Crypto Market Structure Bill Nears Key Moment As CFTC Chair Signals Progress Within Months

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-02-04Обновлено 2026-02-04

Введение

Newly appointed CFTC Chair Michael Selig advocates for the passage of the crypto market structure bill (CLARITY Act), arguing it could establish the U.S. as the global "gold standard" in crypto regulation. He emphasizes that the legislation would provide long-needed clarity by defining a token taxonomy and clarifying regulatory jurisdictions, challenging the current approach of treating most digital assets as securities. Selig believes the bill could reach President Trump's desk within months, aided by executive support. Meanwhile, Senate Democrats are planning a closed-door meeting to discuss the bill, which recently stalled in the Senate Banking Committee due to industry opposition, despite passing in the Agriculture Committee.

As uncertainty grows around the fate of the crypto market structure bill (CLARITY Act), newly appointed Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chair Michael Selig is making a strong case for its passage.

Selig argues that the legislation moving through Congress could position the United States as the global benchmark — or “gold standard” — for crypto regulation, addressing what he described as years of regulatory ambiguity that have held the industry back.

Clear Crypto Rules Could Arrive Within Months

Speaking in an interview with FOX Business, Selig said the US has long suffered from a lack of clear oversight for digital assets, forcing innovation and capital to move offshore.

He explained that the proposed crypto market structure legislation is designed to introduce long‐needed clarity by defining a “token taxonomy” and clearly outlining which regulators have authority over different parts of the crypto market.

For the first time, he added, developers and investors may soon have a framework that clearly defines what qualifies as a security, what does not, and how digital assets should be treated under US law.

Selig also challenged the approach of treating nearly all digital assets as securities, calling it outdated. He argued that many cryptocurrencies function more like commodities and should therefore fall under the CFTC’s jurisdiction rather than being regulated exclusively by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Looking ahead, Selig said he believes the market structure bill could reach President Donald Trump’s desk within the next couple of months. He also praised the president’s leadership and vocal support of the crypto sector, suggesting that executive backing could help push the legislation across the finish line.

Senate Democrats Plan Closed‐Door Meeting

Meanwhile, activity is picking up on Capitol Hill. Crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett reported on X (formerly Twitter) that Senate Democrats are planning to reconvene for a closed‐door meeting on crypto market structure.

The meeting, expected to take place this week, would mark the first member‐level Democratic caucus discussion on the issue since the Senate Banking Committee postponed its markup last month.

This comes as the delayed markup occurred last month after pushback from the industry. That opposition included crypto exchange Coinbase withdrawing its support over provisions related to tokenized equities, decentralized finance, and stablecoin rewards and yields.

As a result, the bill stalled in the Senate Banking Committee, increasing the uncertainty surrounding its eventual passing schedule, even though the Senate Agriculture Committee’s version of the bill passed during last week’s vote.

The daily chart shows the total digital asset market cap’s drop to $2.5 trillion on Tuesday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main argument made by CFTC Chair Michael Selig in favor of the crypto market structure bill?

AMichael Selig argues that the legislation could position the United States as the global benchmark or 'gold standard' for crypto regulation, addressing years of regulatory ambiguity that have held the industry back and forced innovation and capital to move offshore.

QAccording to Selig, what key definitional framework might the proposed legislation provide for the first time?

AFor the first time, developers and investors may soon have a framework that clearly defines what qualifies as a security, what does not, and how digital assets should be treated under US law.

QWhich regulatory approach does Selig criticize as outdated, and what alternative does he propose?

ASelig criticizes the approach of treating nearly all digital assets as securities as outdated. He argues that many cryptocurrencies function more like commodities and should therefore fall under the CFTC’s jurisdiction rather than being regulated exclusively by the SEC.

QWhat recent development is mentioned regarding Senate Democrats and this legislation?

ASenate Democrats are planning to reconvene for a closed-door meeting on crypto market structure, which would be the first member-level Democratic caucus discussion on the issue since the Senate Banking Committee postponed its markup last month.

QWhy did the Senate Banking Committee's markup of the bill get postponed last month?

AThe markup was postponed after pushback from the industry, including crypto exchange Coinbase withdrawing its support over provisions related to tokenized equities, decentralized finance, and stablecoin rewards and yields.

Похожее

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

The AI Agent era is accelerating, with the CB Insights AI 100 list highlighting global investment confidence. The focus has shifted from whether AI works to its speed of deployment and ability to manage complex workflows, with autonomous AI Agents driving this transformation. At the forefront is Questflow, a Singapore-based startup redefining financial intelligence through its on-chain AI brokerage. Unlike tools that merely provide data dashboards, Questflow deploys AI Agents that proactively scan markets, form judgments, and execute trades via a conversational interface—operating 24/7 without requiring manual confirmation for each decision. This embodies the new AI paradigm of agents capable of executing multi-step workflows autonomously. Questflow's mission is to democratize institutional-grade trading intelligence. Historically reserved for the ultra-wealthy, this capability is now accessible starting from just $1 through Questflow's "AI Clone + Copy Trade" model. The platform charges only a 1% execution fee, aligning its incentives directly with users and eliminating traditional management or performance fees. The timing is opportune, aligning with key trends identified by CB Insights: the scalable deployment of AI Agents, accelerated AI adoption in financial services, and the maturation of on-chain infrastructure. With robust liquidity on platforms like Hyperliquid and Polymarket, alongside advancements in AI reasoning and non-custodial wallet security, Questflow is positioned to merge the roles of broker, fund, and exchange into a single, accessible platform for millions.

链捕手37 мин. назад

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

链捕手37 мин. назад

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbit45 мин. назад

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbit45 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片