Stripe Rises, PayPal Falls: The New King of Payments Ascends the Throne

Odaily星球日报Опубликовано 2026-04-01Обновлено 2026-04-01

Введение

Stripe, the global payments infrastructure giant, has surged to a $159 billion valuation, marking a 74% increase, while announcing $1.9 trillion in annual transaction volume. Concurrently, legacy leader PayPal is exploring a potential sale after reporting stagnating growth, with Stripe considered a possible acquirer. Stripe’s success stems from strategic expansion beyond payment APIs into crypto and AI-driven finance. It acquired stablecoin infrastructure firm Bridge and wallet provider Privy, and co-developed the Tempo blockchain, capable of 100k TPS. Its partnership with OpenAI introduced machine payments for AI agents, positioning Stripe at the forefront of AI economy transactions. In contrast, PayPal faces declining growth in core checkout services and minimal traction with its PYUSD stablecoin. Its traditional fee-based model conflicts with emerging stablecoin economies, and slow innovation has left it vulnerable to competitors. The divergence highlights a fundamental shift: Stripe is building the next-generation financial infrastructure—on-chain payments, stablecoin settlement, and AI commerce—while PayPal struggles to adapt within its existing framework. The payment industry’s future lies in embracing crypto and AI, and Stripe’s early bets have given it a decisive advantage.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010)

On February 24, 2026, the global payments industry witnessed two landmark "turning point events":

First, Stripe announced a new round of tender offer financing at a valuation of $159 billion, with joint investment from institutions like Thrive Capital, Coatue, and a16z, a staggering 74% increase from its $91.5 billion valuation a year ago. On the same day, Stripe's co-founders Patrick and John Collison released their 2025 public letter, reviewing $1.9 trillion in annual transaction volume on the Stripe platform—a 34% year-over-year increase, accounting for approximately 1.6% of global GDP.

Second, was the latest news from the "former payments霸主 (overlord)" PayPal: According to Bloomberg, PayPal is contacting potential acquirers, with at least one major competitor evaluating a potential acquisition. The news sent PayPal's stock soaring intraday by 9.7%, closing up about 5.76%, making it the top gainer in the S&P 500 that day (Odaily Planet Daily Note: even as the three major indices fell across the board).

It's worth noting that, according to subsequent Bloomberg reports, Stripe is considering acquiring all or part of PayPal's business. Interesting, right? The former's positive news is its soaring valuation; the latter's positive news is that "finally, a big buyer is willing to take me."

This is not just an episode in the story of two payment giants, but more like a dividing line about "who saw the next era."

Stripe's Infinite Game: The Operating System for the "Financial Internet"

If your understanding of Stripe is still stuck at "a company that makes payment APIs," you're at least three years behind.

Looking back at Stripe's business performance in 2025, its achievements are evident: 90% of companies in the Dow Jones index and 80% of companies in the Nasdaq 100 index use Stripe; almost all top AI companies—OpenAI (ChatGPT), Anthropic (Claude), Cursor, Midjourney—use Stripe for their payment infrastructure; 25% of new companies registered in Delaware, known as the "heartland of American innovation, are created through Stripe Atlas (Odaily Planet Daily Note: a B2B company registration service platform). In 2025, 20% of Atlas startups completed their first charge within 30 days of incorporation, a figure that was only 8% five years ago.

An important driver behind these achievements is undoubtedly Stripe's deep strategic layout in the crypto payments and on-chain finance business line.

The Collison brothers wrote a line in their public letter that forces deep thought across the entire payments industry and even the crypto market: "It might be a crypto winter now, but it's definitely a stablecoin summer." Data confirms this judgment—in 2025, Bitcoin's price fell about 50% from its high, but stablecoin trading volume reached an unprecedented $34 trillion; payment volume doubled to approximately $400 billion, with about 60% coming from B2B payment scenarios.

The reality is that in 2025, the growth data for stablecoin adoption officially decoupled from the price volatility of crypto assets.

