Over 100 Illegal Mining Farms Found in the North Caucasus Since the Beginning of the Year

RBK-cryptoОпубликовано 2025-12-11Обновлено 2025-12-11

Введение

Since the beginning of 2025, over 100 illegal cryptocurrency mining farms have been discovered in Russia's North Caucasus Federal District, according to "Rosseti Severny Kavkaz." The total financial damage from their operations is estimated at over 656 million rubles. Although cryptocurrency mining is officially banned in the region until Spring 2031, many illegal miners continue to operate by stealing electricity, either bypassing meters or connecting directly to the grid without contracts. The breakdown of discovered farms by region is as follows: 79 in Dagestan (causing 89.5 million rubles in damage), 14 in Ingushetia (455.5 million rubles), 5 in Karachay-Cherkessia (104.1 million rubles), 2 in Stavropol Krai (1 million rubles), 2 in North Ossetia (390,000 rubles), and 1 in Kabardino-Balkaria (5.8 million rubles). Dagestan leads in the number of cases, which the energy company attributes to individuals attempting to generate profit without using their own funds for electricity. In response to the widespread issue, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak announced on December 8th that the government plans to establish both administrative and criminal liability for violations related to cryptocurrency mining.

More than 100 illegal mining farms have been identified since the beginning of 2025 in the North Caucasus Federal District, according to the company "Rosseti Severny Kavkaz" (Russian Grids of the North Caucasus) as cited by TASS. The total amount of damage exceeded 656 million rubles.

Cryptocurrency mining is prohibited in the republics of the North Caucasus until the spring of 2031. However, many illegal miners remain in the regions, stealing electricity by bypassing meters or connecting to the grid directly without contracts.

5 underground farms were discovered in Karachay-Cherkessia (damage of 104.1 million rubles), two in the Stavropol Territory (1 million rubles) and North Ossetia (390 thousand rubles), and one more in Kabardino-Balkaria (5.8 million rubles).

The most significant damage to energy companies was caused by 14 farms in Ingushetia — 455.5 million rubles. The largest number of illegal miners was identified in Dagestan. There, 79 farms were found, which caused damage amounting to 89.5 million rubles.

"Dagestan still leads in the number of illegal mining cases. This is related to attempts by certain citizens to profit without using their own funds," the energy company reported.

On December 8, at a meeting of the Council for Strategic Development and National Projects, Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak stated that the government plans to establish both administrative and criminal liability for violations related to cryptocurrency mining. Lawyers told "RBC-Crypto" where the line between administrative and criminal offenses in the field of mining might be drawn.

In Belarus, reasons for blocking crypto exchange websites have been named. What is known.

Bitcoin mining difficulty has fallen for the third time in a row. What this indicates.

The Central Bank has proposed limiting ordinary Russians' right to purchase cryptocurrency.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QHow many illegal mining farms were discovered in the North Caucasus since the beginning of 2025?

AMore than 100 illegal mining farms were discovered.

QWhat is the total amount of financial damage caused by these illegal mining operations?

AThe total financial damage amounted to more than 656 million rubles.

QUntil when is cryptocurrency mining banned in the republics of the North Caucasus?

ACryptocurrency mining is banned until the spring of 2031.

QWhich Russian region suffered the most financial damage from these illegal mining farms?

AIngushetia suffered the most financial damage, with 14 farms causing 455.5 million rubles in damage.

QWhat did the Russian government plan to establish regarding cryptocurrency mining violations, as stated by Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak?

AThe government plans to establish both administrative and criminal liability for violations related to cryptocurrency mining.

Похожее

AI "Transfer Station" Earning Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage

The article "AI 'Transfer Station' Earns Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage" explores the emerging business of API token transfer stations, which profit from global AI service price disparities and access barriers. These intermediaries purchase low-cost tokens from overseas AI providers (e.g., OpenAI, Claude) through grey-market methods—such as exploiting enterprise credits, bulk accounts, or subscription benefits—and resell them to Chinese users at a markup. Key drivers include the high cost of using top AI models (e.g., Claude Code costs ~$5 per million tokens), the performance gap between domestic and foreign models, and mismatches between subscription and API pricing. However, the practice carries significant risks: upstream token sources may be unstable or illegal; user data passing through intermediaries can be harvested or injected with hidden prompts; and models might be downgraded without disclosure. The market is evolving, with some operators now exporting cheaper Chinese models (e.g., Qwen3.5 at ~$0.11 per million tokens) to overseas users, leveraging price gaps. Yet, sustainability is low due to compliance crackdowns, instability, and reputational risks. Users are advised to employ detection methods (e.g., prompt adherence tests) and avoid sensitive data usage. The authors caution that while transfer stations offer short-term arbitrage, they lack long-term reliability and security compared to official APIs.

marsbit1 мин. назад

AI "Transfer Station" Earning Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage

marsbit1 мин. назад

The Cost of an 11.5% Annualized Return: Will MicroStrategy's STRC Face a Moment of Reckoning?

This article analyzes the potential risks associated with MicroStrategy's (MSTR) use of structured financial products like STRC to leverage its BTC exposure. While these tools have enabled impressive returns (e.g., 11.5% annualized) and fueled significant capital inflows ($13.5B outstanding), they also create substantial annual dividend obligations (~$400M). The author argues that this structure, while effective in a bull market, could become a liability if BTC price stagnates or declines. The core risk is a potential negative feedback loop: the growing dividend burden from continued STRC issuance may eventually outweigh the benefits of increased BTC holdings. To meet these obligations, MicroStrategy might need to use new issuance proceeds for dividends instead of buying more BTC, which could disappoint equity investors. If the market capitalization (mNAV) falls below the value of its BTC holdings, the company could be forced to sell BTC instead of issuing new shares, potentially triggering a panic. The author estimates a potential inflection point in 6 months, where annual dividend costs reach $3-4B. At that stage, CEO Michael Saylor might face a difficult choice: sell BTC to meet obligations or sacrifice the credibility of the preferred shares by halting dividends. The article concludes that this financial engineering, while powerful, could ultimately "backfire" on MicroStrategy if market conditions turn.

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Cost of an 11.5% Annualized Return: Will MicroStrategy's STRC Face a Moment of Reckoning?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片