Hyperliquid (HYPE) Drops 25% in February, Key Support Tested

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-16Обновлено 2026-02-16

Введение

Hyperliquid (HYPE) has experienced a significant decline, dropping over 25% in February 2026. Currently trading at $29.77, it is down 5.51% in the past 24 hours. The token being 50.07% below its all-time high of $59.39 from September of the previous year. Its market capitalization stands at $7.76 billion. The token is testing a critical support level, and a further 10% decline is possible if bearish pressure continues. Technical indicators show key resistance levels at $34.21, $37.59, and $43.09, with support levels at $23.28, $19.92, and $14.44. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is neutral at 50.19. The current downturn is attributed to a lack of bullish participation rather than aggressive selling, suggesting a corrective move rather than a full trend reversal. A rebound is possible if the support holds and trading volume increases.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) has been captivating strong market attention for the past few days; however, the price action tells another story. Instead of increased interest, HYPE continuously trades on a negative side, slipping over 25% since the beginning of February 2026.

At the time of writing, the token is exchanging hands at $29.77, down by 5.51% in the past 24 hours. The seven-day move remained down by 5.92% and up around 17.97% in one month’s tenure. The token also showed an upward trajectory as compared to the last year and is up around 13.11%.

The 24-hour price performance shows a low of $29.59 and a high sitting at $31.64. The token remains 50.07% down from the all-time high of $59.39 hit in September last year and 826.7% up from the all-time low of $3.20 hit in November 2024. With this, the overall market capitalisation of the token stands at $7.76 billion.

The token seems prone to another 10% in the near future as it sits near a critical support zone. If sellers continue their control, the continuing downtrend may surge. Although, the bearish pressure could immediately fade if bulls come in with conviction.

The Technical Indicator

The technical indicator shows the first resistance at $34.21, followed by second and third resistances at $37.59 and $43.09, respectively. On the other hand, the first support level sits at $23.28, with second and third support levels at $19.92 and $14.44, respectively.

The relative strength index indicates a neutral level, being at the 50.19 mark. The 20-50-100 day exponential moving averages remain at 30.37, 29.24 and 30.71. It is noteworthy that the current fall is mostly influenced by waning bullish participation instead of aggressive selling. This also suggests that the recent move is corrective regardless of a full trend reversal.

If HYPE remains at the support zone and volume restores, a rebound is possible, possibly setting the stage for one more attempt for the resistance range.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Momentum Ignites: Can MUBARAK Extend Its 11% Breakout Into a Stronger Bullish Phase?

TagsHYPEHyperliquidHyperliquid (HYPE)

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the current price of Hyperliquid (HYPE) and how much has it fallen in February 2026?

AThe current price of Hyperliquid (HYPE) is $29.77, and it has fallen over 25% since the beginning of February 2026.

QWhat are the first resistance and first support levels for HYPE according to the technical indicators?

AThe first resistance level is at $34.21, and the first support level is at $23.28.

QHow does the current HYPE price compare to its all-time high and all-time low?

AThe current price is 50.07% down from its all-time high of $59.39 and 826.7% up from its all-time low of $3.20.

QWhat does the Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicate about the HYPE market?

AThe Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicates a neutral level, being at the 50.19 mark.

QWhat is the market capitalization of the Hyperliquid (HYPE) token?

AThe market capitalization of the Hyperliquid (HYPE) token is $7.76 billion.

Похожее

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

In the race to dominate the AI era's entry point, China's tech giants—Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba—are aggressively deploying AI Agents to control the future of traffic distribution. Alibaba is pursuing a dual-track "closed loop + openness" strategy. Its Qianwen app is evolving into a super-Agent integrated across its ecosystem (Taobao, Alipay, etc.) to handle complex tasks like travel planning. Concurrently, it is opening its platform to external brands (Luckin Coffee, KFC) and has launched a B2B Agent platform, "Wukong," targeting enterprise automation. Its other flagship, Quark, aims to be an "AI super search box" for information and tasks. ByteDance is executing an omnipresent "sprawl strategy." Its Doubao app boasts over 300 million monthly active users and is evolving into a default AI entry point for daily life, with plans for paid versions and e-commerce integration. Its core weapon is the Kouzi platform, a visual "AI assembly factory" for developers to build custom Agents. ByteDance is also pushing hardware integration, collaborating on AI phones and developing smart glasses to embed Doubao everywhere. Tencent is playing its long-held "ultimate card" by quietly embedding an AI Agent directly into WeChat. This Agent, accessible via a swipe, can understand user commands and automatically execute tasks by calling upon WeChat's millions of mini-programs (e.g., finding and ordering coffee). This leverages WeChat's unparalleled 1.4-billion-user ecosystem to position the app as an AI-powered "service operating system," a move that could dramatically reshape the competitive landscape. The core battleground is shifting from competing for "user screen time" to competing to be the "default execution layer" for user intent. The business model is evolving from an "attention economy" to an "intent economy," where the Agent that can most efficiently fulfill a user's need gains control over service access and token flow. This represents a fundamental change in how users connect with digital services, making the fight for the Agent入口 (entry point) a pivotal moment for redefining industry leadership in the AI age.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

marsbit1 ч. назад

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

The article explores the sudden shift in WeChat's strategy towards AI assistants from mobile phone manufacturers, transitioning from strict opposition to active collaboration. For over a year, WeChat fiercely resisted attempts by phone AI assistants (like ByteDance's Doubao in late 2025) to control its features via GUI automation ("simulated clicking"), citing security and data control concerns. This stance created a significant barrier for system-level AI integration. Now, Tencent has initiated A2A (Agent-to-Agent) partnerships with major phone brands like Honor, Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo. This model allows a phone's system AI (e.g., Honor's YOYO) to parse a user's voice command and send a structured request directly to WeChat's own internal AI agent via secure APIs. WeChat then executes the action (e.g., sending a message) and returns the result. The article attributes Tencent's "change of face" to strategic pressure. While leading in social app usage, Tencent trails rivals like ByteDance and Alibaba in standalone AI app popularity. WeChat, with its vast mini-program ecosystem, is Tencent's key asset for an AI comeback. The upcoming WeChat AI agent aims to handle tasks like booking and payments within the app. However, phone system assistants remain the primary AI entry point for most users. The A2A collaboration allows Tencent to extend WeChat's AI reach to this crucial system layer while maintaining control over its core functions and data. For phone manufacturers, embracing A2A is a pragmatic move. The GUI route proved unviable due to WeChat's blocks. A2A offers a compliant path to integrate a vital service, enhancing their AI assistants' usefulness. It allows them to focus on developing their own AI ecosystems for other services while cooperating on WeChat access. The collaboration is framed as a mutual, strategic necessity: Tencent gains a distribution channel, and manufacturers gain a key functionality. The partnership relies on a "dual authorization" mechanism for security, requiring both user and app consent for each action. While questions about long-term data privacy practices remain, experts note A2A is more secure and compliant than GUI automation. Ultimately, this cooperation is seen as a tentative, calculated truce. Tencent's long-term goal is to make WeChat an AI-powered "service OS." Phone manufacturers aim to make their system AI the central user interface. Their paths may converge or clash in the future, but for now, the A2A deal represents the opening chapter in the battle for the AI-era user入口, driven by necessity and strategic calculus on both sides.

marsbit3 ч. назад

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

marsbit3 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片