Stripe placed a heavy bet before this inflection point arrived:

In October 2024, it acquired stablecoin infrastructure company Bridge for approximately $1.1 billion, the company's largest single acquisition ever. Post-acquisition, Bridge's transaction volume grew by over 4 times; In July 2025, it acquired crypto wallet infrastructure company Privy, which supports over 110 million programmable wallets;

In September 2025, it co-incubated Tempo, a Layer 1 blockchain designed for payments, with Paradigm. The mainnet officially launched in March 2026, supporting over 100,000 TPS and sub-second settlement. Visa, Shopify, Mastercard, Anthropic, OpenAI, Revolut, and others have already integrated.

Thus, Stripe built its own stablecoin ecosystem—stablecoin backend infrastructure Bridge, wallet frontend application Privy, and underlying settlement system Tempo—intertwining vertically and horizontally, spanning a closed-loop ecosystem for stablecoin issuance, custody, and settlement.

Looking further ahead: Stripe also co-developed the Agent Commerce Protocol (ACP) with OpenAI, launching Machine Payments—allowing developers to charge AI Agents directly for API calls, settled via stablecoin micro-payments. This is a payment scenario that never existed before. Stripe's judgment is direct: When AI Agents start making purchasing decisions for humans, whoever controls the payment channel抢先 (seizes first) the core lifeline of the AI economy.

Stripe's Foresight: Letting the Entire Payments Industry Copy Its Homework

How far ahead Stripe's布局 (layout) is can be seen by the actions of its peers.

In March 2026, Mastercard announced the acquisition of stablecoin infrastructure company BVNK for up to $1.8 billion, Mastercard's largest acquisition ever in the digital assets space. Mastercard's Chief Product Officer Jorn Lambert was frank: "We expect that, over time, most financial institutions and fintech companies will offer digital currency services."

Note the phrase—"will offer." Stripe is already offering them, and has been for a full year and a half. The timeline for this battle over stablecoin infrastructure is laid out here:

October 2024: Stripe acquires Bridge;

May 2025: Visa makes a strategic investment in BVNK;

2025: Coinbase negotiates to acquire BVNK for about $2 billion, but the deal ultimately falls through;

March 2026: Mastercard acquires BVNK for $1.8 billion. The entire traditional payments industry is only scrambling to buy this ticket in 2026, which Stripe had already purchased in 2024.

Additionally, another industry anecdote: Airwallex founder Jack Zhang previously revealed that as early as 2018, Stripe made a $1.2 billion offer to acquire Airwallex—at that time, Airwallex's annual revenue was only about $2 million, corresponding to a valuation of approximately 600 times revenue. This means that in cross-border payments, Stripe saw something others hadn't as early as 2018.

Foresight is never just one correct judgment, but a sustained ability to perceive trends.

PayPal's Old Dilemma: When the Former Overlord Gets Lost in the New Age of Navigation

Now, let's look at PayPal.

To summarize the history of this former giant in one sentence: Born in 1998 in the golden age before the dot-com bubble burst, PayPal quickly became the default payment method for eBay e-commerce, an early pioneer of internet finance. But the more glorious the history, the more starkly it highlights the harsh present reality: PayPal is losing momentum across the board, and it's happening precisely in the areas where it was once most proud.

For the full year 2025, PayPal's net revenue was $33.2 billion, with growth of only 4.3%, lower than 2024's 6.8%, continuing to decline. Core direct checkout business grew only 4% for the year, dropping to 1% in Q4, a cliff-like fall from 7% a year ago—behind this number is the comprehensive erosion of PayPal's core territory by Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, and Adyen. Q4 transactions per active account decreased by 5% year-over-year, and the total number of active accounts stagnated around 439 million.

In February 2026, after the Q4 earnings release, the stock price plummeted over 20% in a single day. CEO Alex Chriss subsequently stepped down, and new CEO Enrique Lores took over on March 1st. Management's statement on the earnings call was: "Our execution has not been at the level it should be."

The PYUSD card was once PayPal's biggest bet to enter the on-chain world, but reality dealt it a harsh slap: Launched in August 2023, its current market capitalization is less than $4 billion, with a market share of less than 0.5%, almost negligible compared to USDT and USDC, and even surpassed by the later entrant USD1.

Only recently, after nearly 3 years, has PayPal expanded PYUSD to about 70 markets globally—this move itself isn't wrong, but on a track where competitors have been racing ahead for nearly two years, the first-mover advantage is already meaningless.

