# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Assets

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Assets", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

U.S. Crypto Regulatory 'Civil War' Ceasefire: A Turning Point in the Decade-Long Power Struggle Between SEC and CFTC

For over a decade, the U.S. cryptocurrency industry has operated under regulatory uncertainty, with two key questions unresolved: what exactly are crypto assets, and which agency should regulate them? The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have long held overlapping and conflicting claims over crypto oversight, creating a "regulatory fog" that hindered innovation and pushed businesses to more predictable jurisdictions. Recently, signs of change have emerged. The SEC introduced a new classification framework in November 2025, categorizing digital assets into four types—digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, and tokenized securities—acknowledging that not all crypto assets are securities. More significantly, the SEC and CFTC signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to enhance coordination in areas like crypto regulation, investor protection, and federal policy. Although non-binding, the MOU signals a move toward resolving jurisdictional conflicts and creating an "adaptive regulatory framework" tailored to digital assets. This shift is partly a response to global competition, as other financial centers develop clearer crypto regulations. Additionally, the growing integration of crypto with traditional finance—through stablecoins and real-world asset tokenization—demands a more structured regulatory approach. If successful, these efforts may lead to a unified federal framework, ending long-standing ambiguities and positioning the U.S. to better compete in the evolving digital financial landscape.

marsbit03/13 10:54

U.S. Crypto Regulatory 'Civil War' Ceasefire: A Turning Point in the Decade-Long Power Struggle Between SEC and CFTC

marsbit03/13 10:54

Gas Fees and Transaction Security: Avoiding Asset Drainage by Malicious Contracts

Blockchain transactions require gas fee as fuel, but malicious actors exploit this mechanism to drain assets through deceptive practices. Common traps include: 1) Unlimited token approvals, where users grant open-ended access to smart contracts, enabling unauthorized transfers; 2) Gas fee hijacking, where attackers manipulate transaction parameters or embed infinite loops to force excessive gas payments; 3) Fake approvals/transactions via phishing sites that mimic legitimate dApps to steal assets. Key preventive measures: - Apply minimal approval principles, authorizing only necessary token amounts and revoking unused permissions. - Manually set gas limits and prices using wallet advanced settings, avoiding defaults during high network congestion. - Verify contract addresses, transaction details, and DApp authenticity before confirming any transaction. - Use separate wallets for daily interactions and large holdings to isolate risks. If compromised: - Immediately freeze the wallet and revoke all suspicious approvals. - Preserve evidence (TxID, contract addresses) and report to platforms. - Seek professional assistance for large losses—avoid paying "recovery fees" (common secondary scams). Recommended tools: Approval checkers (e.g., Revoke.cash), block explorers (Etherscan), and real-time alert systems. Stay vigilant by scrutinizing every transaction and rejecting unsolicited links.

marsbit02/28 14:34

Gas Fees and Transaction Security: Avoiding Asset Drainage by Malicious Contracts

marsbit02/28 14:34

活动图片