or if new restrictions emerge, impacting stablecoin adoption and use.

ambcrypto01/07 23:02

A settled stablecoin issue is back on the table as Senate prepares vote

ambcrypto01/07 23:02

Sumit Gupta Highlights Competition After 49 Crypto Exchanges Report FIU Registration

CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta emphasized the competitive nature of India's crypto market, noting that over 100 exchanges are still pending registration with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). This follows reports that 49 exchanges—45 domestic and 4 offshore—registered with the FIU in FY 2024-2025. India is strictly monitoring the sector, imposing penalties of approximately ₹28 crore on non-compliant platforms. The FIU, designated as the sole regulatory authority for virtual digital assets, requires exchanges to share financial accounts, appoint compliance officers, and conduct internal audits to mitigate money laundering and terror financing risks.

TheNewsCrypto01/06 08:28

Sumit Gupta Highlights Competition After 49 Crypto Exchanges Report FIU Registration

TheNewsCrypto01/06 08:28

"South Korea's Buffett" Plans to Acquire Korbit, Will South Korea's Fourth Largest Exchange Stage a Comeback?

South Korean financial giant Mirae Asset Group, led by chairman Park Hyeon-joo (known as the "Korean Buffett"), is in the process of acquiring a majority stake in Korbit, the country’s fourth-largest cryptocurrency exchange. The deal, valued between 70 million and 100 million USD, involves shares held by major stakeholders NXC (60.5%) and SK Planet (31.5%). Korbit, one of Korea’s earliest crypto exchanges, has seen its market share shrink to less than 1%, far behind dominant players Upbit and Bithumb. Despite a return to profitability in 2024, the exchange has faced years of losses and regulatory penalties, including a recent fine for compliance violations. The acquisition is seen as a strategic move by Mirae Asset to enter the digital asset space amid tightening regulations and intense competition. If completed, the deal could signal greater integration between traditional finance and crypto in Korea, though regulatory hurdles and market dominance by larger exchanges remain significant challenges.

marsbit01/03 03:40

"South Korea's Buffett" Plans to Acquire Korbit, Will South Korea's Fourth Largest Exchange Stage a Comeback?

marsbit01/03 03:40

Hyperliquid founder blocks market makers to keep the DEX ‘credibly neutral’

Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan has positioned the DEX as a "credibly neutral" platform, emphasizing integrity and fairness by blocking market makers, private investors, and protocol fees. This stance contrasts with recent controversy around Lighter DEX, which faced criticism for undisclosed market-making deals, including airdrops to entities like Jump Trading and Kelsier Labs. While Hyperliquid's market share has dropped from 75% to 19% amid rising competition, its token HYPE saw a slight price increase following Yan's remarks. The ongoing "perpetual DEX wars highlight tensions between transparency and traditional market-making practices in decentralized exchanges.

ambcrypto01/02 18:10

Hyperliquid founder blocks market makers to keep the DEX ‘credibly neutral’

ambcrypto01/02 18:10

Ethereum Overlooked by Wall Street

Ethereum experienced a significant "fundamental vs. price divergence" in 2025. Despite achieving major technical upgrades like Pectra and Fusaka, which enhanced scalability, and seeing explosive Layer 2 growth with Base chain's success, ETH's price dropped nearly 40% from its all-time high of $4900 to around $2900. A key reason was the Dencun upgrade (EIP-4844), which drastically reduced L2 transaction costs but collapsed fee revenue and ETH burning. This ended Ethereum's deflationary "ultrasound money" narrative, turning it into a mildly inflationary asset. While L2s like Base generated substantial revenue, they were seen as both a threat to L1 value capture and a source of long-term monetary premium for ETH. Ethereum faced intense competition, losing ground in areas like PayFi and DePIN to Solana, but maintained dominance in RWA (e.g., BlackRock's $2B BUIDL fund) and stablecoins. Wall Street remained cautious, with ETH ETF inflows ($9.8B) lagging behind Bitcoin's ($21.8B) due to the exclusion of staking rewards, making it less attractive as a yield-bearing asset. Potential catalysts for a turnaround include: the approval of staking-enabled ETFs, RWA expansion, a future surge in Blob demand, improved L2 interoperability, and upcoming upgrades like Glamsterdam and Verkle Trees aimed at enhancing scalability and decentralization. Ethereum is undergoing a painful transition from a retail-friendly platform to global financial infrastructure, sacrificing short-term gains for long-term, institutional-grade scalability and security.

marsbit01/02 08:28

marsbit01/02 08:28

Traditional Finance's On-Chain 'Open Conspiracy': Why the Crypto Embraced by Giants Is Doomed to Fail?

A warning that as traditional finance embraces blockchain, the specific form of crypto enthusiastically adopted by major financial intermediaries (exchanges, clearinghouses, banks, brokers) is likely to fail. Their approach is driven by a desire to preserve their own power and profits, not by the core principles of crypto. These institutions, with their monopolistic positions and lack of real competition, derive immense value from controlling the centralized "pipes" of the traditional financial system. Crypto represents a second, independent system built on decentralization, permissionless access, and anti-censorship—principles that inherently foster competition and threaten the entrenched dominance of these giants. When forced to adopt blockchain, these institutions will logically choose centralized, permissioned versions that allow them to retain control, rather than embracing the open, competitive nature of true decentralized networks like Ethereum. Their leadership, whose careers are built on centralization, will opt for solutions that protect their status quo. Therefore, the version of crypto they champion—a controlled, centralized mimicry—is destined to fail. The future of finance lies in a fundamentally different, decentralized architecture, not the repackaged old system.

marsbit01/02 07:22

Traditional Finance's On-Chain 'Open Conspiracy': Why the Crypto Embraced by Giants Is Doomed to Fail?