SEC opens proceedings on proposal to list options for Grayscale Crypto ETF

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-04-09Обновлено 2026-04-09

Введение

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has initiated formal proceedings to review a proposal to list and trade options on the Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC). This does not constitute a decision but represents the next phase in the evaluation process. The proposal, submitted by NYSE American, aims to introduce physically settled options on the ETF, which tracks a basket of cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Solana, and Cardano. The SEC is seeking public comments and further analysis to assess whether the proposal meets regulatory standards, particularly concerning fraud prevention and investor protection. The move highlights the growing sophistication of crypto-linked derivatives while underscoring the SEC's continued caution regarding market manipulation risks in the digital asset space. A final decision will follow the review period, with no specified timeline provided.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has opened formal proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove a proposal to list and trade options on the Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF, signaling continued caution toward crypto-linked derivatives.

The move does not represent a decision on the proposal. Instead, it marks the next stage of the review process, in which the regulator seeks additional analysis and public comment before reaching a final outcome.

Proposal targets multi-asset crypto ETF options

The application, filed by NYSE American, seeks approval to list options on the Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF [GDLC], a fund designed to track a basket of major digital assets.

According to the filing, the ETF is primarily weighted toward Bitcoin and Ethereum, alongside smaller allocations to XRP, Solana, and Cardano.

The proposed options would be physically settled and traded under existing exchange rules, with standard surveillance and reporting mechanisms applied.

SEC signals need for further scrutiny

In its order, the SEC said it is instituting proceedings to evaluate whether the proposal meets the requirements under the Securities Exchange Act, particularly with respect to preventing fraud and protecting investors.

The regulator is specifically seeking comments on whether the exchange has provided sufficient analysis to demonstrate that the product would not be susceptible to manipulation and that existing safeguards are adequate.

Importantly, the SEC noted that opening proceedings does not indicate any conclusion on the proposal, but reflects the need for further consideration of the legal and policy issues involved.

Derivatives expansion meets regulatory caution

The proposal highlights the continued evolution of the U.S. crypto market structure, where products are gradually moving beyond spot ETFs into more complex derivatives.

Options on a multi-asset crypto ETF would represent another layer of market sophistication. It allows traders to hedge or speculate on broader digital asset exposure through traditional financial instruments.

However, the SEC’s cautious approach underscores ongoing concerns about market integrity and the potential for manipulation in crypto-linked products.

Next steps

The Commission has invited public comments on the proposal, including whether it aligns with investor protection standards.

A final decision will be made following the review period. However, no timeline has been specified beyond the procedural deadlines for submissions.

For now, the filing reflects a familiar pattern in U.S. crypto regulation: incremental progress, paired with continued scrutiny.

Final Summary

  • The SEC has opened proceedings on a proposal to list options for a multi-asset crypto ETF, signaling further expansion of crypto derivatives.
  • The move reflects ongoing regulatory caution, with concerns around market manipulation and investor protection still central to decision-making.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the SEC's current stance on the proposal to list options for the Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF?

AThe SEC has opened formal proceedings to review the proposal, signaling continued caution and the need for further scrutiny, but it has not yet made a final decision.

QWhich cryptocurrency ETF is the subject of the options listing proposal filed by NYSE American?

AThe proposal seeks to list options on the Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC).

QWhat are the main cryptocurrencies that the underlying Grayscale ETF is weighted towards?

AThe ETF is primarily weighted towards Bitcoin and Ethereum, with smaller allocations to XRP, Solana, and Cardano.

QWhat specific concerns is the SEC evaluating regarding this proposal?

AThe SEC is evaluating whether the proposal meets the requirements to prevent fraud and protect investors, specifically if the product is susceptible to manipulation and if existing safeguards are adequate.

QWhat does the SEC's action represent in the broader context of U.S. crypto regulation?

AIt reflects a familiar pattern of incremental progress in expanding crypto products, paired with continued regulatory scrutiny and caution over market integrity and investor protection.

Похожее

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist8 мин. назад

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist8 мин. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1 ч. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1 ч. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow