HashKey Lists XAUt, Marking First Gold Token Trading on a Compliant Exchange in Hong Kong

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-15Обновлено 2026-01-15

Введение

HashKey Exchange, the largest licensed digital asset exchange in Hong Kong and a subsidiary of HashKey Holdings Limited (3887.HK), has officially listed Tether Gold (XAUt). Professional investors can trade XAUt through its over-the-counter (OTC) Marketplace. This marks the first time a licensed exchange in Hong Kong offers compliant trading of gold tokens. Each XAUt token represents one troy ounce of a physical gold bar that meets the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) delivery standard. By holding XAUt, users gain exposure to physical gold without the logistical challenges of storage and transfer. The introduction of XAUt allows professional investors to hedge against market volatility by allocating part of their portfolio to gold without leaving the HashKey platform. This move integrates traditional safe-haven assets into the digital asset ecosystem, providing a diversified and compliant investment option and bridging traditional and digital finance. Michelle Cheng, Director of HashKey Exchange, stated that the listing addresses inefficiencies in traditional gold allocation, enabling users to manage gold as easily as other digital assets. This is a concrete step toward improving the efficiency of real-world asset (RWA) circulation within a regulated digital environment.

HashKey Exchange, the largest* licensed digital asset trading platform in Hong Kong under listed company HashKey Holdings Limited (3887.HK), has officially listed Tether Gold (XAUt). Professional investors can trade it via the over-the-counter (OTC) bulk trading Marketplace interface. This move signifies the first compliant trading of gold, a traditional safe-haven asset, on a licensed exchange in Hong Kong.

Tether Gold (XAUt) is a gold-backed product issued by Tether, with each XAUt token representing one troy ounce of a gold bar that meets the delivery standards of the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). By holding XAUt, users can own gold in the form of an on-chain digital token, eliminating the inconveniences associated with the delivery, storage, and transfer of physical gold.

During periods of market volatility, professional investors often need to allocate safe-haven assets to hedge risks. With the listing of XAUt on HashKey Exchange, investors can directly allocate their digital assets to gold through HashKey's OTC mechanism without switching platforms, facilitating asset allocation.

By introducing XAUt, HashKey Exchange has not only incorporated gold, a traditional safe-haven asset, into the digital asset trading ecosystem for the first time, providing investors with diversified and compliant asset allocation options, but it has also taken a key step in bridging traditional finance and digital finance.

Michelle Cheng, Director of HashKey Exchange, stated: "In traditional investment environments, gold often requires separate accounts or offline channels for allocation, making it difficult to adjust promptly during market fluctuations. We aim to promote the more efficient circulation of Real World Assets (RWA), represented by gold, in the digital environment. With the listing of XAUt, users can buy, sell, and convert gold just like managing other digital assets. This is a concrete implementation of our efforts to address the challenges of gold allocation within a compliant framework."

About HashKey Exchange

HashKey Exchange is a digital asset exchange under listed company HashKey Holdings Limited (3887.HK), committed to setting new benchmarks for virtual asset exchanges in terms of compliance, fund security, and platform safety. Hash Blockchain Limited (HashKey Exchange) is one of the first licensed retail virtual asset exchanges in Hong Kong. It has obtained approval from the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong to hold licenses for Type 1 (dealing in securities) and Type 7 (providing automated trading services) under the Securities and Futures Ordinance, as well as a license to operate a virtual asset trading platform under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance, enabling it to operate a virtual asset trading platform in compliance with regulations. HashKey Exchange has obtained ISO 27001 (information security) and ISO 27701 (data privacy) management system certifications. To comply with laws and regulations, HashKey Exchange does not provide services to users in Mainland China, the United States, and certain other jurisdictions.

HashKey Exchange News Release and Advertising Standard Terms and Disclaimer

* As of January 15, 2026, HashKey Exchange is ranked 17th on CoinGecko, making it the highest-ranked licensed virtual asset exchange in Hong Kong.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is XAUt and what does each token represent?

AXAUt is a gold-backed token issued by Tether. Each XAUt token represents ownership of one troy ounce of a physical gold bar that meets the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) Good Delivery standards.

QOn which exchange was XAUt officially listed, and what is significant about this listing?

AXAUt was officially listed on HashKey Exchange. This is significant because it marks the first time a gold token is available for compliant trading on a licensed exchange in Hong Kong.

QHow can professional investors trade XAUt on HashKey Exchange?

AProfessional investors can trade XAUt through the over-the-counter (OTC) bulk trading Marketplace interface on HashKey Exchange.

QAccording to HashKey Exchange Director Michelle Cheng, what problem does the listing of XAUt help solve?

AAccording to Michelle Cheng, the listing of XAUt helps solve the problem of the difficulty in调度 (scheduling/allocating) gold in a timely manner during market volatility by allowing users to buy, sell, and convert gold just like managing other digital assets within a compliant system.

QWhat type of licenses does HashKey Exchange hold from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC)?

AHashKey Exchange holds a Type 1 (dealing in securities) license and a Type 7 (providing automated trading services) license under the Securities and Futures Ordinance, as well as a license to operate a virtual asset trading platform under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance.

Похожее

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit41 мин. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit41 мин. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit46 мин. назад

marsbit46 мин. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit51 мин. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit51 мин. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit52 мин. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit52 мин. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit1 ч. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion