OP Token Crashes to Record Low as Price Moves Below $0.13

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-20Обновлено 2026-02-20

Введение

OP Token (OP) has crashed to a record low, falling over 9% in 24 hours to trade near $0.13 and hitting an all-time low of $0.1271. This represents a decline of over 97% from its all-time high of $4.85. Traders faced $2.23 million in liquidations, predominantly from long positions. Despite the price drop, open interest surged 25.34%, indicating high market activity. The decline is partly attributed to Base, a Layer 2 chain, moving away from the OP Stack, which weakens Optimism's Superchain vision. Technical analysis shows OP is deeply oversold with an RSI between 21-29, suggesting potential for a short-term bounce, but the MACD remains bearish. Key support is at $0.125, with resistance at $0.14.

Optimism Token (OP) has fallen more than 9% in the last 24 hours, now trading at nearly $0.13. With that, on February 20, it even hit an all-time low of $0.1271. This is a huge fall from its all-time high of $4.85 in March 2024, which is over 97% down.

According to the Coinglass derivatives data, Optimism traders faced $2.23 million in liquidation, with most of that coming from long positions, means who had bet the price would go up around $1.98 million in the last 24 hours. While the open interest data varies, which shows how many active trades are open, went up 25.34% in one day, showing the market is still very active.

With that, on February 18, Layer 2 chain, Base introduced a single unified stack called for accelerating upgrades and additional security, and it was planned to make public and open for contribution, as it is moving away from the OP Stack, but it assures that it would remain compatible with OP Stack standards.

As this shift from Base, which indicates a fundamental weakening of the Optimism’s Superchain vision, which is a grand idea to unite multiple Layer-2 chains under shared governance, shared security, unified governnace and revenue-sharing agreements.

OP Price Analysis

Optimism Token (OP) continues to trade near $0.13, after previously reaching around $1.40. The 24-hour trading volume has risen by approximately 7.79%, standing at $224.19 million, showing continued market activity despite the token’s decline.

With that, the immediate support for OP token lies at $0.125; if it breaks below, the OP token could fall deeper toward $0.110 – $0.100. On the reversal, the immediate resistance is seen at $0. 14, when the token breaks above this, the token could touch $0.16.

Analyzing through technical indicators, RSI is standing around the 21-29 range, which is a deeply oversold condition, which shows a chance for a short-term bounce, but if a token shows strong downtrends, it could stay below for longer periods, too. Also, the OP’s Moving Average Convergence and Divergence line is below zero, which indicates a clear bearish signal.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Bloomberg Intelligence Analyst Mike McGlone Has Revised BTC Price Prediction, but a Broader Concern Remains

TagsOPOptimism

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the current trading price of Optimism Token (OP) and how much has it fallen in the last 24 hours?

AThe Optimism Token (OP) is currently trading at nearly $0.13, having fallen more than 9% in the last 24 hours.

QWhat was the all-time low price for OP and when was it hit?

AOP hit an all-time low of $0.1271 on February 20.

QHow much did Optimism traders face in liquidations, and what type of positions made up the majority of these losses?

AOptimism traders faced $2.23 million in liquidations, with the majority (around $1.98 million) coming from long positions.

QWhat technical indicator suggests OP is in a deeply oversold condition, and what does this indicate?

AThe RSI (Relative Strength Index) is standing around the 21-29 range, which indicates a deeply oversold condition and suggests a chance for a short-term bounce.

QWhat recent development from Base indicates a potential weakening of Optimism's Superchain vision?

ABase introduced a new unified stack, moving away from the OP Stack, which indicates a fundamental weakening of Optimism’s Superchain vision of uniting multiple Layer-2 chains.

Похожее

Who Will Take Over After SpaceX's IPO?

SpaceX is set to go public on June 12 with a $1.8 trillion valuation, but only about 5.56 billion shares (4.2% of the total) will be initially available for trading. Buy-side pressure is expected in three distinct waves. First, the IPO subscription at a fixed $135 per share, which is oversubscribed by nearly 4 times. Second, immediate secondary market trading post-listing. Third, and most significant, the forced buying by passive index funds. The Nasdaq 100 index has modified its rules to include SpaceX just 15 trading days after its IPO, despite its small float, which will compel hundreds of tracking funds to buy large quantities of stock. However, this initial supply shortage will not last. A staged lock-up release is designed for the approximately 54% of shares held by VCs, early employees, and other insiders (excluding Elon Musk's 42%, which is locked for 366 days). Releases begin after the Q2 earnings report, with subsequent unlocks at multiple intervals up to 180 days post-IPO. This means selling pressure from insiders will gradually increase throughout the latter half of the year. A key counterbalance is scheduled for mid-December during the Nasdaq 100's annual rebalancing. By then, the public float will have expanded significantly, forcing index funds to buy more shares, potentially providing institutional support after months of insider selling.

marsbit28 мин. назад

Who Will Take Over After SpaceX's IPO?

marsbit28 мин. назад

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbit47 мин. назад

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbit47 мин. назад

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbit1 ч. назад

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbit1 ч. назад

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Bitcoin 400-Day Cycle: Historical Performance Shows How Low The Bottom Goes

A crypto analyst forecasts a continued Bitcoin bear market, predicting a potential price bottom around October 2026 based on a historical 400-day cycle pattern. The analysis suggests Bitcoin is currently 252 days into a bear phase that typically lasts 364-400 days, indicating another 112-148 days of downward pressure. The projected cycle low could be around $30,000, representing a more than 75% decline from recent all-time highs near $126,000. The analyst dismisses arguments that current market factors like ETFs make this cycle different, noting the pattern has held for over a decade. Another expert aligns, forecasting a bottom between $30,000-$40,000 by late Q3 or early Q4 2026 and rejecting the possibility of Bitcoin reaching $100,000 this year.

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

The Bitcoin 400-Day Cycle: Historical Performance Shows How Low The Bottom Goes

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow