Indepth Research

Provide in-depth research reports and independent analysis, leveraging data, technology, and economic insights to deliver a comprehensive examination of the blockchain ecosystem, project potential, and market trends.

Cyber Chumaxian: Fake Taoists, AI Fortune-Telling, and the Forgotten Mysticism of Northeast China

"Cyber Shamans: Fake Taoists, AI Fortune-Telling, and the Untold Story of Northeast China’s Occultism" For millennia, the Chinese have developed complex metaphysical systems—from oracle bone divination to the I Ching and Four Pillars of Destiny—to seek security in an uncertain world. Despite modern technology’s attempt to replace superstition with rationality, AI has ironically become occultism’s latest tool. Recent crackdowns exposed fake Taoists using AI to answer existential queries, while apps like CeCe attract millions with free AI fortune-telling, later charging for live “spiritual” consultations. At the heart of this fusion is Northeast China, where Shamanic and “Chumaxian” traditions (based on animal spirits possessing humans) have evolved into a robust industry. Historically rooted in hardship—from the migration waves of “Chuang Guandong” to post-industrial unemployment—Northeastern metaphysics thrives on uncertainty. Today, it offers what many call “therapy tailored for the Chinese soul”: externalizing blame through cosmic narratives (e.g., bad luck years or evil spirits), unlike Western psychology’s inward focus. AI accelerates this shift. With algorithms now matching expert diviners in accuracy, low-end fortune tellers are being replaced. Meanwhile, prompt-savvy “metaphysical engineers” use AI to generate readings, focusing only on emotional delivery. Live-streamed “cyber shamans” combine folksy warmth with AI-generated scripts, offering cheap comfort in anxious times. This trend has even gone global. Startups like FateTell sell AI-translated Chinese astrology reports to overseas users, repackaging “feudal superstition” as Eastern philosophy for Silicon Valley elites. Yet behind the rise of AI mysticism lies a deeper human yearning—for certainty in an unstable world. As regulations tighten on AI divination, the core demand remains: whether through shamans or algorithms, people still seek comfort when facing the unknown.

marsbit03/30 02:08

Cyber Chumaxian: Fake Taoists, AI Fortune-Telling, and the Forgotten Mysticism of Northeast China

marsbit03/30 02:08

Weekly Editor's Picks (0321-0327)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0321-0327) by Odaily Planet Daily features in-depth analyses from the past week. Key topics include: **Macro & Geopolitics:** The article analyzes why oil prices remain above $100/barrel despite a 400-million-barrel strategic reserve release, citing Iran-related supply disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. It discusses the economic impact of the Iran conflict, parallels with Ukraine, and how bond market volatility—not just oil—is reshaping monetary policy expectations. **Investment & Startups:** Balancer proposes major tokenomics reforms and operational restructuring after a $120M exploit, shifting from token emission-driven growth to a revenue-focused model. **Web3 & AI:** ERC-8183 is highlighted as a key protocol for decentralized AI agent economies, structuring task-based commerce on-chain. Another piece argues that AI agents won’t kill SaaS; instead, proprietary data and entrenched workflows will remain crucial moats. **Prediction Markets:** Polymarket’s liquidity incentives and fee structure are examined, noting that only 2% of users generate 90% of volume. Profitable strategies include sports betting, crypto market-making, and high-conviction trading. **Policy & Stablecoins:** The proposed U.S. CLARITY Act may redefine stablecoins as payment tools (not savings products), potentially negatively impacting DeFi tokens like UNI while benefiting compliant entities like Circle. Also included are airdrop guides, Ethereum L2 developments, and weekly highlights like Tether’s audit progress and regulatory updates.

marsbit03/28 03:07

Weekly Editor's Picks (0321-0327)

marsbit03/28 03:07

2% of Users Contribute 90% of Trading Volume: The True Portrait of Polymarket

A deep analysis of Polymarket's user base reveals a stark concentration of trading activity: just 2% of users, classified as high-frequency, high-volume professional traders (P6), generate nearly 90% of the platform's total trading volume. This contrasts with the 69% of users who are low-activity, small-scale participants (P2), driven primarily by major events like elections or sports. The study, analyzing three months of on-chain data, segments users into seven profiles based on transaction frequency (T1-T7) and volume (V1-V7). While the user base is dominated by infrequent, small-scale bettors, the trading volume is overwhelmingly controlled by a small cohort of algorithmic and systematic traders. This structural split directly influences market dynamics. Cryptocurrency markets are dominated by P6 traders, indicating heavy algorithmic activity. Sports markets attract a more diverse mix, including seasoned human bettors. Political markets have the highest share of users but are filled with event-driven, one-time participants. The findings have critical implications for fee structures. Polymarket's current tiered fees—highest for crypto (1.80%), lower for sports (0.75%) and politics (1.00%), and zero for geopolitics—are strategically aligned with the tolerance of each user profile. A flat fee could severely damage liquidity by discouraging the vital P6 segment. The report concludes that platform growth strategies must be tailored to target specific user profiles: P6 for volume, P2 for user growth. It posits that Polymarket's future may lie at the intersection of crypto and AI, potentially becoming a mass-market platform for autonomous trading agents.

marsbit03/27 10:07

2% of Users Contribute 90% of Trading Volume: The True Portrait of Polymarket

marsbit03/27 10:07

活动图片