# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Capital

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Capital", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

The Divergence in Value Logic Between Eastern and Western Crypto KOLs

The article explores the fundamental differences in value logic between Eastern and Western crypto KOLs. The author, drawing from experience with venture capitalists in both regions, observes that Eastern perspectives focus heavily on practical, tactical aspects of projects—such as revenue models, tokenomics, and operational logistics—treating crypto ventures like traditional businesses. In contrast, Western narratives prioritize grand, aspirational stories capable of promising 10x to 100x returns, often glossing over practical details to attract major capital. This divergence leads to opposing definitions of "key opinion." Eastern KOLs tend to deconstruct and critically analyze, while Western ones build on ambitious, high-concept narratives aimed at securing large-scale investments. The author notes that although the most influential narratives and capital formations often originate from the West (e.g., restaking, Rollup, FHE), many of the industry’s most profitable ventures (like CEXs, DEXs, payment systems) are dominated by Eastern players. Structural factors, such as lower capital costs in the West due to institutional backing, and cultural differences—Eastern societies being more pragmatic and battle-tested—contribute to this divide. The author concludes that Eastern KOLs shouldn’t be seen as "degenerate" but as fundamentally oppositional in approach. Success, they argue, lies in challenging Western narratives with Eastern value logic, forcing the global conversation to engage with a more grounded, critical perspective.

marsbit01/16 10:06

The Divergence in Value Logic Between Eastern and Western Crypto KOLs

marsbit01/16 10:06

Give Freedom to Money: The Flow of Information from Binance to Twitter

"Freeing Money: The Flow of Information from Binance to Twitter" by Zuo Ye Web3 argues that in the crypto era, information has become a commodified asset, while financial flows and information streams are increasingly disconnected. The author observes that platforms like Binance, despite dominating the exchange ecosystem, are struggling with "separation anxiety" as they lose control over information dissemination and face stagnating user growth. The piece critiques the crypto industry’s shift from idealistic goals like decentralization to speculative meme-driven trading, where information quality declines even as quantity explodes. Binance’s aggressive meme marketing and attempts to capture链上 (on-chain) users reflect a broader industry anxiety: the breakdown between information flow and capital movement. The author proposes a "Quantity Theory of Crypto Information" — analogous to Irving Fisher’s monetary equation — where information supply multiplied by the velocity of viewpoints equals exposure per project multiplied by the total number of projects. Yet, effective information remains hard to quantify, and the relationship between influencer content and actual trading activity is often unclear. Despite the freedom of capital movement enabled by CEXs and crypto banks, information channels are becoming more closed, fragmented by language, region, and algorithms. The author concludes that the crypto industry, if it loses its ability to set agendas and relies solely on internal capital games, risks becoming an isolated island in the broader financial world — unless it evolves to embrace mainstream, large-scale productization, as perhaps envisioned by Elon Musk’s X.

marsbit01/15 06:39

Give Freedom to Money: The Flow of Information from Binance to Twitter

marsbit01/15 06:39

Matrixport Research: Trading Environment Persists, But a New Uptrend Cycle Still Awaits

Matrixport Research: Trading Environment Persists, But a New Uptrend Cycle Still Requires Patience Entering 2026, Bitcoin's market dynamics differ from typical early-cycle rebounds. While recent technical indicators show signs of recovery, suggesting a tactically more positive stance, structural signals for a sustained bull market remain insufficient. Historical patterns indicate that once the price falls below the one-year moving average, it often enters a more challenging phase. Coupled with weakening capital inflows, this cycle is more probable to transition into a market environment demanding selective opportunities and strict trading discipline. On-chain data reveals that long-term holders continue to distribute their holdings in an orderly manner. Following the launch of Bitcoin spot ETFs in early 2024, "super whales" initially increased purchases during the subsequent pullback but shifted to a net selling pattern since October 2024. This group has sold approximately $61 billion worth of Bitcoin cumulatively since then, maintaining net sales over the past 30 days. This selling pressure has been largely absorbed by mid-sized whales, resulting in price action characterized by back-and-forth consolidation within a high range rather than a typical parabolic top or panic selling. A core constraint of this cycle is the lack of incremental capital. The 30-day net change in Bitcoin's Realized Cap has been declining since its peak in late 2024. Despite multiple price rebounds in 2025, the underlying fund flows had already weakened. This divergence explains the previous unsustainable rallies and indicates that the current rebound is built on a fragile foundation of capital. Furthermore, growth in new addresses has slowed, indicating a lack of new, large-scale investor participation. The price is currently near the True Market Mean Price (TMMP), suggesting limited willingness for new buyers to chase the price higher. Historically, sustained upward movements require the price to break significantly above the TMMP, confirmed by synchronized capital inflows. Without this, the price is more likely to oscillate near the TMMP. In conclusion, while the technical repair allows for a tactically positive outlook, this uptick should be viewed as a tactical rebound rather than the start of a new structural bull cycle. Bitcoin still faces core constraints like insufficient capital inflows and ongoing selling by super whales, which will likely cap upside potential. The market is expected to offer periodic, trade-specific opportunities rather than a smooth trending market. In this environment, risk management and discipline should take precedence over long-only buy-and-hold strategies.

marsbit01/09 09:53

Matrixport Research: Trading Environment Persists, But a New Uptrend Cycle Still Awaits

marsbit01/09 09:53

活动图片