CLARITY Act Could Unlock Wider Tech Growth In America, Says a16z

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-05-17Обновлено 2026-05-17

Введение

The CLARITY Act, a crypto market structure bill, faces its main hurdle in securing bipartisan Senate support, according to Grayscale. While it advanced from committee with mostly Republican votes, achieving the needed 60 votes will require significant Democratic support. Analysts cite the bipartisan passage of the GENIUS Act as a hopeful precedent. Venture firm a16z argues the bill's impact extends beyond crypto, claiming a clear U.S. legal framework would drive wider domestic innovation and bolster the dollar's global standing. Internationally, the legislation is seen as a regulatory signal for other countries. The outcome now depends on Senate vote counts.

Bipartisan support remains the main obstacle standing between the CLARITY Act and becoming law. That was the assessment from asset management firm Grayscale on Friday, even as the company said it believes the bill has a strong chance of passing.

Republicans hold 53 Senate seats, meaning at least seven Democrats would need to cross the aisle for the legislation to clear the full chamber.

CLARITY Act Advances

The CLARITY Act advanced out of the US Senate Banking Committee last Thursday after a vote that split mostly along party lines. All 13 Republican members voted in favor, joined by two Democrats.

Nine Democrats voted against it. The bill, which aims to give the crypto industry clearer rules around market structure, has been a subject of intense debate since its introduction in July 2025.

Grayscale pointed to the GENIUS Act as a possible guide for what comes next. That stablecoin legislation passed the Senate with 66 votes, including 18 Democrats.

Based on that track record, Grayscale said it believes similar bipartisan backing for the CLARITY Act is achievable, though it acknowledged that several hurdles remain before it can be signed into law.

Broader Economic Stakes

Venture capital firm a16z crypto argued Friday that the implications of the bill go well beyond the crypto sector. According to the firm, giving builders in the US a clear legal framework would drive wider domestic innovation.

BTCUSD now trading at $78,417. Chart: TradingView

It cited the GENIUS Act’s passage as a precedent, saying that legislation produced strong growth and adoption that it described as beneficial not just for the US economy but for the long-term position of the US dollar globally.

The US dollar index, which measures the dollar’s strength against a basket of major currencies, stood at 99.26 at the time of publication, up 1.25% over the prior 30 days, according to TradingView data.

Image: IQ.wiki

Global Signal

Sharplink Gaming CEO Joseph Chalom added another dimension to the conversation, saying the bill is being watched far beyond US borders.

While many see the legislation as a domestic matter, Chalom said other countries are treating it as a signal for how they might approach their own crypto regulations.

A16z framed the broader stakes plainly: when US legal frameworks balance innovation with consumer protection, the country tends to lead and the rest of the world follows.

Whether the Senate delivers that framework is now a question of vote counting.

Featured image from MadebyBaurley, chart from TradingView

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main obstacle for the CLARITY Act to become law according to Grayscale?

ABipartisan support remains the main obstacle for the CLARITY Act to become law.

QHow did the US Senate Banking Committee vote on the CLARITY Act, and what was the party-line split?

AThe CLARITY Act advanced out of the US Senate Banking Committee with all 13 Republican members voting in favor, joined by two Democrats, while nine Democrats voted against it.

QWhat precedent does a16z crypto cite to argue for the potential benefits of the CLARITY Act?

Aa16z crypto cites the passage of the GENIUS Act as a precedent, saying it produced strong growth and adoption beneficial for the US economy and the long-term global position of the US dollar.

QAccording to Sharplink Gaming CEO Joseph Chalom, how are other countries viewing the CLARITY Act?

AJoseph Chalom said that other countries are treating the CLARITY Act as a signal for how they might approach their own crypto regulations, watching it far beyond US borders.

QWhat does a16z crypto argue is the broader implication of passing the CLARITY Act for US innovation?

Aa16z crypto argues that giving builders in the US a clear legal framework through the CLARITY Act would drive wider domestic innovation.

Похожее

Who Funds the Agents?

**Summary: Who Funds AI Agents?** OpenAI recently shut down a feature allowing AI agents to shop for users, highlighting the challenge of creating a secure and regulated environment for agent-driven transactions. While payment infrastructure exists, a crucial governance layer—defining spending limits, fraud detection, tax handling, and return policies—is largely missing. The potential is enormous: AI agents already processed $73M across 176M transactions last year, with McKinsey forecasting this could grow to $3-5T in global consumer commerce by 2030. The core competition isn't just about processing payments, which can be very cheap (especially with crypto-based settlement), but about controlling the rules that govern agent spending. Key players like Stripe and Coinbase are racing to dominate this governance layer. Stripe's acquisition of wallet provider Privy allows it to set spending policies, identity checks, and human-in-the-loop approvals directly at the wallet level. Similarly, Coinbase's stack, including its x402 protocol and AgentKit, embeds governance rules. This vertical integration across settlement, wallet, and governance layers is becoming the dominant strategy. Control over the governance layer is where significant future value lies. If agents handle trillions in transactions, even a small fee for managing compliance, fraud prevention, and policy enforcement could generate billions in annual revenue. The companies that successfully integrate across the payment stack will capture value from idle agent balances, transaction fees, and governance services, positioning themselves as the foundational banks of the AI agent economy.

marsbit27 мин. назад

Who Funds the Agents?

marsbit27 мин. назад

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

**Title: Great Powers Blockade Chips, Giants Buy Nuclear Plants: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI** In May 2026, the US closed loopholes for Chinese firms to acquire advanced NVIDIA chips via overseas subsidiaries. That same month, Kenya halted a $1B geothermal data center project involving Microsoft, fearing its immense energy consumption. Meanwhile, Huawei announced mass production of its Ascend AI chip. These disparate events underscore a new reality: the competition for computing power ("compute") has escalated beyond the tech industry, becoming a geopolitical and infrastructural battleground. A new era of oligopoly is forming, with control over the AI stack—from GPU chips (NVIDIA) and cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) to foundational models (OpenAI, Anthropic)—concentrating in a few Western "AI Octopus" corporations. This centralization creates systemic risks: pricing power and platform lock-in for users, infrastructure fragility, and a widening "compute divide" that threatens to marginalize nations without independent AI capacity. An "AI Iron Curtain" is deepening through export controls. In response, some nations like Saudi Arabia and the UAE are investing heavily to buy compute power, aiming to transition from oil to AI economies. The EU seeks to triple its compute capacity by 2030 to reduce dependency. However, the spending gap is vast, with four US tech giants alone planning ~$750B in AI capex for 2026. The race is increasingly constrained by energy, with AI tasks consuming up to 1000x more power than web searches, pushing firms to even acquire nuclear plants. This landscape is fueling interest in Decentralized AI (DeAI). It proposes a third way: using open protocols to coordinate a global network of idle GPUs, independent developers, and data centers, creating an AI infrastructure without a single controlling entity. Leveraging blockchain and cryptographic verification, DeAI aims to break market concentration, disperse energy demands, reduce geopolitical dependencies, and enhance transparency. While still nascent in performance and stability, DeAI's core promise is not immediate superiority but providing a crucial alternative architecture to resist monopoly, censorship, and centralized power. As specialized AI hardware costs fall and open-source models flourish, the window to build this foundation is open. The very existence of such competition serves as a vital check against the inevitable abuse of concentrated power.

marsbit1 ч. назад

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片