CFTC Expands Advisory Team With Top Coinbase, Ripple Figures

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-02-13Обновлено 2026-02-13

Введение

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has formed a 35-member Innovation Advisory Committee, including prominent crypto industry leaders such as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse. The committee aims to provide the CFTC with up-to-date industry perspectives on derivatives, market structure, and token classification. CFTC Chair Mike Selig stated that the group will help align the agency’s decisions with real market conditions and support the development of clear regulatory guidelines. The committee comprises a diverse mix of crypto executives, DeFi founders, and traditional finance representatives. While the move is seen as a way to improve policy feedback and create workable regulations, some observers caution about potential conflicts of interest. The committee will soon begin meetings focusing on custody, tokenization, derivatives oversight, and market data.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) moved this week to build a new bridge with the crypto industry, naming a 35-member Innovation Advisory Committee that includes top exchange and blockchain leaders.

Reports say the roster gives industry executives a formal line into policy talks, and it lists a mix of crypto founders, exchange bosses and traditional market players.

CFTC Execs Granted A Seat At The Table

Among those tapped are Coinbase chief executive Brian Armstrong and Ripple chief executive Brad Garlinghouse, whose firms have been central to recent debates over how digital assets should be regulated in the US.

The committee’s purpose is to give the regulator up-to-date industry perspective as it considers rules for derivatives, market structure, token classification and other technical issues.

CFTC Chair Mike Selig said Thursday that the committee’s 35 members will help “align the CFTC’s decisions with real market conditions” and allow the commission to “establish clear guidelines for what he called the Golden Age of American Financial Markets.”

What The Roster Looks Like

The membership list reads like a cross-section of the market: centralized exchanges, DeFi founders, trading-venue operators and a handful of established financial firms.

Some reporting highlights that around 20 members have direct ties to crypto firms, while others represent legacy market infrastructure, which creates a mix of viewpoints the commission can tap when drafting guidance or vetting ideas.

Why Industry Leaders Joined

Reports note executives accepted the roles for different reasons. For some, it is an opportunity to press for clearer rules. For others, it may be a way to protect business models as regulators decide which activities fall under commodity rules and which fall under securities laws.

The move follows a period of public lobbying and high-profile disputes over jurisdiction that have left firms searching for predictability.

BTCUSD trading at $66,906 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

Voices And Risks

Giving industry a formal advisory channel can shorten feedback loops. But it also raises questions about how the regulator will manage conflicts and preserve impartiality.

Some observers say close engagement may help craft workable policy that recognizes market realities.

Others warn that heavy industry presence could shape rules in ways that favor incumbents over smaller innovators or the public interest.

Reports say the commission will have to balance open input with careful governance.

What Comes Next

The committee will begin meeting in the coming weeks, and the public will be watching for the topics it raises and the recommendations it produces.

Meetings are likely to focus on custody rules, how tokenized assets are classified, oversight of derivatives, and the handling of market data.

Whether those talks lead to concrete rule proposals will show if this new advisory setup truly shifts how digital asset policy is shaped in the US.

Featured image from V-graphix | Istock | Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the purpose of the CFTC's newly formed Innovation Advisory Committee?

AThe committee's purpose is to give the CFTC up-to-date industry perspective as it considers rules for derivatives, market structure, token classification, and other technical issues, helping to align the regulator's decisions with real market conditions.

QWhich two prominent crypto industry CEOs were named to the committee?

ACoinbase chief executive Brian Armstrong and Ripple chief executive Brad Garlinghouse were named to the committee.

QAccording to the article, what are some of the potential risks of giving the industry a formal advisory role?

AThe risks include potential conflicts of interest and questions about how the regulator will preserve impartiality, with concerns that heavy industry presence could shape rules in ways that favor incumbents over smaller innovators or the public interest.

QWhat are some of the topics the new committee is likely to focus on in its meetings?

AMeetings are likely to focus on custody rules, how tokenized assets are classified, oversight of derivatives, and the handling of market data.

QHow many members are on the new advisory committee, and what is the composition of its membership?

AThe committee has 35 members, which includes a mix of crypto founders, exchange bosses, and traditional market players. Reports highlight that around 20 members have direct ties to crypto firms, while others represent legacy market infrastructure.

Похожее

If Hyperliquid Is the New Nasdaq, Which Projects Are Playing the Role of Brokers?

Amidst sluggish market conditions, several crypto startups are pivoting towards building on the Hyperliquid ecosystem, positioning it as a potential "on-chain Nasdaq." These projects are developing trading frontends, strategy platforms, AI Agents, and custom markets using HIP-3, aiming to capture value by acting as "brokerages" that interface with users. The core idea is that while Hyperliquid provides the foundational liquidity and matching engine (like an exchange), these upper-layer applications handle user acquisition, product design, and experience optimization (like brokerages such as Robinhood). Their primary revenue models include transaction fee sharing and the potential appreciation of the HYPE token required for deployment. Key projects highlighted include: * **Trade.xyz**: Dominates the HIP-3 space by bringing traditional finance assets (indices, commodities, stocks) onto Hyperliquid. * **Dreamcash**: Focuses on mobile user growth with a simplified, gamified interface to lower the barrier to entry. * **Ventuals**: Targets the Pre-IPO market, creating perpetual contracts for unicorn company valuations. * **Based**: Aims to be a "super app" combining trading, prediction markets, and crypto payments, introducing yield-generating collateral via its HyENA protocol. * **Minara AI**: Explores an AI Agent future, allowing users to execute trades on Hyperliquid via natural language commands to AI tools. The article concludes that this open, composable ecosystem is Hyperliquid's key competitive advantage. It is evolving from a user-facing platform into a financial operating system (Financial OS). This creates a symbiotic network where each new application brings more users and liquidity to Hyperliquid, while the applications benefit from its robust infrastructure. This network effect could define the next phase of competition among decentralized financial networks.

Odaily星球日报13 мин. назад

If Hyperliquid Is the New Nasdaq, Which Projects Are Playing the Role of Brokers?

Odaily星球日报13 мин. назад

Different Choices After the Plunge: Institutions Buy the Dip, Traders Shift to US Stocks

Title: Diverging Strategies After the Crash: Institutions Buying the Dip, Traders Shifting to US Stocks Following a sharp decline where Bitcoin briefly fell below $60,000 on June 6th, market sentiment remains "extreme fear" despite a partial recovery. This has led to varied responses from major market participants. Several institutional figures and analysts present a cautiously optimistic long-term view for Bitcoin. Glassnode's co-founder identifies $46k-$54k as a probable key bottom range based on historical on-chain models, while a Standard Chartered executive suggests the bottom is nearly formed. Strive's CEO points to Bitcoin touching its 200-week moving average as a historically reliable buy signal. Analysts highlight metrics like MVRV ratio and the "Power Law" model indicating Bitcoin is in an extremely undervalued zone. Conversely, some traders are exiting the crypto space. One trader cited a more attractive risk/reward profile and deeper research opportunities in US stocks, particularly with AI-related equities outperforming and capital rotating away from crypto. This shift is partly attributed to perceived ongoing risks, including those related to Strategy's Bitcoin sales. Market prediction data suggests a high probability (72%) of Bitcoin falling below $55,000, but lower odds for a deeper crash below $35k-$40k. The overall picture is one of division: institutions and long-term analysts see a accumulating opportunity, while some active traders are seeking alpha elsewhere amidst the volatility and shifting capital flows.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Different Choices After the Plunge: Institutions Buy the Dip, Traders Shift to US Stocks

marsbit1 ч. назад

Tech Stocks in the Midst of Deleveraging: Rather Than Rushing to Buy the Dip, Wait for the Macro Environment to Stabilize First

"Technology Stocks in Deleveraging Phase: Wait for Macro Stability Before Buying the Dip" The current sell-off in tech/AI stocks is primarily driven by macro headwinds, not a breakdown in AI fundamentals. After a parabolic rise, the market faced a perfect storm: an overcrowded trade, a massive SpaceX IPO draining liquidity, pre-CPI/PPI/FOMC hedging, and strong jobs data renewing "higher-for-longer" rate fears. This triggered a concentrated deleveraging in hot tech names. Key historical context: Unlike the December 2023 sell-off focused on AI capex returns, the current correction centers on the "denominator" – rising concerns over rates, inflation, the Fed, geopolitics, and liquidity. Leading memory stocks like Micron have seen ~20% pullbacks, significant but not yet at panic levels seen in March. The intense selling wave may be largely over, but a quick V-shaped recovery is unlikely. The market will likely churn in high volatility, awaiting clarity. The immediate catalyst needed for a sustainable reversal is a "stop-bleeding" signal from macro conditions. This doesn't require a major positive shock (like the April Iran ceasefire), but simply a halt to further deterioration: CPI not surprising hotter, Treasury yields stabilizing, the Fed not turning more hawkish, and post-SpaceX IPO liquidity easing. Once macro pressure plateaus, the intact AI investment thesis – centered on persistent compute/memory shortages and accelerating commercialization – can quickly regain market focus. The strategy is clear: prioritize monitoring macro stabilization over rushing to bottom-fish individual AI stories. Patience is key.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Tech Stocks in the Midst of Deleveraging: Rather Than Rushing to Buy the Dip, Wait for the Macro Environment to Stabilize First

marsbit1 ч. назад

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

South Korean stocks experienced their sharpest decline of the year, with the KOSPI index plunging nearly 9% on Monday, triggering a market circuit breaker. Leading semiconductor firms Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix were heavily sold off, raising questions about whether the AI-driven bull market has reached an inflection point. This sell-off was largely triggered by a significant drop in the U.S. semiconductor sector late last week. Concurrently, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang visited Seoul over the weekend, meeting with top executives from SK Group, Samsung, LG, and NAVER. He announced a new multi-year partnership with SK Hynix to co-develop next-generation memory products for AI data centers. Huang emphasized that AI infrastructure build-out remains in its early stages, creating a stark contrast between market panic and ongoing, strengthened industry collaboration. The article argues that South Korea has become one of the most sensitive markets for global AI-related capital flows, functioning like a large AI memory ETF due to the heavy weighting of its chipmakers. The current market turmoil reflects a shift in investor focus: from simply betting on overall AI growth to scrutinizing which companies will actually capture the profits from that growth. This "profit pool reassessment" phase is causing high volatility based on supply chain news and earnings guidance. Ultimately, the direction of the Korean market will be determined by external factors—NVIDIA's orders, HBM supply-demand dynamics, and capital expenditures from cloud service providers—rather than domestic conditions. The disconnect between sharp price corrections and continued strong signals from the industry core leaves the market at a crossroads, awaiting clearer data on the durability of AI infrastructure demand.

marsbit1 ч. назад

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片