Morgan Stanley Taps Amy Oldenburg to Coordinate Firmwide Crypto Strategy

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-28Обновлено 2026-01-28

Введение

Morgan Stanley has appointed Amy Oldenburg to a newly created role to coordinate the firm's digital asset strategy, as the bank intensifies its push into crypto. An internal memo from co-presidents Andy Saperstein and Dan Simkowitz confirmed her position within a firm-wide strategy and execution effort. This move aligns with the bank's shift from offering crypto access to building a more robust product toolkit. Recently, Morgan Stanley filed for Bitcoin and Solana-related exchange-traded products, signaling a deeper commitment to regulated crypto exposure. The bank also plans to enable cryptocurrency trading on its E-Trade platform by mid-2026, starting with BTC, ETH, and SOL. In wealth management, it advises a cautious 2-4% crypto allocation based on risk appetite, referring to Bitcoin as "digital gold." Oldenburg's role will unify product development, partnerships, and execution as crypto gains mainstream traction.

Morgan Stanley has made a new role for better coordination of its digital-asset strategy, knocking out prolonged official Amy Oldenburg as the bank intensifies its push into crypto.

Bloomberg also reported that an internal memo was sent on January 26 by co-presidents Andy Saperstein and Dan Simkowitz mentioning that Oldenburg will sit within a firm-wide strategy and execution effort.

The appointment is made amid the shift of the bank from offering access to crypto products to making a more firm toolkit. At the beginning of this month, Morgan Stanley Investment Management filed preliminary registration statements for exchange-traded products associated with Bitcoin and Solana, a clear indication that it needs a bigger foothold in regulated crypto exposure.

The Further Plans To Widen

The filings have also come as US rules revolving around the crypto market continue to evolve and have somehow captivated more traditional finance companies into the sector. Reuters mentioned that the ETF push by Morgan Stanley is a part of a wider trend of banks inclining towards digital assets under President Donald Trump’s administration.

Talking about the brokerage side, Morgan Stanley has also said it has plans to provide cryptocurrency trading on its E-Trade platform in the first six months of 2026, leveraging Zerohash for digital-asset infrastructure, with BTC, ETH and SOL among the initial tokens.

Within the boundaries of wealth management, the bank has initiated putting guardrails around how clients approach the asset class. A Global Investment Committee report mentioned cryptocurrency as risky and advised an allotment of around 2% to 4%, relying on risk appetite, while comparing Bitcoin to “digital gold”.

The new remit of Oldenburg associates those strands together, providing Morgan Stanley a single senior point person to line up product development, collaborations and execution as crypto moves further into mainstream markets.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Japan Moves to Strengthen Stablecoin Oversight With New Reserve Asset Rules

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWho has Morgan Stanley appointed to coordinate its firmwide crypto strategy?

AAmy Oldenburg.

QWhat is one of the key initiatives Morgan Stanley is pursuing in the crypto space, as mentioned in the internal memo?

AMorgan Stanley is shifting from offering access to crypto products to creating a more firm toolkit, including filing for Bitcoin and Solana exchange-traded products.

QOn which platform does Morgan Stanley plan to offer cryptocurrency trading by 2026?

AOn its E-Trade platform.

QWhat percentage of a portfolio does Morgan Stanley's Global Investment Committee advise allocating to cryptocurrency?

AApproximately 2% to 4%, depending on risk appetite.

QWhich company is Morgan Stanley leveraging for digital-asset infrastructure on its E-Trade platform?

AZerohash.

Похожее

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbit2 мин. назад

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbit2 мин. назад

Trump Media’s Crypto Bet Implodes With Massive $406M Quarterly Loss

Trump Media & Technology Group, parent company of Truth Social, reported a massive $406 million net loss in Q1 2026, sharply up from $31.7 million a year earlier. The collapse was driven primarily by $370 million in unrealized losses from digital asset investments. These include a $61 million loss on 756 million Cronos tokens and a nearly $500 million gap on 9,542 Bitcoin purchased near the 2025 market peak, though Bitcoin's recent recovery has reduced that paper loss. Adding to turmoil, CEO Devin Nunes resigned in late April. Meanwhile, the company's core media revenue was only $871,200, a minimal increase. Despite the financial losses, the company generated $18 million in operating cash flow by selling options on its pledged Bitcoin holdings. Its stock, once valued at over $97, now trades around $9, reflecting a more than 90% decline from its 2022 peak.

