‘Disappointing’: U.S. DoJ seeks retrial of Tornado Cash founder

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-10Обновлено 2026-03-10

Введение

The U.S. Department of Justice is seeking a retrial of Tornado Cash founder Roman Storm on charges of money laundering and sanctions violations, a move that has drawn strong criticism from the crypto community. Storm was previously found guilty only of operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business. The DeFi community, including the DeFi Education Fund and Solana Policy Institute, expressed disappointment, arguing the case threatens legal protections for software developers. They point to a recent court ruling that exempted developers from liability on non-custodial platforms. Critics also accuse the DoJ of contradicting the U.S. Treasury's stance and undermining crypto innovation. Despite the negative news, Tornado Cash’s native token TORN saw a 4% price increase.

U.S. government agencies are eliciting conflicting views on crypto mixers and DeFi software developers.

The above rift has become evident in the latest push by the Department of Justice (DoJ) to retry the Tornado Cash founder, Roman Storm.

In a letter sent to the Southern District of New York’s (SDNY) Judge Katherine Polk Failla, the DoJ requested the retrial to begin in October 2026.

Community opposes DoJ’s push for retrial

However, the DeFi and crypto community has raised concerns about the planned retrial.

In particular, Amanda Tuminelli, chief legal officer and executive director at lobby group DeFi Education Fund, billed the update as ‘incredibly disappointing news.’

Last year, Tornado Cash founder Roman Storm was charged with three counts: conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business (MTB), money laundering, and violations of sanctions.

But he was only found guilty of running an unlicensed MTB, which attracted a five-year jail sentence. However, the jury was undecided on the two other counts, and each could fetch a 20-year sentence if Storm is found guilty. These are the charges the DoJ is seeking to retry.

Moreover, Roman Storm criticized SDNY prosecutors for overstepping their role, undermining President Donald Trump’s crypto agenda, and disregarding the U.S. Treasury’s latest directive.

Here, Storm was referring to the U.S. Treasury’s latest report on crypto mixers, which characterized the products as ‘unlawful.’

“Lawful users of digital assets may leverage mixers to enable financial privacy when transacting through public blockchains.”

DeFi developers’ protections at risk

Similarly, a recent landmark Uniswap ruling established that scammers were liable for any wrongdoing and losses incurred on non-custodial platforms.

The ruling exempted developers from legal liability and, by extension, was viewed by many policy watchers as a positive sign for DeFi. In fact, the Unsiwap ruling was issued by Judge Failla, who is handling the Storm case.

However, the DoJ’s push for a retrial runs counter to the above ruling and the U.S. Treasury statement, further putting DeFi developers’ protection in limbo.

Reacting to the update, Solana Policy Institute’s CEO Miller Whitehouse-Levine called the retrial push ‘depressing’ but vowed to support Storm.

For his part, David Hoffman of Bankless pleaded with the Trump Administration to drop the charges against Storm.

“If the USA wants to be the Crypto Capital of the world, we need to protect our open-source developers. Please simply pardon Roman Storm from a charge leftover from the Biden admin.”

Interestingly, TORN, Tornado Cash’s native token, surged 4% despite the negative update.


Final Summary

  • The DoJ is pushing for the retrial of Roman Storm for sanctions violations and money laundering.
  • The crypto community expressed disappointment with the update as software developers’ protections hang in the balance.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat are the three charges that Tornado Cash founder Roman Storm was originally facing?

ARoman Storm was originally charged with three counts: conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business (MTB), money laundering, and violations of sanctions.

QWhy is the DeFi and crypto community concerned about the Department of Justice's push for a retrial?

AThe community is concerned because the retrial push runs counter to a recent landmark Uniswap ruling that exempted developers from legal liability, putting the protections for DeFi software developers in jeopardy.

QWhat was the outcome of Roman Storm's initial trial, and which charge was he found guilty of?

AIn the initial trial, the jury found Roman Storm guilty of running an unlicensed money-transmitting business (MTB), which carries a five-year jail term. The jury was undecided on the charges of money laundering and sanctions violations.

QHow did the U.S. Treasury's latest report characterize crypto mixers, and what did it say about their lawful users?

AThe U.S. Treasury's latest report characterized crypto mixers as 'unlawful.' However, it also noted that 'Lawful users of digital assets may leverage mixers to enable financial privacy when transacting through public blockchains.'

QWho is the judge presiding over the Roman Storm case, and why is her previous ruling significant in this context?

AJudge Katherine Polk Failla of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) is presiding over the case. She is significant because she issued the recent Uniswap ruling that established developers are not liable for scams on non-custodial platforms, a decision that contrasts with the DoJ's push for a retrial against Storm.

Похожее

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbit40 мин. назад

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbit40 мин. назад

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit7 ч. назад

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit7 ч. назад

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手7 ч. назад

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手7 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片