Solana vs Ethereum – $4.4T traded, RWA holders flipped – But who wins?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-08Обновлено 2026-03-08

Введение

Solana's trading activity has surged over three years, accumulating $4.4 trillion in total volume. Weekly trading, once below $10 billion, grew significantly in 2024, often reaching $20–40 billion and briefly spiking to $120–130 billion during memecoin-driven speculation. It has since stabilized around $12–15 billion, reflecting sustained retail demand due to its low-fee structure. In Real World Assets (RWA), Solana surpassed Ethereum in holder count (154,942 vs. 153,592), indicating broader retail accessibility. However, Ethereum leads in RWA value ($15.45B vs. $1.79B), maintaining its role as the institutional hub. Despite high trading volume, Solana's liquidity is thinner (0.4 liquidity-to-volume ratio vs. Ethereum’s 4.57), making it efficient for small trades but challenging for large orders. It benefits from $15.4B in stablecoin supply and high throughput with minimal fees. Ethereum retains a structural advantage with deeper liquidity and institutional settlement capabilities.

Solana’s trading activity has expanded sharply over the past three years, accumulating roughly $4.4 trillion in total token trading volume.

Early periods showed modest weekly activity, often remaining below $10 billion. This phase reflected the network’s early adoption stage.

However, momentum accelerated through 2024 as weekly turnover climbed steadily. Activity frequently moved into the $20–$40 billion range.

That shift signaled rising participation across decentralized trading venues and memecoin ecosystems built on Solana.

Later, volatility intensified as several weeks recorded dramatic surges. At the peak, trading volume briefly reached about $120–$130 billion.

These spikes aligned with speculative bursts and memecoin-driven liquidity cycles across the Solana ecosystem.

Yet the surge proved temporary, and activity cooled afterward. Weekly volumes gradually compressed, indicating that speculative enthusiasm faded while core usage persisted.

As of press time, the network generated roughly $12–$15 billion in weekly trading volume. This level remains significantly higher than early-cycle activity.

Thus, the trajectory reveals a hybrid structure.

Speculative spikes amplify short-term volume, while stabilized baselines suggest that Solana’s low-fee architecture continues attracting persistent retail trading demand.

Solana overtakes Ethereum in RWA holders

As Solana’s [SOL] trading activity expands, tokenized RWAs provide another lens into how its ecosystem is evolving beyond speculative markets.

Participation data begins to reveal shifting adoption dynamics across major networks.

Ethereum [ETH] still leads in capital concentration, securing roughly $15.45 billion in RWAs across 675 assets. This scale reflects strong institutional issuance and established financial integrations.

However, wallet distribution presents a different perspective.

Solana recorded roughly 154,942 RWA holders, slightly exceeding Ethereum’s 153,592 holders. This crossover suggested broader retail accessibility within Solana’s infrastructure.

At the same time, Solana’s total RWA value remained lower at around $1.79 billion, indicating an earlier stage of capital deployment.

Elsewhere, participation declines sharply.

BNB Chain [BNB] hosts roughly 39,218 holders, while Polygon records about 15,482 users.

Taken together, the structure suggests Ethereum remains the institutional hub, while Solana increasingly functions as a retail gateway for tokenized financial assets.

Volume surge test Solana’s liquidity resilience

Solana’s trading surge signals strong activity, yet underlying liquidity reveals a more complex structure.

DeFiLlama data showed $6.53 billion in TVL supporting $14.96 billion in weekly DEX volume. This produces a 0.4 liquidity-to-volume ratio, far thinner than Ethereum’s 4.57 benchmark.

As a result, smaller trades execute with minimal slippage, reinforcing Solana’s appeal among retail traders.

However, larger orders still encounter shallow depth, where price impact rises quickly during demand spikes.

On top of that, roughly $15.4 billion in stablecoin supply supported more than 60% of trading pairs.

This stablecoin liquidity helped maintain continuous market activity across Solana-based exchanges.

Meanwhile, the network processed roughly 3.4K transactions per second while Average Transaction Fees stayed below $0.00025.

Yet Ethereum preserves a structural edge through $160 billion in stablecoins and expanding RWA liquidity, suggesting a layered market where Solana drives trading velocity while Ethereum anchors institutional settlement.


Final Summary

  • Solana continues attracting strong retail trading activity as weekly volumes stabilize near $15 billion, though liquidity depth remains thinner than Ethereum’s institutional capital base.
  • Ethereum retains structural dominance through deeper stablecoin and RWA liquidity.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the peak weekly trading volume reached on Solana, and what was the primary driver behind such spikes?

AThe peak weekly trading volume on Solana briefly reached about $120–$130 billion. These spikes aligned with speculative bursts and memecoin-driven liquidity cycles across the Solana ecosystem.

QWhich blockchain currently has more holders of Real World Assets (RWA), and what does this suggest about its user base?

ASolana currently has more RWA holders with roughly 154,942, slightly exceeding Ethereum's 153,592. This suggests broader retail accessibility within Solana’s infrastructure, while Ethereum remains the institutional hub.

QHow does Solana's liquidity-to-volume ratio compare to Ethereum's, and what are the implications for traders?

ASolana has a liquidity-to-volume ratio of 0.4, which is far thinner than Ethereum’s benchmark of 4.57. This means smaller trades on Solana execute with minimal slippage, appealing to retail traders, but larger orders encounter shallow depth and greater price impact during demand spikes.

QWhat is the current approximate weekly trading volume on Solana, and how does it compare to its early activity?

AAs of press time, Solana generates roughly $12–$15 billion in weekly trading volume. This level remains significantly higher than its early-cycle activity, which often remained below $10 billion weekly.

QWhat key advantage does Ethereum maintain over Solana according to the final summary of the article?

AAccording to the final summary, Ethereum retains structural dominance through deeper stablecoin and RWA liquidity, anchoring institutional settlement.

Похожее

Cerebras IPO: A $48.8 Billion Valuation—Is the 'Nvidia Challenger' a Bubble or a New King?

Cerebras Systems, positioning itself as an NVIDIA challenger, is going public with a $48.8 billion valuation despite several underlying paradoxes revealed in its S-1 filing. While 2025 revenue grew 76% to $510M and GAAP net income was $237.8M, this profitability relies heavily on a one-time, non-cash accounting gain. Adjusting for this, the company's non-GAAP net loss actually widened to $75.7M. Furthermore, customer concentration remains extreme: 86% of 2025 revenue came from two Abu Dhabi-based entities, MBZUAI (62%) and G42 (24%). Its landmark deal with OpenAI, valued at over $20 billion, creates a complex, nested relationship where OpenAI is simultaneously a major customer, lender, warrant holder, and strategic partner with exclusivity clauses. Cerebras's technical edge in latency-sensitive AI inference is real, with its wafer-scale chip outperforming competitors in benchmarks. However, this advantage is confined to a specific niche, not the broader AI training market dominated by NVIDIA's CUDA ecosystem. With a 95x price-to-sales ratio, the valuation demands flawless execution of the OpenAI contract and massive future revenue growth. Key long-term risks include intense competition from giants like NVIDIA and AMD, a dual-class share structure granting insiders near-total voting control, and ongoing geopolitical uncertainties regarding export controls. The IPO is a pivotal capital markets event for AI infrastructure. As an investment, it represents a high-risk, high-reward bet on the "inference-first" narrative and Cerebras's ability to dominate its specialized segment, underpinned by a valuation that highlights the current fervor in the sector.

marsbit23 мин. назад

Cerebras IPO: A $48.8 Billion Valuation—Is the 'Nvidia Challenger' a Bubble or a New King?

marsbit23 мин. назад

What Happens to Ethereum Developer Tools After the Grants Run Out?

On February 27th, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) announced Project Odin, a structured sustainability support program designed for a select group of strategic, previously grant-funded teams. Unlike a standard grant, Odin offers a long-term advisory mechanism focused on helping these teams establish credible, sustainable paths within a two-year framework, thereby reducing long-term dependence on single funding sources. The program addresses a critical post-grant challenge: how essential public goods, especially major developer tools, can achieve financial sustainability beyond initial funding. While grants from EF and programs like Gitcoin or RetroPGF remain vital for startups and research, they often fall short for mature, widely-used infrastructure. Tools like compilers, languages, and network stacks are deeply embedded but struggle with monetization, trapped between being too foundational to lose and too public to generate natural revenue. Project Odin provides teams with a dedicated Strategic Advisor to guide them through a three-phase process: 1) analyzing current funding and realistic options, 2) validating potential paths with stakeholders, and 3) executing plans, which may include crafting support contracts, service agreements, or other recurring revenue models. The first pilot participant is Vyper, a critical smart contract language for the EVM, highlighting the need for sustainable models for core infrastructure. The initiative reframes the public goods conversation from "who should be funded" to "how do already-proven teams avoid perpetual funding crises?" It encourages ecosystem participants—protocols and projects that depend on these tools—to view sustainable support not just as charity, but as essential risk management for their own operational supply chains.

marsbit52 мин. назад

What Happens to Ethereum Developer Tools After the Grants Run Out?

marsbit52 мин. назад

MARA Reports Q1 Revenue Below Expectations, Net Loss of $1.3 Billion, Stock Plunges After Hours

Bitcoin mining firm MARA Holdings reported disappointing Q1 2024 results, causing its stock to erase all daily gains and fall 3.44% in after-hours trading. Revenue dropped 18% year-over-year to $174.6 million, missing Wall Street estimates of $192.7 million. The company posted a net loss of $1.3 billion, a significant increase from a $533.4 million loss a year ago, primarily driven by unrealized losses on its holdings of 38,689 Bitcoin, which depreciated in value during the quarter. MARA also sold over 15,100 BTC in late March to repurchase debt at a discount. The broader mining environment remains challenging due to a 35% decline in Bitcoin's price from its all-time high and a nearly 30% increase in mining difficulty over the past year. MARA's market cap ranking among U.S. miners has slipped to seventh. Critically, the company announced a strategic pivot away from Bitcoin mining expansion. It stated it has no plans to purchase new mining equipment and is fully transitioning toward AI data centers. Its strategy involves retrofitting existing mining sites for AI and high-performance computing (HPC) and leveraging its recent $1.5 billion acquisition of Long Ridge Energy & Power, a gas-fired power plant and data center. This infrastructure could eventually support 600 MW of AI compute capacity, allowing MARA to redeploy up to 90% of its non-custodial mining power for AI and IT workloads.

marsbit52 мин. назад

MARA Reports Q1 Revenue Below Expectations, Net Loss of $1.3 Billion, Stock Plunges After Hours

marsbit52 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на SOL (SOL) представлены ниже.

活动图片