Crypto Firm Entropy Calls It Quits, Plans Full Investor Refunds

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-01-27Обновлено 2026-01-27

Введение

Entropy, a crypto startup focused on decentralized custody and automation tools, is shutting down after four years. The company, backed by investors like Andreessen Horowitz and Coinbase Ventures, failed to achieve the growth and scalable business model required by its backers. CEO Tux Pacific announced the decision to wind down operations and return approximately $25–$27 million to investors. Despite multiple pivots and product changes, Entropy struggled to gain sufficient customer traction and revenue. The refund process will be handled formally, making this a relatively clean shutdown compared to other crypto failures. The founder may transition to a new field like medical research.

Entropy, a startup that tried to build a safer way to hold and move crypto, is shutting down and sending most money back to investors.

The company’s leader said the business could not reach the size investors wanted. Reports say the team will return roughly $25–$27 million that had been put into the project.

What Happened To Entropy

According to reports, Entropy began with tools for decentralized custody aimed at big holders who wanted more control.

Over time the group changed course and tried to build automation features that would make crypto workflows easier.

The company raised capital from well-known backers, including Andreessen Horowitz and Coinbase Ventures. It ran for about four years and weathered two rounds of layoffs as the team tested different ideas.

In a Saturday post on X, Entropy founder and CEO Tux Pacific said the crypto automation platform has reached the end of the road after years of trying to find a workable future.

I am winding-up Entropy.

After four years, several pivots, and two rounds of layoffs, I’ve decided to wind-up Entropy and return capital to our investors.

For the latter half of 2025, the Entropy team was hard at work on a crypto automations platform (basically n8n/zapier/etc...

— tux pacific (@__tux) January 24, 2026

Decision To Return Capital

Two clear facts pushed the move. First, buyers and customers did not grow fast enough for the kind of return venture backers expect.

Second, the team struggled to find a steady, repeatable business model that could support rapid growth and hire plans.

Leaders tried product tweaks and new directions, but the pace of change stayed slow and revenue did not climb as hoped. In some cases the product was kept alive by small wins; in others it felt stalled.

BTCUSD now trading at $87,700. Chart: TradingView

Investors will get back most of the money they put in. That makes this shutdown cleaner than some collapses where user funds were at risk.

Reports say refunds will be handled through formal steps and planners are working out the details.

The company’s founder has suggested they may shift their career focus away from crypto, possibly into fields like medical research, though that path is not certain.

Featured image from Pexels, chart from TradingView

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main reason for Entropy's decision to shut down?

AThe business could not reach the size investors wanted, and the team struggled to find a steady, repeatable business model that could support rapid growth and hiring plans.

QHow much capital is Entropy planning to return to its investors?

AThe team will return roughly $25–$27 million that had been put into the project.

QWhich well-known venture capital firms invested in Entropy?

AEntropy raised capital from Andreessen Horowitz and Coinbase Ventures.

QWhat was the final product direction Entropy was working on before shutting down?

AThe company was working on a crypto automations platform, similar to n8n or Zapier, aimed at making crypto workflows easier.

QHow does this shutdown differ from other crypto company collapses?

AThis shutdown is cleaner because investors will get back most of their money, unlike some collapses where user funds were at risk.

Похожее

Bitcoin ETFs Rout Extends To June With $1.72 Billion Net Outflows In First Week

U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs extended their downturn into early June, recording net outflows of approximately $1.72 billion from June 1-5 following a poor May. This trend reflects sustained bearish sentiment, with only one day of positive net inflows in the past 15 trading sessions. BlackRock's IBIT led the withdrawals with $1.34 billion in outflows, while most other major funds also saw redemptions. Total ETF net assets fell over 20% to $75.12 billion. In parallel, Ethereum spot ETFs saw net outflows of $168 million, indicating investor caution amid macroeconomic uncertainty. Bitcoin's price hovered around $61,592 at press time.

bitcoinist54 мин. назад

Bitcoin ETFs Rout Extends To June With $1.72 Billion Net Outflows In First Week

bitcoinist54 мин. назад

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, suffered a historic collapse in price, losing over 50% of its value in 24 hours and erasing billions from its market cap. The dramatic sell-off was triggered by the disclosure of a major vulnerability in the Zcash Orchard privacy pool that had remained undetected since May 2022. A security researcher, using AI, developed a proof-of-concept to generate counterfeit ZEC. While the bug was patched by June 2, Zcash's privacy design makes it impossible to verify if any fake coins were minted before the fix, fueling market panic and uncertainty. This event highlights the trade-off between privacy and transparency. In response, Shielded Labs is exploring a network upgrade to allow supply verification. Despite the crisis, proponents argue that the discovery by world-class security researchers demonstrates the network's commitment to proactive hardening and resilience.

bitcoinist4 ч. назад

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

bitcoinist4 ч. назад

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit5 ч. назад

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit5 ч. назад

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手5 ч. назад

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手5 ч. назад

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit6 ч. назад

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain