# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Airdrop

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Airdrop", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Weekly Editor's Picks (0321-0327)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0321-0327) by Odaily Planet Daily features in-depth analyses from the past week. Key topics include: **Macro & Geopolitics:** The article analyzes why oil prices remain above $100/barrel despite a 400-million-barrel strategic reserve release, citing Iran-related supply disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. It discusses the economic impact of the Iran conflict, parallels with Ukraine, and how bond market volatility—not just oil—is reshaping monetary policy expectations. **Investment & Startups:** Balancer proposes major tokenomics reforms and operational restructuring after a $120M exploit, shifting from token emission-driven growth to a revenue-focused model. **Web3 & AI:** ERC-8183 is highlighted as a key protocol for decentralized AI agent economies, structuring task-based commerce on-chain. Another piece argues that AI agents won’t kill SaaS; instead, proprietary data and entrenched workflows will remain crucial moats. **Prediction Markets:** Polymarket’s liquidity incentives and fee structure are examined, noting that only 2% of users generate 90% of volume. Profitable strategies include sports betting, crypto market-making, and high-conviction trading. **Policy & Stablecoins:** The proposed U.S. CLARITY Act may redefine stablecoins as payment tools (not savings products), potentially negatively impacting DeFi tokens like UNI while benefiting compliant entities like Circle. Also included are airdrop guides, Ethereum L2 developments, and weekly highlights like Tether’s audit progress and regulatory updates.

marsbit03/28 03:07

Weekly Editor's Picks (0321-0327)

marsbit03/28 03:07

The Last Time I'll Talk About Backpack, and Also Discussing My Airdrop Farming Principles

The author outlines two primary approaches to airdrop farming (referred to as "撸毛"): a labor-intensive" method of mass participation in many projects, and their own "sniper" method. The sniper approach relies on a rigorous four-point checklist to filter projects and avoid "industrial garbage." The checklist evaluates: 1. **Team (People):** Founders must be intelligent, have strong execution skills, and be genuinely well-intentioned. This is assessed through their social media content and, if possible, personal interactions. 2. **Product (Product-Market Fit):** The product must have a clear market fit, be delivered competently, and the team must show a responsible attitude towards its quality, avoiding releases full of basic errors. 3. **Narrative (Story):** The project should operate in a promising, unproven narrative within Web3 that also aligns with major investment trends in Web2 (e.g., AI). 4. **Timing & Cost (Market Conditions):** Avoid participating when market sentiment is overly FOMO-driven and participation costs are high. If an opportunity causes hesitation, it's best to skip it, as overcrowded airdrops yield minimal or negative returns. Applying this framework, the author explains why they avoided heavily farming the Backpack exchange airdrop: * **Narrative:** They are skeptical of the "compliant CEX" narrative, questioning its unique selling point against giants like Binance and OKX. * **Product:** They criticize Backpack's frequent technical failures, rollbacks, and what they perceive as a lack of product development rigor, comparing it unfavorably to competitors like Hyperliquid. * **Timing & Cost:** The participation cost was high compared to zero-fee alternatives available at the time. The author concludes that Backpack lacks the technical and operational prowess of a serious exchange and views its token more as a "VC-backed meme coin" for secondary market speculation rather than a worthwhile airdrop target.

比推03/23 20:38

The Last Time I'll Talk About Backpack, and Also Discussing My Airdrop Farming Principles

比推03/23 20:38

TGE in a Bear Market: Is Backpack the Starting Point or the End?

Backpack, a prominent Solana ecosystem wallet and centralized exchange, conducted its TGE (Token Generation Event) for the BP token on March 23. The total supply is set at 1 billion tokens, with 25% (250 million) unlocked at TGE—24% for points holders and 1% for Mad Lads NFT holders. No team or investor tokens are in the initial circulation. The tokenomics are designed to prevent insider dumping: founders, employees, and investors receive no direct token allocation. Instead, the team’s share is held in a company treasury, locked until at least one year after a future IPO. Tokens are released based on key milestones like regulatory progress and product expansion. Users could claim tokens by completing TGE verification on Backpack platform. The project implemented strict anti-Sybil measures, including KYC and manual confirmation requirements, reclaiming over 50 million "fake points." Backpack introduced a staking-to-equity mechanism: users staking BP for at least one year can convert tokens into company shares, with 20% of equity allocated to stakers. Market predictions from Polymarket suggest an FDV between $100-200 million at launch, aligning with Backpack’s previous $120 million valuation. The project has raised $17 million in Series A funding and is reportedly negotiating a new round at a $1 billion pre-money valuation. Amid a bear market, Backpack’s TGE is a significant test of market confidence and project sustainability.

比推03/23 08:33

TGE in a Bear Market: Is Backpack the Starting Point or the End?

比推03/23 08:33

The 4 Truths and Fee Traps Behind Polymarket's LP Market Making Incentives

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, has recently shifted its focus to incentivizing liquidity providers (LPs) to address its core issue of low liquidity. While most markets remain free, it now charges a taker fee on specific markets like crypto price movements and select sports events. This fee, highest near 50% probability, funds new LP reward programs. There are two primary reward systems: one pays LPs when their limit orders are executed (maker rewards), and another rewards simply for placing orders within a set spread to provide liquidity, even if they don't get filled. A third mechanism allows anyone to sponsor additional incentives for specific markets. A positive view argues this structure values genuine liquidity over mere trading volume, making fees earned and rewards received a potential key, anti-sybil metric for a future POLY token airdrop. It rewards users who improve market depth and stability. A contrasting, negative view claims the LP program is a "trap." Critics argue that professional market makers avoid it due to insider trading risks and that most LPs are actually losing money due to hidden "LP wear and tear" (impermanent loss), only participating based on speculation of a valuable airdrop. They warn that if Polymarket expands fees to fund these unsustainable rewards, it could lose its competitive edge of zero fees and better odds compared to traditional sportsbooks. Proposed solutions include a fixed fee only on profits, using a native POLY pool for liquidity, or charging for premium products like parlays instead of core markets.

marsbit03/22 04:10

The 4 Truths and Fee Traps Behind Polymarket's LP Market Making Incentives

marsbit03/22 04:10

The 4 Truths Behind Polymarket's LP Market-Making Incentives and the Fee Trap

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, has recently shifted its incentive structure towards rewarding Liquidity Providers (LPs) to solve its core problem of low market depth. While most markets remain free, it now charges a taker fee on specific markets (all Crypto markets, NCAAB basketball, and Serie A football) to fund new LP reward programs. The fee is calculated on a symmetric curve, highest near 50% probability. The platform has introduced two main incentive systems: one rewards LPs whose limit orders are executed (Maker Incentives), and another rewards LPs simply for providing resting liquidity, even if orders aren't filled (Liquidity Incentives). A third system allows anyone to sponsor additional rewards for specific markets. A key argument is that the fees paid and rewards earned could be a strong anti-sybil metric for a potential POLY token airdrop, valuing genuine liquidity provision over mere trading volume. However, a counter viewpoint argues the LP program is a potential trap. Critics claim that the displayed ROI for LPs is misleading as it doesn't account for "LP wear and tear"—losses from filled orders that can't be easily exited. They state professional market makers avoid it due to insider trading risks and that the model of subsidizing liquidity with massive daily rewards is unsustainable. The concern is that widespread fee implementation could erase Polymarket's competitive edge over traditional betting platforms. Proposed solutions include a fixed fee on profits only, using a POLY token for native liquidity, and charging for premium products like parlays instead of core markets.

Odaily星球日报03/22 04:08

The 4 Truths Behind Polymarket's LP Market-Making Incentives and the Fee Trap

Odaily星球日报03/22 04:08

活动图片