FTX Lawyers Pay $54M In Settlement Over Services Rendered To Exchange – Details

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-05-25Обновлено 2026-05-25

Введение

U.S. law firm Fenwick & West has agreed to pay $54 million to settle claims from FTX customers who alleged the firm facilitated the crypto exchange's fraud. The settlement, pending court approval, resolves accusations that the lawyers helped craft regulatory and operational structures tied to the misuse of customer funds. Fenwick denied any knowledge of FTX's illicit activities. This marks the largest settlement in a second wave of FTX-related class actions, following the exchange's 2022 collapse and the conviction of founder Sam Bankman-Fried. The FTX bankruptcy estate has meanwhile distributed billions to reimburse creditors.

In a noteworthy development, US law firm Fenwick & West has agreed to pay $54 million to settle claims arising from its legal services for the defunct crypto exchange FTX. The proposed settlement, filed in federal court in Miami on Friday, resolves allegations from FTX customers who accused the Silicon Valley-based firm of facilitating misconduct tied to one of the largest financial frauds in US history.

Fenwick Denies Knowledge Of FTX Illicit Activities Despite Settlement

According to court filings as reported by Reuters, Fenwick & West served as a lead outside counsel for FTX during the exchange’s rapid expansion into a global crypto trading platform. Plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit alleged the firm “helped to craft and implement strategies that facilitated FTX’s fraud,” accusing the lawyers of assisting with regulatory and operational structures later tied to the misuse of customer funds.

The proposed settlement agreement still requires approval from US District Judge K. Michael Moore in Miami. Attorneys representing FTX customers, including prominent litigator David Boies, argued the deal was reasonable and would prevent prolonged and costly litigation.

However, Fenwick rejected allegations that it knowingly participated in fraudulent conduct. In a public statement, the law firm said it “was not aware of the fraud at FTX,” adding that it stood by the integrity of its legal work. The $54 million agreement marks the largest settlement in a second wave of FTX-related class action resolutions.

Other settlements include an $11.75 million payment from former FTX auditor Prager Metis and a $420,000 settlement involving former Miami Heat player Udonis Haslem, who promoted the exchange.

The Journey So Far

FTX collapsed in November 2022 after revelations that an estimated $11- $13 billion in customer funds had allegedly been diverted to its sister trading firm, Alameda Research. The exchange’s bankruptcy triggered widespread panic across the digital asset market and erased $200 billion in global crypto market cap.

In 2024, founder Sam Bankman-Fried was convicted on fraud and conspiracy charges and sentenced to 25 years in prison. Although he pleaded not guilty and has since appealed the conviction, claiming the initial trial was unfairly prejudiced against him.

Meanwhile, the FTX Recovery Trust has continued efforts to reimburse affected creditors under the company’s Chapter 11 restructuring process. In March 2026, the estate announced a fourth distribution of approximately $2.2 billion, bringing cumulative repayments to eligible claimants close to $10 billion. Several customer classes, including many US-based users, have reportedly reached full or near-full recovery levels under the court-approved repayment plan.

Total crypto market cap valued at $2.55 trillion on the daily chart | Source: TOTAL chart on Tradingview.com

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhich law firm agreed to pay $54 million to settle claims related to its services for FTX?

AThe US law firm Fenwick & West agreed to pay $54 million to settle the claims.

QWhat were the allegations against Fenwick & West in the class action lawsuit by FTX customers?

AThe plaintiffs alleged that Fenwick & West helped to craft and implement strategies that facilitated FTX's fraud, assisting with regulatory and operational structures tied to the misuse of customer funds.

QHow did Fenwick & West respond to the allegations of knowingly participating in FTX's fraud?

AFenwick & West rejected the allegations, stating in a public statement that it was not aware of the fraud at FTX and stood by the integrity of its legal work.

QWhat was the fate of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried as mentioned in the article?

ASam Bankman-Fried was convicted on fraud and conspiracy charges in 2024 and sentenced to 25 years in prison. He pleaded not guilty and has appealed the conviction.

QWhat is the reported cumulative repayment amount to eligible claimants from the FTX Recovery Trust as of the article's information?

AAs of the article's information, cumulative repayments to eligible claimants were close to $10 billion, following a fourth distribution of approximately $2.2 billion announced in March 2026.

Похожее

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbit37 мин. назад

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbit37 мин. назад

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit57 мин. назад

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit57 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片