Silicon Valley's New Darling Clawdbot: When Local AI Agents Learn to 'Go On-Chain', What Happens?

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-31Обновлено 2026-01-31

Введение

A new open-source project called Clawdbot (now renamed Moltbot) has gained attention in Silicon Valley. It enables an AI agent to run locally on a user’s computer or server, allowing it to browse the web, click buttons, send messages, and even execute transactions automatically. Unlike cloud-based models like ChatGPT, Clawdbot is self-hosted, open-source, and operates across multiple platforms such as Telegram, WhatsApp, Discord, and Slack. It features persistent memory and can perform tasks via browser automation, command-line operations, and scripts—making it a persistent digital assistant. In the context of Web3, Clawdbot could significantly lower barriers to participation by automating complex and repetitive on-chain operations. Potential use cases include 24/7 monitoring of liquidation thresholds, automated yield reinvestment, cross-chain transactions, and strategy execution via natural language commands. However, the integration of such agents with Web3 also introduces serious risks. Recent incidents include fake token launches under Clawdbot’s name and security vulnerabilities from misconfigured servers. To mitigate risks, users are advised to grant minimal wallet permissions—preferably read-only—use dedicated small-cap wallets with strict limits, and avoid unofficial token promotions. Self-hosting does not guarantee security; improper configuration may expose sensitive data and execution privileges. The agent should serve as an assistant, not a custodian. Any perm...

In recent weeks, an open-source project called Clawdbot has suddenly become popular in Silicon Valley circles. Although it has now been renamed Moltbot, its core concept remains unchanged: to have an AI agent reside on your local computer or server, capable of browsing web pages, clicking buttons, sending messages, and even helping you automate trades.

Once such "24/7 online AI employees" integrate with Web3, the imagination space turns into a new question: Is it a productivity tool, or a machine that could potentially access your assets at any time?

Clawdbot: Executable Agents

Unlike cloud-based ChatGPT, which only supports conversations, Clawdbot has several key features:

  • Self-hosted and open-source: Pull the code and run it directly on your own machine or VPS, with data by default not leaving the local environment.
  • Multi-channel access: Can integrate with chat tools like Telegram, WhatsApp, Discord, Slack, etc. You give instructions via chat, and it helps you actually click web pages, call APIs, and run scripts in the background.
  • Persistent memory: Not "ask and answer then forget," but capable of remembering tasks, preferences, and context you've previously assigned, like a long-term virtual colleague.
  • Direct "hands-on" capability: Through browser automation, command lines, scripts, etc., it can actually execute tasks, such as clearing emails, booking flights, or running trading strategies.

This means Clawdbot can become a digital agent for long-term hosted tasks. And what Web3 needs is precisely this kind of "executable agent."

Lowering the Barrier to Web3 Participation

Current pain points in Web3 essentially revolve around complexity and continuity, typical examples being cumbersome on-chain operations, massive information noise, and high interaction frequency.

An individual's attention and operation time are objectively limited. While Web3 narrates "infinite possibilities," at the execution level, it is already very limited for individuals: you simply cannot monitor the market 24/7, nor be familiar enough with every protocol to avoid checking documentation.

If local AI agents like Clawdbot are connected to wallets, block explorers, and DeFi interfaces, they are naturally suited to handle these key scenarios:

  • 24/7 monitoring and alerts: Help you watch liquidation lines, price ranges, LP impermanent loss, and governance voting deadlines.
  • Automation of multi-chain repetitive actions: Such as periodic reinvestment of yields, cross-chain replenishment, and rebalancing positions.
  • Strategy implementation: You describe strategies in natural language, and the agent translates them into specific contract calls and trading paths.

If the past decade was about humans learning to use wallets and contracts themselves, the next decade will likely be about humans learning to use agents to help them use wallets and contracts.

Local AI agents like Clawdbot will gradually become key players in resolving the contradiction between "information explosion + execution consumption" in Web3 scenarios.

How to Mitigate Risks?

Clawdbot has recently experienced incidents of counterfeit token issuance and scams using its name, forcing the founder to publicly state "this is a scam." Meanwhile, security companies have pointed out that many people do not know how to configure servers properly, exposing the agent to the public internet, leading to risks of API abuse, chat logs, and even execution permissions.

In the context of Web3, several bottom lines must be clarified—

1. Exercise extreme restraint with wallet permissions; use read-only whenever possible.

2. If signing permissions must be granted, only grant them to "small-amount dedicated wallets" with strict limits and whitelists.

3. Do not believe in "official tokens" or "official announcements combining Web3 with Memes." Clawdbot has already been used to issue fake assets, following the classic pump-and-dump curve—first surging then plummeting 90%—completely exploiting emotions and information asymmetry.

Additionally, self-hosting does not automatically mean security. If you set up your own server without proper firewall and access controls, it is equivalent to throwing an "AI root权限" that can execute commands directly onto the public internet. This is not enhancing privacy; it is building a landmine.

