Indepth Research

Provide in-depth research reports and independent analysis, leveraging data, technology, and economic insights to deliver a comprehensive examination of the blockchain ecosystem, project potential, and market trends.

While Everyone Is Selling Software Stocks, HSBC Says You're Wrong

Amid a severe selloff in software stocks dubbed the "SaaSpocalypse" in early 2026, HSBC’s U.S. tech research head Stephen Bersey published a contrarian report titled "Software Will Eat AI." He argues that the market’s fear—that AI agents will replace traditional enterprise software—is a misjudgment. Instead, Bersey contends that AI will be absorbed into existing software platforms, becoming an embedded capability rather than a disruptor. Key points from the report include: - AI lacks the depth to replace complex enterprise systems due to training data limitations and inability to replicate decades of proprietary business logic. - "Vibe coding" and AI-native approaches overestimate the ability to rebuild reliable, large-scale enterprise software from scratch. - High switching costs and trust in incumbent software providers create durable barriers. Bersey believes software companies with deep data moats and AI integration capabilities—such as Oracle, Microsoft, Salesforce, and ServiceNow—are well-positioned to monetize AI through task-based agents operating within software-defined boundaries. He sees 2026 as the year AI monetization scales within software, driven by inference demand, not training. HSBC recommends buying select software stocks while downgrading others like IBM and Palo Alto Networks, emphasizing that not all will benefit equally. The core thesis: software is the vehicle through which AI delivers scalable, governed enterprise value—not its replacement.

marsbit02/25 02:51

While Everyone Is Selling Software Stocks, HSBC Says You're Wrong

marsbit02/25 02:51

More Accurate Than Polls, More Dangerous Than Imagined: Prediction Markets in the Eyes of the Fed

The Federal Reserve is exploring the use of prediction markets, particularly Kalshi, as a real-time tool for policy insights. A Fed-affiliated working paper found that Kalshi’s predictions for core CPI and unemployment are statistically comparable to—and sometimes more accurate than—Bloomberg consensus estimates. Prediction markets aggregate real-money, belief-backed trading, offering frequent updates and capturing nuanced shifts that traditional surveys miss. For instance, Kalshi priced inflation uncertainty in real time during a trade policy scare—a dynamic monthly surveys couldn’t reflect. While these markets provide valuable signals, they also carry risks. Prices reflect both expectations and risk preferences, and heavy reliance on sports betting for liquidity makes macroeconomic markets vulnerable to regulatory changes. If sports betting is restricted, liquidity could dry up, increasing manipulation risks. Moreover, if the Fed openly uses prediction markets, it could create a feedback loop where traders manipulate smaller markets like Kalshi to influence broader policy communication and traditional financial instruments. Despite these concerns, prediction markets offer a uniquely timely and distributed form of expectation aggregation—especially for events like FOMC meetings, where informed participants trade with real stakes. The Fed should require open data transparency to mitigate manipulation and carefully weigh the signal against the noise.

比推02/24 18:33

More Accurate Than Polls, More Dangerous Than Imagined: Prediction Markets in the Eyes of the Fed

比推02/24 18:33

活动图片