Narrative Collapse, Trust Reset to Zero: Trove Kicks Off This Year's Crypto Rights Protection Campaign

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-19Обновлено 2026-01-19

Введение

Trove, a Perp DEX platform that claimed to tokenize and trade illiquid collectibles like trading cards and luxury watches, has collapsed amid allegations of fraud and insider manipulation. The project initially built momentum with high-profile partnerships and a $20M+ HYPE token acquisition, leading to a successful $11.5M ICO. However, the team abruptly extended then reversed the ICO timeline, enabling insider betting on prediction markets like Polymarket. Soon after, Trove abandoned its original blockchain, Hyperliquid, and attempted to dump millions in HYPE tokens. Investigations revealed undisclosed payments to influencers, preferential investment terms for insiders, and false public statements. With trust shattered and legal risks under MiCA regulations mounting, Trove’s token is expected to crash at launch, marking a severe breach of trust in the crypto community.

Trove once had a perfect narrative.

As a Perp DEX targeting collectibles and RWA, Trove claimed to be able to transform illiquid "cultural assets," such as Pokémon cards, CSGO skins, and luxury items like high-end watches, into tradable financial assets, providing a hedging venue for collectors.

However, within just ten days, the Trove team staged a farce through a series of astonishing operations. In the process, they emptied the pockets of onlookers.

Bait

At the end of October last year, Trove founder @unwisecap discussed the concept of "Everything Can Be Perped" in several articles and announced that Trove would be built based on HIP-3, building up the community's anticipation.

Over the following month, Trove successively announced collaborations with Kalshi and CARDS (Collector_Crypt), receiving official Twitter replies as "endorsements" from these well-known project teams (P.S. As of the time of writing, Kalshi had already completed the "cutting off," deleting their reply under Trove's official tweet).

In mid-December, Trove announced that it had spent over $20 million to acquire 500,000 HYPE tokens to meet the integration requirements of HIP-3. Shortly after, the testnet points program was launched, and the trading volume on the platform exceeded $1 million within two weeks. Everything seemed to be progressing as expected. Until...

A Textbook Case of Insider Trading

On January 6th, Trove suddenly announced an ICO with a $20 million FDV. The public sale adopted an "oversubscription" model, offering priority allocation rights to points holders. Accompanied by concentrated promotions from a group of KOLs sporting Trove badges, Trove successfully raised $11.5 million, oversubscribed by 4.6 times.

At this point, with less than two hours left until the ICO deadline, the probability of the "Trove ICO total fundraising amount greater than $20 million" prediction market on Polymarket had approached zero.

The real show began shortly after. The team suddenly broke the rules, announcing an extension of the ICO by five days to ensure fair allocation. The "YES" option on Polymarket instantly skyrocketed from the bottom to nearly 60%. Insider funds were clearly a step ahead; on-chain data showed that specific wallets placed precise bets before the announcement was made and quickly exited after the price surge.

Perhaps deeming the liquidity of the prediction market insufficient to satisfy their appetite, and amidst a wave of community skepticism, the Trove team seized the opportunity to stage a dramatic "crying wolf" scenario: they announced the withdrawal of the extension decision, ending the ICO as originally planned.

Following this announcement, the corresponding market directly zeroed out and settled. Polymarket data indicated that related wallets had placed precise bets before the news was released and continued to profit from the subsequent reversal.

The Great Retreat

On January 17th, Trove suddenly announced it was abandoning Hyperliquid and would instead issue its token on Solana. For a project that had been fundraising under the banner of the Hyperliquid ecosystem, this was nothing short of pulling the rug out from under everyone.

Simultaneously, on-chain detective MLM caught the Trove team using a timed sell function, attempting to sell half of their HYPE tokens within 40 minutes.

Choosing to sell tens of millions worth of tokens in 40 minutes on a weekend, during the lowest trading volume, showed the Trove team was truly desperate.

Faced with质疑 (queries/doubt), the explanation provided by the Trove team seemed feeble: "The backers got nervous and decided to exit." However, on-chain transaction records showed these sell-offs were conducted simultaneously while the team was publicly denying "we are selling tokens."

This inconsistency between words and actions彻底击穿了 (completely shattered) the community's trust底线 (bottom line). As trust collapsed, more shady details were uncovered.

Renowned on-chain detective ZachXBT disclosed that the Trove team paid @TJRTrades a hefty marketing fee of $45,000, directly depositing it into the KOL's online gambling site top-up address.

KOL @hrithikk stated that the Trove team not only provided KOLs with substantial marketing fees but also privately offered ICO allocations at valuations as low as $8.5 million, a discount of up to 60%, accompanied by huge airdrop rewards. Trove is still selling shares at low prices and has contacted him over 5 times asking if he would invest in Trove.

Trove's TGE is scheduled for January 20th at 1:00 AM Beijing Time. The prediction market on Polymarket shows, based on the pre-sale valuation, a 90% probability that the TROVE token will fall below its issuance price.

The good news is that this farce might not end with a simple "Soft Rug." Trove had previously claimed on its official website to comply with EU MiCA regulations. Now, facing accusations of false advertising and potential fraud, angry investors have every reason to initiate civil lawsuits based on MiCA provisions.

The bad news is, as revealed in chat screenshots by a KOL, team members appear to be from Iran.

The Hyperliquid ecosystem is known for its strong community cohesion, but this atmosphere of abundant trust also provides fertile ground for scammers to thrive.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was Trove's original value proposition and narrative before its controversial actions?