More致命 (fatally), the "early bird catches the worm, but PayPal's late arrival" reflects a fundamental矛盾 (contradiction) hidden beneath its surface business: PayPal's business model relies on "revenue from funds flow fees," while the stablecoin business model relies on "earning interest on Treasury bonds from settled assets." There is a natural conflict between these two logics—every time PayPal promotes a PYUSD stablecoin payment, it is, to some extent, cannibalizing its own traditional fee revenue.

This is a problem that is difficult to solve within PayPal's existing business framework.

The Battle of the New and Old "Kings of Payment": Who is Building New Infrastructure, Who is Repairing Old Pipelines?

Looking at the two companies together, the node of their diverging fates lies not in a single product decision, but in the截然不同 (starkly different) answers they gave to the question: "What is the next step for payments?"

PayPal's answer was to make its existing payment services better. Venmo monetization, BNPL business, PYUSD expansion—these actions themselves are not problematic, but they are repairs within the existing framework, not bets on the next paradigm.

When stablecoins appeared, PayPal's reaction was "let's issue a stablecoin too"; and when the AI wave arrived, PayPal's reaction was "add a more convenient and quick function button on the checkout page."

A leaf obscures the sight of Mount Tai. PayPal's disappointment was perhaps destined when management and the entire company chose to defend their turf rather than pursue disruptive innovation.

In contrast, Stripe has never been confined to existing standard answers, instead constantly seeking better solutions.

Faced with the proposition of "the future state of payments," Stripe's answer is to redefine payment itself: Starting from seven lines of code for收款 (payment acceptance), it built all the way to stablecoin orchestration (Bridge), crypto wallets (Privy), a payment-specific blockchain (Tempo), and an AI Agent Commerce Protocol (ACP)—each step is not about grabbing market share in the existing payments market, but about building the foundation for the next era of finance and payments.

The Collison brothers wrote in their 2025 annual summary public letter: "Our best guess is that the acceleration in 2025 is the beginning of a larger inflection point in entrepreneurship and creativity driven by large language models."

Behind this sentence lies a clear judgment—they are not just operating a payment company, but laying the financial foundation for the next internet era.

In their view, the entire industry will eventually move towards on-chain payments, stablecoin settlement, and the AI Agent economy; there is not much dispute about this anymore. The difference lies only in: Who is building this road, and who is waiting for the road to be built before getting on it.

Stripe chose the former, and did so nearly two years ahead of its peers. PayPal's current situation is that of a company with massive scale, healthy cash flow, but one that is half a step behind the trend of the times—it doesn't lack the cards for a comeback, but the time window left for it is narrowing.

Of course, we must affirm that PayPal is not a "bad company." It has 439 million active accounts, Venmo's social payment基因 (genes), nearly $2 trillion in annual transaction volume, and a business model that still generates real cash flow. But in the new payments era, these assets are more like a底牌 (trump card) that needs to be reactivated, rather than an impregnable moat.

Every technological paradigm shift in history has swept a large number of "taken-for-granted giants" into the dustbin of history. PayPal now faces precisely such a question it must answer: Do you continue to be a seemingly better, yet实际上 (actually) complacent PayPal, or do you strive锐意进取 (with determination and enterprising spirit) to become the payment infrastructure of the next era?

The answer determines fate.

Recommended Reading:

Stripe 2025 Public Letter (Official Original Text)

Stripe Official Press Release: Tender Offer and Annual Update

Stripe is Building the Tempo Blockchain

Stripe Considers Acquiring PayPal

Mastercard Acquires BVNK for Up to $1.8 Billion

PayPal Q4 2025 Earnings, CEO Departure

In-Depth Analysis of PayPal's 2025 Performance

Airwallex Founder Discloses Rejecting $1.2 Billion Stripe Acquisition

Mastercard Plans to Acquire BVNK for Up to $1.8 Billion

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat were the two major milestone events in the global payments industry on February 24, 2026, as described in the article?

AFirst, Stripe announced a new tender offer round at a valuation of $159 billion, a 74% increase from its $91.5 billion valuation a year prior. Second, it was reported that PayPal was in talks with potential acquirers, with at least one major competitor evaluating a buyout.

QWhat key strategic acquisitions did Stripe make in 2024 and 2025 to build its stablecoin ecosystem?

