Fed Regional Presidents Secure Rare 'Unanimous Reappointment', Crypto-Friendly Faction Holds Key Positions, 2025 Monetary Policy Tone Initially Set

marsbitОпубликовано 2025-12-12Обновлено 2025-12-12

Введение

The Federal Reserve Board unanimously approved the reappointment of 11 regional Federal Reserve Bank presidents for five-year terms, effective March 1 next year. The only exception is the Atlanta Fed president, who previously announced his retirement. This rare unanimous decision, which includes support from all three Trump-appointed governors, resolves a key uncertainty regarding the future composition of the Fed’s monetary policy committee. The reappointments follow comprehensive evaluations by regional boards and come amid speculation that the process could have been contentious due to efforts by Trump-appointed officials to push for major changes at the central bank. The regional Fed presidents, selected by local boards but requiring approval from the Washington-based Board of Governors, hold significant operational responsibilities and rotating voting rights on the Federal Open Market Committee. Their terms are set to expire in early 2026. Meanwhile, markets await the White House's announcement of a successor to Chair Jerome Powell, whose term ends in May 2025, with Trump’s close economic adviser Kevin Hassett seen as a likely candidate.

The Federal Reserve announced on Thursday that its Board of Governors has voted to reappoint all 11 regional Federal Reserve Bank presidents for five-year terms, effective March 1 of next year. The only exception is the President of the Atlanta Fed, who had previously announced his retirement.

The Fed stated that the reappointments were made following a comprehensive evaluation of the regional bank presidents by their respective boards of directors and received the "unanimous consent" of the Board of Governors.

By law, all regional Fed presidents and first vice presidents serve five-year terms. The current terms are set to expire on February 28, 2026. This move resolves a key question regarding the future composition of the Fed's monetary policy committee.

This matter is significant because some central bank watchers had speculated that this once-every-five-year reappointment process could be more contentious than usual, as Trump-appointed governors sought major changes to the national central bank. The vote on the continuation of the current regional Fed presidents' positions also gained importance following the resignation of Fed Governor Adriana Kugler and Trump's attempt to remove Fed Governor Lisa Cook in August.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has stated that he would push for new residency requirements for future regional presidents, mandating they must have lived in their district for at least three years. Regional Fed presidents can still be removed at any time by a majority vote of the Board for cause, but this reauthorization vote removes any potential immediate threat to their positions.

Notably, the mention of "unanimous consent" from the Board implies that the three Trump-appointed governors also supported these reappointment decisions.

It is important to understand that the presidents of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks serve within a unique public-private hybrid structure. They are selected by independent boards of directors composed of local community members, but their appointments must be approved by the Washington-based, President-appointed Board of Governors. They bear significant management and operational responsibilities and hold rotating voting rights on the interest-rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee (the New York Fed president has a permanent vote).

Their terms are five years, all ending in February of years ending in '1' and '6', meaning their current terms are set to expire early next year. Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic recently announced he will retire at the end of his term in February.

Financial markets are still waiting for the White House to announce whom Trump has chosen to succeed Powell, whose term as Fed Chair ends in May next year. Trump's close economic advisor, Kevin Hassett, is seen as the most likely successor.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the key decision made by the Federal Reserve Board regarding regional Fed presidents, and when does it take effect?

AThe Federal Reserve Board voted unanimously to reappoint 11 regional Federal Reserve presidents for five-year terms, effective March 1 next year.

QWhy was the unanimous approval of the Fed Board for these reappointments considered significant in the political context?

AIt was significant because it indicated that even the three Trump-appointed governors supported the reappointments, despite previous speculation about potential upheaval and efforts to impose major changes at the central bank.

QWhich Federal Reserve president is the exception to the reappointment and why?

AAtlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic is the exception, as he had previously announced his retirement, which will take effect at the end of his current term in February next year.

QWhat unique structure do the 12 regional Federal Reserve presidents serve under, and what is their role in monetary policy?

AThey serve under a unique public-private hybrid structure, selected by independent boards of directors from local communities but appointed with approval from the Washington-based Board of Governors. They have significant management and operational responsibilities and hold rotating voting rights on the interest rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee, with the New York Fed president having a permanent vote.

QWho is seen as the most likely successor to Chair Powell when his term ends next May, according to the article?

AKevin Hassett, a close economic adviser to Trump, is viewed as the most likely successor to Chair Jerome Powell.

Похожее

Gary Yang: Agent Economy and AI Submicroeconomics

**Title:** Agent Economy and AI Sub-Microeconomics - Gary Yang **Summary:** Following the AI singularity, the pace of evolution has accelerated rapidly, creating new generational disparities in technological advancement globally. While many regions are still grappling with single-agent bottlenecks, Silicon Valley has moved ahead into the next dimension: the Agent Economy and A2A ecosystems. The article outlines six key areas of this emerging paradigm: 1. **AI Payment Competition & H2A Bottlenecks:** A fierce battle for AI Agent payment protocol standards is underway (e.g., MPP, x402). However, most current efforts remain Human-to-Agent (H2A), essentially grafting AI onto traditional human-centric commerce, which creates a non-AI-native bottleneck. The true potential lies in Agent-to-Agent (A2A) autonomous economies. 2. **Agent Economy & the Inevitable A2A Trend:** The Agent Economy is defined by autonomous AI Agents creating, exchanging, and capitalizing value as independent economic actors. The A2A ecosystem describes their interactions. This represents the next major investment frontier, akin to the early days of e-commerce or DeFi, but with faster iteration and an AI-native, efficiency-first perspective that often diverges from human needs. 3. **AI Protocol vs. Crypto Protocol:** AI Protocols are the foundational rules for Agent interaction in an open network (communication, discovery, collaboration), akin to the governance and economic laws of the AI world. Currently, they focus on communication and weak boundaries, unlike Crypto Protocols which emphasize asset rights and clear ownership. While they appear different due to political-economic factors and legacy system constraints, their eventual convergence into a unified Digital Protocol system is seen as inevitable, driven by first principles. 4. **AI Agent Sub-Microeconomics & Biological Analogy:** AI Agent economics differ fundamentally from human economics: higher frequency/lower value transactions, energy/value direct correlation, efficiency-driven (not emotional) decisions, task-oriented (not consumption-oriented) behavior, and near-zero organizational/communication costs. A powerful analogy frames the Agent economy as a biological system: the LLM is the nucleus, the Agent harness is the cytoplasm, the Agent itself is a cell, its communication protocol is the cell membrane, and external tools (Skills, Prompts) are the extracellular environment. 5. **The Inevitability of AIFi & FinChip:** AIFi (AI Finance) represents the financial system where AI-native value within the Agent economy is tokenized and exchanged. Unlike TradFi/DeFi where value resides *in* finance, in AIFi, value originates *in* AI, and finance becomes its form. This shift is enabled by Agents taking over value discovery. FinChip (Financial Chip) is introduced as a key infrastructure—a fusion of AI autonomy and crypto smart contracts—forming intelligent financial assets to power the future A2A economy. 6. **AI-Native as a Paradigm Shift:** Adopting AI is not akin to "Internet+". It requires AI-Native thinking—designing systems based on first principles, the shortest energy-value path, and maximum efficiency. This abstract, counter-intuitive logic poses a significant, ongoing challenge for all practitioners, as effective, generalized upgrade methodologies will be slow to emerge in this rapidly evolving landscape.

链捕手40 мин. назад

Gary Yang: Agent Economy and AI Submicroeconomics

链捕手40 мин. назад

From 'The Big Short' to San Francisco: The Revelry and Dizziness Within the AI Bubble

From "The Big Short" to San Francisco: The Frenzy and Dizziness in the AI Bubble The article captures the intense, frenetic atmosphere in San Francisco, the epicenter of the current AI boom. Drawing a parallel to the "smell of money" from *The Big Short*, the author observes a city gripped by a singular status game centered entirely on AI and technology. This manifests in a palpable, caffeine-fueled anxiety ("people are shaking"), rampant comparison using vanity metrics like funding rounds, and pervasive "Big Bubble Behavior." The piece explores the city's stark contrasts: its dystopian streets versus beautiful vistas, and the disconnect between the doomsday concerns of some AI researchers and the optimistic, growth-focused "GTM" teams. It critiques the obsession with "math genius" founders as the new ticket to outsized returns, akin to scouting sports prodigies. Referencing economic historian Carlota Perez's "frenzy phase" and Karl Polanyi's "double movement," the author frames the boom as a period where financial speculation detaches from fundamentals, with society potentially becoming subordinate to a new economic force driven by "geniuses in data centers." Ultimately, while acknowledging the unprecedented wealth creation and party-like energy, the article concludes with cautionary advice: when the music is playing, you should dance, but don't get drunk. The core reminder is to stay grounded, avoid distorted judgment, and maintain perspective amidst the euphoria.

marsbit42 мин. назад

From 'The Big Short' to San Francisco: The Revelry and Dizziness Within the AI Bubble

marsbit42 мин. назад

Is AI Creating a New Class of 'Information Poor'?

AI is generating a new kind of "information poverty." The core issue isn't that AI denies answers to the poor; it's that it provides abundant, cheap, and plausible-sounding answers to everyone. This availability shifts the true scarcity from obtaining answers to possessing the **judgment to evaluate them** and the access to turn them into real-world opportunities. New information poverty thus describes those who have AI tools and outputs, but lack the complementary skills, authorization, and contextual experience to critically assess and act on them. Research reveals a multi-layered divide: access to AI is stratified by income and platform design (e.g., premium vs. free, embedded tools). In workplaces, usage heavily favors higher-paid, more experienced, or formally trained employees, with AI often automating entry-level tasks that were traditional stepping stones. Crucially, the heaviest users are often mid-career professionals whose existing expertise allows them to effectively judge and leverage AI outputs, while novices risk over-relying on them without building judgment. While controlled experiments show AI can significantly boost low-skilled workers' performance, real-world adoption and benefit are constrained by unequal social and organizational structures. Historically, general-purpose technologies first reward those with existing complementary capital. AI, by affecting judgment-based work, may accelerate and deepen this initial inequality gap, even if it narrows over decades. The danger lies in the illusion of competence it creates, potentially stunting the very critical thinking needed in an era where judgment is paramount.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Is AI Creating a New Class of 'Information Poor'?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbit2 ч. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片