ATrove was a Perp DEX for collectibles and RWA that claimed to convert illiquid 'cultural assets' like Pokémon cards, CSGO skins, and luxury watches into tradable financial assets, providing a hedging venue for collectors.

QWhat key event on January 6th marked the beginning of Trove's 'insider trading textbook' scandal?

AOn January 6th, Trove announced an ICO with a $20 million FDV using an 'oversubscription' model, but then suddenly extended the ICO by 5 days after it was nearly complete, allowing insiders to profit on prediction markets like Polymarket with prior knowledge.

QWhat action did Trove take on January 17th that completely shattered community trust and was described as 'pulling the rug from the cauldron'?

AOn January 17th, Trove abruptly announced it was abandoning the Hyperliquid blockchain to issue its token on Solana instead, despite having fundraised under the Hyperliquid ecosystem, and was caught attempting to dump its HYPE tokens in a short time frame.

QAccording to on-chain detectives, what evidence exposed Trove's unethical practices regarding influencer marketing and private allocations?

AZachXBT revealed Trove paid a KOL $45,000 for marketing to a gambling site deposit address, and KOL @hrithikk disclosed that the team offered private ICO allocations at a 60% discount ($8.5M valuation vs. public $20M) with massive airdrop bonuses.

QWhat potential legal repercussions does Trove face according to the article, and what complicating factor was mentioned?

AInvestors could file civil lawsuits under EU's MiCA regulations for false advertising and potential fraud, but a complicating factor is that team members are allegedly from Iran, which may hinder legal action.

Похожее

From 'Old Dogs' to 'New Darlings': How AI is Revaluing Old Infrastructure, from Dell to Nokia

"Old Dogs" Become AI's New Darlings: Revaluing Legacy Infrastructure The AI investment narrative is shifting. Beyond the spotlight on core chipmakers like Nvidia, a new wave of interest is rising for legacy tech companies—Dell, HPE, Nokia, Cisco, Corning, Western Digital—once labeled as slow-growth, outdated stories. This resurgence stems from AI's evolution from model development to real-world deployment, creating massive demand for physical infrastructure. As AI moves into data center construction and enterprise adoption, the focus turns to who can actually build and deliver complex systems. These established players hold decades of experience in supply chains, integration, networking, and enterprise delivery—assets now critical for scaling AI. The revaluation can be grouped into three key infrastructure areas: 1. **Servers & Integration (e.g., Dell, HPE):** They are becoming essential system integrators, transforming GPUs into full-scale AI servers with networking, power, and cooling, then delivering them to clients. Strong recent earnings and AI-specific revenue/order growth for Dell and HPE underscore this shift. 2. **Networking & Connectivity (e.g., Corning, Nokia, Cisco):** As AI clusters grow, high-speed data transfer becomes paramount. Corning benefits from fiber demand for data center links, Nokia is exploring AI-integrated wireless networks (AI-RAN), and Cisco sees surging orders for data center switches—all critical for efficient AI operations. 3. **Storage (e.g., Western Digital, Seagate):** The AI data explosion requires vast capacity. Beyond high-speed memory (HBM), there's growing need for high-capacity HDDs to store training data, logs, video, and cold/archival data cost-effectively. This revaluation, however, is not a blanket endorsement. True reassessment requires concrete proof: AI-driven orders and revenue growth, upward revisions to company guidance, and sustainable improvements in profit quality, not just top-line sales. In essence, AI is not turning all old tech firms into high-growth stocks; it is selectively re-pricing the "old assets" of companies that are mission-critical for building the new AI infrastructure, transforming their legacy capabilities into renewed growth engines.

marsbit4 мин. назад

From 'Old Dogs' to 'New Darlings': How AI is Revaluing Old Infrastructure, from Dell to Nokia

marsbit4 мин. назад

Probability in the Price: How World Cup Odds Are Calculated

**The Probability in the Price: How World Cup Odds Are Calculated** Two major systems released their "championship probabilities" before the 2026 World Cup, and they disagreed on the favorite. Prediction market aggregators listed France at around **17%**, while the Opta supercomputer gave European champion Spain **16.1%**. These numbers look similar, but their production methods are fundamentally different. The market's **17%** is the **price** that clears after hundreds of millions of dollars in trading across platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, where contracts trade between 0 and 100 cents, directly representing implied probability. This liquidity is provided by crypto-native market makers like Wintermute, though the market still has "the liquidity profile of an early-stage" asset class. In contrast, Opta's **16.1%** is a **simulated frequency**. Its model uses team data (including betting market odds as an input) to estimate match probabilities, then runs **10,000 full tournament simulations**, counting how often each team wins. Which is more accurate? There is **no rigorous, cross-tournament academic study** directly comparing their track records. However, a persistent **longshot bias**—where low-probability outcomes are systematically overvalued—observed in traditional betting for nearly a century, has also been found in modern crypto prediction markets. Research shows low-price contracts on Kalshi/Polymer less likely to pay out than their implied odds suggest. Unlike traditional bookmakers, prediction markets operate on **public blockchain ledgers**, making every transaction auditable and enabling such research. However, price formation is also influenced by **regulatory uncertainty**, as seen in recent US state-level bans and legal battles over jurisdiction. In summary, the "probability" you see is either a **market-clearing price** subject to behavioral biases and liquidity constraints, or a **model-simulated frequency** that partially incorporates market data. The question of which method is more reliable remains open, highlighting the importance of asking: **How was this number produced?**

marsbit33 мин. назад

Probability in the Price: How World Cup Odds Are Calculated

marsbit33 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片