AIn October 2024, Stripe acquired stablecoin infrastructure company Bridge for approximately $1.1 billion. In July 2025, it acquired crypto wallet infrastructure company Privy, which supports over 110 million programmable wallets.

QAccording to the article, what fundamental conflict exists within PayPal's business model regarding its stablecoin, PYUSD?

APayPal's traditional business model relies on earning revenue from transaction fees on the flow of funds. In contrast, a stablecoin business model typically profits from earning interest on the assets backing the stablecoin. Therefore, every PYUSD payment promoted by PayPal potentially cannibalizes its own core transaction fee revenue.

QWhat new payment concept did Stripe develop in collaboration with OpenAI, and what is its significance?

AStripe collaborated with OpenAI to develop the Agent Commerce Protocol (ACP), which enables Machine Payments. This allows developers to charge for API calls directly from AI Agents, settled via stablecoin micro-payments. It represents a novel payment scenario and positions Stripe to control a critical payment channel in the emerging AI agent economy.

QHow does the article characterize the fundamental difference in strategy between Stripe and PayPal regarding the future of payments?

AThe article states that PayPal's strategy focuses on improving existing payment services within its current framework (e.g., Venmo monetization, BNPL, PYUSD expansion). In contrast, Stripe's strategy is to redefine payment itself by building the foundational infrastructure for the next era, including stablecoin systems, a dedicated blockchain (Tempo), and protocols for AI commerce, rather than just competing for existing market share.

Похожее

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

"SK Hynix Chinese Staff Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts" Driven by the AI boom, South Korea's SK Hynix is experiencing record performance, with media reports predicting massive year-end bonuses for its employees, making them highly desirable in the matchmaking market. However, this prosperity starkly contrasts with the situation for the company's Chinese employees. According to reports, SK Hynix operates under a rule allocating 10% of operating profit for employee bonuses. While projections suggest Korean employees could receive bonuses reaching millions of RMB, a Chinese employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed the disparity: "If they get 3 million, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that." After adjustments based on KPI ratings, this employee's highest bonus was slightly over 100,000 RMB. Bonuses are paid annually in Korea but semi-annually in China. During the industry downturn in 2023-2024, Chinese employees received no bonus at all. The gap extends beyond bonuses. Recruitment posts for SK Hynix's Chinese factories (in Wuxi, Dalian, Chongqing) show engineer monthly salaries ranging from 10,000 to 35,000 RMB, with a 13th-month salary promised. Chinese employees also receive standard benefits like annual leave but lack stock incentives, which are reportedly unavailable to them. Furthermore, management positions in China are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though industry observers note a gradual increase in local middle managers over time. SK Hynix has confirmed the 10% bonus rule but cautioned that specific future bonus amounts remain unpredictable. The company forecasts strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products for the next 2-3 years, driven by AI infrastructure investment. This focus on business-to-business markets may continue to constrain supply for consumer products, potentially prolonging price increases for components like memory.

链捕手9 мин. назад

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

链捕手9 мин. назад

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbit30 мин. назад

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbit30 мин. назад

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbit37 мин. назад

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbit37 мин. назад

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

MicroStrategy's executive chairman, Michael Saylor, clarifies the company's recent announcement that it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC digital credit product. He emphasizes this does not make MicroStrategy a net seller of Bitcoin. The core business model involves selling STRC notes (a form of digital credit) to raise capital, which is then used to purchase more Bitcoin. Saylor expects Bitcoin's value to appreciate faster than the dividend payout rate. Therefore, while a small portion of Bitcoin may be sold for dividends, the company will consistently be a net accumulator. For example, in April, the company raised $3.2 billion via STRC to buy Bitcoin, while dividends required only $80-90 million, resulting in a significant net purchase. Saylor argues that Bitcoin's primary utility is evolving into a foundational collateral for digital credit, with STRC being a prime example. He notes that STRC now constitutes a majority of the U.S. preferred stock market due to its high yield and favorable risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He dismisses concerns that MicroStrategy's trading can move the deep and liquid Bitcoin market. Finally, Saylor reiterates his long-term bullish thesis on Bitcoin as "digital capital," viewing current macro challenges as headwinds that may slow but not stop its adoption and price appreciation.

Odaily星球日报48 мин. назад

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

Odaily星球日报48 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片