bitcoinist8 мин. назад

Trump Media’s Crypto Bet Implodes With Massive $406M Quarterly Loss

bitcoinist8 мин. назад

Bitcoin Volatility Returns as Price Tests Critical Indicator Level

Bitcoin experienced significant volatility, briefly surpassing $82,000 before falling back to around $80,000. This triggered over $400 million in liquidations within 24 hours, though the price later recovered moderately above $81,000. The key focus is Bitcoin's approach to the critical 200-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), a major resistance level near $82,580 that has repeatedly capped price advances since November 2025. Analyst Brett suggests a sustained break above this level could signal the end of the bear market. However, failure to breach it has historically led to sharp declines, with an average drop of 30% from this rejection zone. If this pattern repeats, Bitcoin's price could potentially fall to around $56,600 from current levels. Despite the price pressure, cryptocurrency investment products saw a sixth consecutive week of inflows totaling $4.9 billion, supported by positive sentiment around US crypto legislation.

TheNewsCrypto34 мин. назад

Bitcoin Volatility Returns as Price Tests Critical Indicator Level

TheNewsCrypto34 мин. назад

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA and a first-generation immigrant, delivered the commencement address to Carnegie Mellon University's class of 2026. He shared his personal journey from a humble background to founding NVIDIA, emphasizing resilience, learning from failure, and the responsibility that comes with leadership. Huang framed the present moment as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift he believes is more profound than previous computing waves. He described AI as fundamentally resetting computing—moving from human-written software to machines that understand, reason, and use tools. This will create a new industry for generating intelligence and transform every sector. While acknowledging AI's potential to automate tasks and displace some jobs, Huang distinguished between the *tasks* of a job and its core *purpose*. He argued AI will augment human capability, not replace humans. The real risk, he stated, is not AI itself, but people being left behind by those who effectively use AI. He presented AI as a generational opportunity for massive infrastructure investment—in chip factories, data centers, energy grids, and advanced manufacturing—that could re-industrialize nations like the U.S. and bridge the digital divide by making computing and intelligent tools accessible to all. Huang called for a balanced approach: advancing AI safely and responsibly, establishing prudent policies, ensuring broad access, and encouraging universal participation. He urged the graduates not to fear the future but to engage with optimism and ambition, reminding them of CMU's motto, "My heart is in the work." His core message was clear: this is their moment to actively build and shape the AI-powered future, not merely observe it.

marsbit59 мин. назад

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

marsbit59 мин. назад

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

The article describes an era where AI-generated content is flooding the market, forcing human authors to prove they are not machines. It begins with the example of dozens of AI-written, error-ridden biographies of Henry Kissinger appearing on Amazon within hours of his death, a pattern repeated for other deceased celebrities and even living experts who find fraudulent books under their names. This spam content has exploded, with monthly new book releases on platforms like Amazon reaching 300,000 by late 2025. The issue spans genres, from suspiciously high proportions of AI-written teen romance and self-help books to dangerous, AI-generated foraging guides containing lethal advice. The platforms' automated review systems, designed to catch plagiarism and banned words, are ill-equipped to detect AI-generated text that avoids these pitfalls while being nonsensical or fraudulent. The problem has infiltrated traditional publishing. A major publisher, Hachette, had to recall a bestselling horror novel after AI detection tools suggested 78% of its content was machine-generated. An acclaimed European philosophy book was later revealed to be entirely written by AI under a fake author persona. In response, authors are fighting back. At the 2026 London Book Fair, 10,000 writers published a blank book titled "Don't Steal This Book" containing only their signatures—using emptiness as a protest weapon in an age of AI overproduction. Initiatives like the "Human Author Certification" program have emerged, ironically placing the burden on humans to prove their work is not machine-made. The article warns of a vicious cycle: AI-generated low-quality books pollute the data used to train future AI models, leading to "model collapse" and an ever-worsening flood of digital waste, eroding trust in publishing and devaluing human creativity.

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines