Nasdaq and CME Rebrand Joint Crypto Index to Expand Exposure

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-10Обновлено 2026-01-10

Введение

Nasdaq and CME Group have rebranded their joint crypto index to the Nasdaq-CME Crypto Index, deepening their long-standing collaboration. The updated index serves as a benchmark for investors seeking diversified exposure beyond single-asset crypto strategies, reflecting growing regulatory clarity and institutional participation. It tracks multiple cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, Ether, XRP, Solana, Chainlink, Cardano, and Avalanche, representing a broader market view rather than a Bitcoin-centric approach. The index emphasizes governance, transparency, and institutional risk compliance, with eligibility rules, liquidity thresholds, and quarterly rebalancing. This initiative builds on the decades-long partnership between Nasdaq and CME, which began with Nasdaq-100 futures in the 1990s.

Nasdaq and CME Group have collaborated on their crypto indexing efforts under the same roof, renewing the Nasdaq Crypto Index as the Nasdaq-CME Crypto Index. The step has helped in deepening the collaboration between the two market infrastructure providers that dates back around three decades, as per Nasdaq.

The revised index is made to act as the base benchmark for investors looking for exposure beyond single-asset crypto strategies, as regulatory clarity and institutional participation continuously expand.

The executive director of equity and alternative products at CME Group, Giovanni, revealed that this is not only a name change. He further explained that the index is an amalgamation of two established market standards targeting the delivery of governance and diversification as compared to the traditional asset classes.

The Further Update

The Nasdaq-CME Crypto Index keeps track of the majority of virtual assets, adding BTC, Ether, XRP, Solana, Chainlink, Cardano and Avalanche. Nasdaq further revealed that the index is made to show the wider crypto market instead of concentrating completely on Bitcoin, a shift that shows how investors approach equities and other asset classes.

The head of index product management at Nasdaq, Sean Wasserman, revealed investors are growing towards index-based exposure as the crypto market seems more complex. He also said that we witness the index-based approach as the direction investors are moving, beyond only BTC.

Governance and transparency are at the core of the index’s structure. The benchmark is an estimation of CF Benchmarks and overlooked by a joint governance committee, having eligibility rules, liquidity thresholds, and quarterly rebalancing highlighted in a published methodology.

The officials stated this substructure is made to line up with institutional risk and compliance anticipations. The rollout also builds on Nasdaq and CME Group’s long history of partnership, which started with Nasdaq-100 futures in the 1990s and later widened into one of the world’s most liquid equity index derivatives ecosystems.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

NFT Sales Jump 27% Despite Sharp Drop in Market Activity

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the new name of the rebranded crypto index from Nasdaq and CME?

AThe new name is the Nasdaq-CME Crypto Index.

QAccording to the article, what is the main purpose of the revised index?

AThe revised index is designed to act as the base benchmark for investors seeking exposure beyond single-asset crypto strategies.

QWhich major cryptocurrencies are tracked by the new Nasdaq-CME Crypto Index?

AThe index tracks BTC, Ether, XRP, Solana, Chainlink, Cardano, and Avalanche.

QWhat two core principles are at the heart of the index's structure, as stated in the article?

AGovernance and transparency are at the core of the index's structure.

QHow does the head of index product management at Nasdaq describe the direction investors are moving in?

ASean Wasserman stated that investors are moving towards an index-based approach, looking beyond only BTC.

Похожее

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

When launching a crypto payment business, obtaining the necessary licenses is the crucial first step. However, the second, and arguably more critical, step is designing a comprehensive operational framework that forms a coherent business loop. This loop must be clearly understood and executable by all stakeholders: banks, payment partners, exchanges, on-chain analytics providers, regulators, and your internal team. Many projects mistakenly believe a single license permits all operations. Licenses merely grant entry; they don't define how the specific business functions. The real challenge lies in detailing every aspect of the workflow. This involves clarifying the customer base, the flow of fiat and crypto assets, the settlement process, and establishing clear lines of responsibility for risks like AML compliance, sanctions screening, chargebacks, and regulatory inquiries. A robust framework must answer seven core questions: Who are the clients and merchants? Who collects fiat and crypto? Who handles conversion and custody? And who is ultimately accountable for compliance and risk management? Projects often fail not from a lack of licensing, but during due diligence when they cannot convincingly explain these operational details. Therefore, beyond securing licenses, the priority must be constructing a closed-loop system. This system ensures the business model is transparent, risks are managed, responsibilities are delineated, contracts are aligned, and the entire process is comprehensible to partners and regulators. The true competitive edge in crypto payments lies not in acquiring a license quickly, but in integrating licensing, banking, compliance, and operations into a sustainable and executable whole.

marsbit21 мин. назад

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

marsbit21 мин. назад

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Arthur Hayes argues that the current AI market is a bubble poised to burst, which will exert downward pressure on the crypto market in the near term. The core trigger is rising oil prices due to the US-Iran conflict and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Higher energy costs directly increase the operational expenses of AI data centers, squeezing profit margins for companies like Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Hayes predicts that persistent inflation from high oil prices will force Trump, in a bid to win the November election, to turn public sentiment against the AI industry. He may propose regulations and taxes on data centers and AI companies to appeal to voters concerned about costs and job displacement. Such political rhetoric could shatter market confidence. Furthermore, the market is unlikely to healthily absorb the massive concurrent IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, which together seek valuations in the trillions. The combination of soaring energy costs, overwhelming equity supply, and negative political pressure will puncture the AI bubble. Hayes notes that nearly all new USD liquidity since 2022 has flowed into AI, leaving crypto like Bitcoin behind. When the AI bubble bursts, liquidity will contract sharply, pulling down all risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. In response, Hayes's fund, Maelstrom, has sold all AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. It maintains core positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum while increasing exposure to energy sector equities, betting on rising oil and gas prices. He expects Bitcoin to bottom after the AI-led market decline, before rallying again with future monetary easing.

Foresight News35 мин. назад

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Foresight News35 мин. назад

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

After To C and To B, the Next Wave is To A: Serving AI Agents In a recent quarterly earnings call, Meituan's Wang Xing introduced a new concept: To A (To Agent), signifying that future business services will increasingly target AI Agents as primary clients, not just consumers or merchants. This shift implies that internet giants must now consider how to make their services more appealing for AI Agents to recommend, fundamentally altering traditional distribution logic. This "To A era" is prompting an unusual trend of alliances among major tech companies. Unlike previous competitive battles, firms like Meituan, Tencent, JD.com, Huawei, OPPO, and OpenAI are rapidly forming partnerships. The reason is strategic: as AI Agents become the primary user interface, handling tasks from a single command (e.g., "Book a Japanese restaurant for tomorrow"), the risk for platforms is being bypassed entirely. Companies are positioning themselves within this new value chain. Three primary strategies are emerging: 1. **Super-Entry Points + Service Providers:** Platforms like Tencent's Yuanbao, WeChat, and ChatGPT aim to be the first-stop Agent, integrating various services (food delivery, shopping, travel) from partners like Meituan and JD.com. 2. **Apps as Callable Services:** Companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Uber are ensuring their core services remain accessible and callable by external Agents, shifting from front-end apps to back-end capabilities. 3. **System-Level Agent Entry Points:** Smartphone makers (Huawei, Honor, OPPO) are leveraging their OS-level AI assistants to control the initial user command, redistributing it to relevant service apps. While alliances offer mutual benefit—entry points gain service capabilities, and service providers gain traffic—inherent conflicts of interest exist. A dominant Agent platform could eventually attempt to connect directly with suppliers (restaurants, hotels), bypassing current aggregators like Meituan or Ctrip. Other unresolved challenges include the potential for Agent recommendations to become a new form of paid ranking and unclear accountability for faulty recommendations. The current rush to form alliances is a defensive move by service providers to secure their position before the landscape solidifies. In this To A-driven restructuring, the greatest risk is not losing the race but failing to hear the starting gun.

marsbit43 мин. назад

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

marsbit43 мин. назад

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

As humanoid robots become increasingly lifelike, they confront a significant psychological barrier known as the "Uncanny Valley Effect," a concept proposed by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. This phenomenon describes a dip in human comfort and acceptance when robots appear almost, but not perfectly, human. Minor imperfections in facial expressions, eye movements, or skin texture trigger a subconscious sense of unease, as the brain detects something trying, yet failing, to mimic a person. Examples range from the controversial human-like robot Sophia to animated characters in films like *The Polar Express*. The effect poses a key design challenge for robotics companies. Some, like Boston Dynamics, avoid it entirely by creating highly capable but visibly mechanical robots. Others, like Hanson Robotics, push for greater human likeness despite the risk. For consumer robots, especially in homes, most manufacturers opt for stylized or clearly mechanical designs to ensure broader acceptance. While the Uncanny Valley remains a powerful force, its impact may diminish over time through technological advancements that achieve near-perfect realism or through generational familiarity as people grow accustomed to interacting with humanoid machines. Ultimately, navigating this psychological frontier requires as much understanding of human perception as of robotics technology itself.

marsbit44 мин. назад

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

marsbit44 мин. назад

Over $31 Million Stolen from Humanity, Is the Team Behind It Paving the Way for a New Project?

The article reports a major security incident involving Humanity Protocol (H), resulting in over $31 million stolen. The team attributes the hack to a private key leak from a Humanity Foundation member, leading to a rapid sale of H tokens and a 90% price drop. However, prominent on-chain investigator ZachXBT suggests the event might be an "exit scam" orchestrated by the team, rather than an external hack. This suspicion is fueled by the team's controversial history, including past management failures, legal issues, and previous scandals like outsourced technology and problematic airdrops. Further investigation reveals that the core team behind Humanity is already involved with a new project called "Everything," which recently secured funding. This has led to community speculation that the alleged hack is a deliberate scheme to abandon the H project while shifting focus and resources to their new venture, leaving investors to bear the losses. The article questions whether this is a genuine security failure or a premeditated "rug pull" strategy.

Odaily星球日报1 ч. назад

Over $31 Million Stolen from Humanity, Is the Team Behind It Paving the Way for a New Project?