Finally, while automatically executing agent assistants and their integration with Web3 are indeed full of imagination, as soon as wallets and signatures are involved, it is no longer a toy to experiment with casually but a machine that can access your assets at any time. The permissions you grant it are not technical details but life-and-death boundaries.

More realistically, if an agent used as a "notebook" or "secretary" is compromised, what is leaked is not just a few mnemonic phrases but your behavioral轨迹, asset habits, and social relationships from the past few years—equivalent to digitally packaging and handing over your entire self.

The truly safe approach is to always remember one thing: agents can be assistants, but never custodians. Use read-only whenever possible, prioritize alerts, and any permission beyond your intuitive comfort zone is worth hesitating over再三.

*This content is for reference only and does not constitute investment advice. The market carries risks, and investment requires caution.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is Clawdbot (now called Moltbot) and what are its key features?

AClawdbot, now renamed Moltbot, is an open-source AI agent designed to run locally on a user's computer or server. Its key features include being self-hosted and open-source, offering multi-channel access through platforms like Telegram and Discord, maintaining persistent memory to remember tasks and context, and being capable of executing actions such as automating web browsing, calling APIs, and running scripts.

QHow can a local AI agent like Clawdbot potentially benefit Web3 participants?

AIt can lower the barrier to entry in Web3 by automating complex and repetitive tasks. This includes providing 24/7 monitoring for alerts like liquidation lines, automating multi-chain actions such as periodic yield reinvestment, and translating natural language strategies into smart contract calls and transaction paths.

QWhat are some of the major security risks associated with using such an AI agent in a Web3 context?

AMajor risks include the potential for wallet compromise if excessive permissions are granted, the danger of servers being misconfigured and exposed to the public internet, and the threat of phishing scams or fake tokens being promoted under the agent's name. A breach could lead to loss of assets and exposure of sensitive personal data and behavioral history.

QWhat security precautions does the article recommend for using an AI agent with a cryptocurrency wallet?

AThe article recommends exercising extreme caution with wallet permissions: use read-only access whenever possible, if signing permissions are necessary, dedicate a small-cap wallet with strict limits and whitelists, and never treat the agent as a custodian of assets. The core principle is to grant minimal necessary permissions.

QAccording to the article, what is the fundamental rule for safely using an executable agent that can interact with Web3?

AThe fundamental rule is that an AI agent should always be an assistant, never a custodian. Users should remember that it is a machine capable of moving their assets, and any permission granted beyond their intuitive comfort zone should be heavily scrutinized. The mantra is:能只读就只读,能提醒就先提醒 (can read-only, read-only; can remind, remind first).

Похожее

Anthropic's IPO Launch: Commercial Miracle or Valuation Bubble?

Anthropic has confidentially filed for an IPO, led by Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, potentially going public by October. Following its latest $650 billion funding round, its pre-IPO valuation stands at $965 billion, with projections reaching up to $2 trillion at listing, which would make it the highest-valued private company ever. The article, written by Fu Sheng, addresses skepticism that this represents an AI bubble akin to the 2000 dot-com crash. It argues the current situation differs fundamentally. Unlike the internet bubble era, which relied on speculative narratives with little revenue, Anthropic's valuation is backed by unprecedented, measurable financial performance. Key data points include: * **Revenue Growth:** ARR skyrocketed from $10 billion in early 2025 to $470 billion by May 2026, targeting $100 billion by year-end—a growth curve unmatched in business history. * **Profitability:** It achieved operating profitability in Q2 2026 with an estimated $5.6 billion profit. * **Efficiency:** With ~3,000 employees and ~$470 billion ARR, its revenue per employee exceeds $10 million. Products like Claude Code, launched less than a year ago, already generate $25 billion in annualized revenue. * **Enterprise Adoption:** It boasts a strong enterprise client base, with 8 of the Fortune 10 and over 1,000 large firms spending over $1 million annually on Claude. The valuation is framed using a traditional SaaS model (e.g., a 10x Price-to-Sales multiple on $100 billion revenue). The author contends the core question for analysts has shifted from "How big could this be?" to "How much is it earning and will earn next quarter?" The discussion extends beyond Anthropic to a broader paradigm shift: the transition from a "carbon-based" to a "silicon-based" economy. Companies are increasingly prioritizing investment in compute and AI capabilities over human resources, as these directly scale productivity and competitive advantage. Anthropic's IPO is thus positioned not just as a corporate milestone, but as a price anchor for this new economic era.

链捕手1 ч. назад

Anthropic's IPO Launch: Commercial Miracle or Valuation Bubble?

链捕手1 ч. назад

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit4 ч. назад

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit4 ч. назад

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit4 ч. назад

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit4 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

2025 год — год институциональных инвесторов, в будущем он будет доминировать в приложениях реального времени.

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.12.16Обновлено 2025.12.16

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на AI (AI) представлены ниже.

活动图片