Cloudflare CEO: How I Decided Which Employees to Replace with AI?

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-22Обновлено 2026-05-22

Введение

Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince explains his decision to lay off over 20% of the company's staff, despite record-high growth and revenue. He frames this as a necessary adaptation to AI-driven business transformation, drawing on Peter Drucker's framework of three corporate roles: builders, sellers, and measurers. Prince argues AI primarily targets "measurers"—roles in auditing, finance, legal, compliance, middle management, and operations. AI systems can perform these measuring and oversight tasks with superior objectivity, efficiency, and scale, enabling continuous auditing and faster financial processes. This allows for consolidation and automation in these areas. Conversely, "builders" (e.g., engineers) and "sellers" are seen as secure and even more valuable. AI amplifies their productivity, and human relationships remain crucial for sales. The layoffs were not merely cost-cutting but a reallocation of resources to hire more builders and sellers. Prince highlights the company's record number of open roles and its highly AI-native intern class, who are primarily builders and sellers. He concludes that AI will reshape every company by enhancing measurement capabilities, allowing human talent to focus on creating and capturing value through building and selling.

Author: Matthew Prince

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Two weeks ago, I laid off more than 20% of our company's employees. I did not make this decision because Cloudflare was in trouble. On the contrary, our revenue growth has hit a record high, cash flow is ample, and the number of new customers we've acquired globally has reached unprecedented levels. I made this decision because the business environment is undergoing a dramatic shift; and to win in the future, Cloudflare must adapt.

Searching through American business history, you might not find a second publicly traded company like ours that, while maintaining over 30% high growth, also laid off 20% of its staff. However, what we did over the past two weeks will likely become the industry norm within the next year. This is a story about how artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping everything, but unfortunately, many executives and commentators misunderstand how exactly AI will disrupt business rules and who will be impacted.

To figure this out, I reopened an old book published in 1954 (this book is 20 years older than me): Peter Drucker's "The Practice of Management." In this book, Drucker deeply analyzes the various roles within an enterprise. I categorize these roles into three types: builders, sellers, and measurers.

As the names suggest, "builders" are responsible for creating products, and "sellers" are responsible for selling them. "Measurers" encompass everything else: internal audit, revenue recognition (an accounting term referring to the process of determining when a sale can be officially recorded as income on the company's books according to accounting standards), finance, legal, compliance, middle management, daily operations, and so on, to name a few.

Contrary to the pessimistic predictions of some analysts, the jobs of "builders" are very secure and aren't going anywhere. If an engineer on my team could increase their productivity tenfold with the help of AI, I would definitely hire all such talent I could find in the market.

"Sellers" also have no need to worry about being replaced. Because those who control budgets are still living humans, they prefer to buy from people who are willing to take the time to listen to their needs, can build trust, and can provide support when problems arise.

"Measurers" are also crucial to the enterprise, but they are fundamentally different from the first two. Top "measurers" are often worth their weight in gold. They work tirelessly behind the scenes, not seeking the flowers and applause of front-of-house roles (like servers in a restaurant who directly face customers, referring to positions that easily attract external attention and praise); ideally, they can also maintain an objective perspective independent of other company departments. Drucker pointed out that measuring business performance is important, but customers are ultimately won through "building" and "selling." A truly top-tier company should invest the most resources in these two core functions.

The wave of AI is not targeting "builders" or "sellers"; it is truly aimed at "measurers." Tireless, absolutely independent, extremely efficient, and always online—today's AI systems, when measuring and examining a company, achieve a level of objective detail and precision that even the most outstanding employees of the past could not match.

Take Cloudflare, for example. In the past, our internal audit team could only sample a few business risk points for review each quarter. Now, we are fully implementing a new system that conducts continuous, 24/7 audits on every single business risk point. We are closing our books (closing our books, referring to the regular process where a company settles its accounts and issues financial statements at month-end or year-end) faster. We are making fewer mistakes, and even when occasional errors occur, they can be identified more accurately and reliably. As CEO, I now have unprecedented, excellent tools that not only allow me to precisely measure the company's overall operational status but also help me accurately identify rising stars within the team.

The vast majority of the employees we laid off last week were "measurers." We streamlined middle management across the company because, with AI assistance, managers can now oversee more direct reports while still conducting accurate performance evaluations and providing effective guidance. We consolidated scattered operational roles into a unified business support group, leveraging AI to fill gaps when specific expertise is needed. We also significantly reduced the marketing team—like most companies, it was once a heavy concentration area for "measurers." Furthermore, within the entire finance team, we found ample opportunities to consolidate roles and automate tasks.

However, the fundamental purpose of this layoff was absolutely not simply to reduce headcount. In fact, the number of open positions we are currently hiring for has reached a record high. I expect our total employee count to continue growing in the coming years. Precisely because the work of "measuring" no longer requires as much manpower, we can now free up resources to heavily invest in the talent that truly drives company growth.

This summer, we received nearly one million resumes competing for 1,111 paid internship positions. The interns we finally hired are not only exceptionally outstanding but also naturally AI-native (AI-native, referring to the new generation who grew up in the AI era, naturally adapting to and viewing AI as a mindset and fundamental tool). Without exception, they are all "builders" or "sellers," and we expect the vast majority of them to ultimately receive full-time offers.

They are the new generation of the future, who will invent new ways to power our business. Thanks to AI, we can now more precisely measure their contributions and accurately identify those future leaders. AI is by no means a harbinger of disaster leading to bleak unemployment for young people—quite the opposite is true.

AI will not end all jobs, but it will inevitably reshape every business. In the end, time will prove Drucker right. AI will greatly enhance our ability to measure our organization, so that the living humans on our team can focus all their energy on where they can truly create and capture value: building and selling.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to the article, why did the Cloudflare CEO decide to lay off more than 20% of employees despite strong company performance?

AHe did it because the business environment is changing drastically, and Cloudflare must adapt to win the future. The decision was driven by how artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping business rules, specifically targeting certain types of roles.

QBased on Peter Drucker's framework mentioned in the article, what are the three types of roles within a company, and which are most safe from AI disruption?

AThe three roles are Builders (who make products), Sellers (who sell products), and Measurers (who handle internal audit, finance, legal, compliance, operations, etc.). According to the CEO, Builders and Sellers are very safe, as their jobs are not threatened by AI. The AI wave is primarily aimed at Measurers.

QHow has AI specifically changed the work of 'Measurers' at Cloudflare, according to the CEO?

AAI has enabled continuous, around-the-clock auditing of every business risk point, faster financial book closing, fewer and more precisely caught errors, and provided the CEO with superior tools to measure company performance and identify rising talent. This increased efficiency and objectivity reduced the need for many human Measurers.

QWhat was the ultimate goal of the layoffs, and what is Cloudflare's hiring outlook?

AThe ultimate goal was not simply to reduce headcount. It was to reallocate resources toward roles that drive growth. Cloudflare currently has a record number of open roles, and the CEO expects total employee count to grow in the coming years. The savings from automating 'Measurement' allow the company to invest heavily in more Builders and Sellers.

QWhat does the CEO say about the new generation of 'AI-native' interns and the future of work with AI?

AHe states that the new generation of AI-native interns are exceptionally talented and are inherently Builders or Sellers. He sees AI not as a disaster causing unemployment but as a tool that will reshape every business. AI will enhance the ability to measure an organization, allowing humans to focus their energy where they truly create and capture value: building and selling.

Похожее

Alibaba 'Stocks Up', ByteDance 'Trains'

"In late May, two closely timed events in China's AI industry clearly revealed the divergent strategic approaches of two tech giants: Alibaba and ByteDance. Alibaba is aggressively integrating AI into its existing commercial ecosystem, prioritizing immediate monetization. Its Qwen App now fully integrates with Taobao, leveraging the platform's 4-billion-item database for AI-powered shopping features like virtual try-on and price comparison. Internally, Alibaba has reorganized to incentivize AI-driven business growth, notably through the 'Agentic Commerce Trust Protocol' to enable AI-agent transactions. Financially, it emphasizes ROI, with CEO Daniel Wu stating every AI chip purchased is generating revenue. Alibaba's strategy bets that foundational AI model capabilities won't be leapfrogged in the next five years, allowing its 'AI-as-a-utility' approach to succeed. In stark contrast, ByteDance's Seed division focuses on pushing the frontiers of AGI with a long-term, research-oriented mindset. Its video generation model, Seedance 2.0, topped international benchmarks. The division, led by researchers Wu Yonghui and product head Zhu Wenjia, is tasked with 'exploring the upper limits of intelligence,' even considering open-sourcing its models—a rare move among Chinese firms. ByteDance is investing heavily, with reports of its 2026 capital expenditure plan being nearly triple that of 2024, funded by its substantial private profits. This allows it to pursue projects like an 8-month research paper questioning if video models are true 'world models,' devoid of immediate commercial pressure. The core divergence is less about corporate philosophy and more about structural constraints. As a publicly traded company, Alibaba is bound to quarterly financial expectations, forcing a pragmatic, revenue-focused AI integration. As a private entity, ByteDance has the luxury to fund long-term, high-risk foundational research without answering to public markets. The article concludes that the true determinant of a Chinese company's AI path is its IPO status, suggesting that if ByteDance were public, or if Alibaba were private, their strategies might well be reversed."

marsbit41 мин. назад

Alibaba 'Stocks Up', ByteDance 'Trains'

marsbit41 мин. назад

Why More AI Agents Does Not Equal Higher Productivity?

Editor's Note: As AI Agents become cheaper and easier to use, a new constraint emerges: the cost isn't in launching more Agents, but in the human attention required to manage, judge, and integrate their outputs. This hidden cost is called the "orchestration tax." The article argues that a developer's cognitive bandwidth is the key bottleneck—a serial, non-parallelizable resource akin to a Global Interpreter Lock (GIL). While many Agents can run concurrently, their results ultimately require human judgment for review, conflict resolution, and final integration. Therefore, more Agents don't automatically mean higher productivity; they can simply create longer queues, lead to cognitive fatigue, and create the illusion of busyness without real output. The core solution is to design workflows around this scarce human attention. Key strategies include: scaling the number of Agents to match review capacity (not UI capacity), categorizing tasks (delegating independent ones, keeping complex judgment-heavy ones serial), batch reviewing results to minimize context-switching costs, automating verifiable checks to reserve human judgment for critical decisions, and protecting focused, uninterrupted thinking time. Ultimately, the critical skill is not launching many Agents, but architecting systems that respect the fundamental limit of human attention. Unpaid "orchestration tax" accumulates as both technical and cognitive debt, undermining system understanding and quality. True productivity comes from thoughtfully managing the single-threaded resource—your focus.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Why More AI Agents Does Not Equal Higher Productivity?

marsbit2 ч. назад

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

Three Years Later: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's launch, I made 20 predictions about its future. Now, in mid-2026, I've used AI agents to fact-check each one against the latest data. Overall, most major directional forecasts were correct, with only one outright error (incorrectly stating GPT-4 had 100 trillion parameters). Key successes included predicting that RAG and retrieval architectures would become the standard for handling knowledge and hallucinations, that natural language interfaces (LUI) would create a massive new industry layer beyond the models themselves, and that China would develop viable large language models, significantly closing the performance gap with Western counterparts within about three years. Predictions about the absence of mass unemployment, the rise of a new "robot network" for agent communication, and ChatGPT not possessing consciousness also held true in their core arguments. However, the "devil was in the details." Errors frequently involved specific numbers, timelines, or overlooking distributional effects. I tended to overestimate the speed of adoption (e.g., for agent networks) while underestimating the ultimate scale of capabilities or costs (e.g., AI winning IMO gold without tools, or the extreme capital required for frontier models). Other misjudgments included: underestimating how AI would reinforce, not dissolve, information filter bubbles; incorrectly assuming AI-generated content would easily circumvent copyright (it has instead triggered record-breaking settlements); and misidentifying where value would be captured (it accrued overwhelmingly to the compute layer, like Nvidia, not just the application or model layers). Key lessons from reviewing these predictions are: 1) Directional and mechanistic insights are far more reliable than precise numbers or absolute statements. 2) There's a consistent bias to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude. 3) Errors often lie in missing distributional impacts within a generally correct aggregate trend. 4) Predictions phrased with nuance and caveats aged the best. 5) Some fundamental debates (e.g., on machine consciousness or the ultimate value chain) remain unresolved even after three years. This exercise is less about scoring the past and more about establishing rules for clearer thinking about the next three years of AI.

marsbit8 ч. назад

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

marsbit8 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

2025 год — год институциональных инвесторов, в будущем он будет доминировать в приложениях реального времени.

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.12.16Обновлено 2025.12.16

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на AI (AI) представлены ниже.

活动图片