Boycott Urged For CLARITY Act Draft: Expert Raises Concerns Over Banks Manipulation

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-01-15Обновлено 2026-01-15

Введение

The CLARITY Act draft faces strong opposition from crypto advocates who argue that banking lobbyists have manipulated the bill to undermine the industry. A key point of contention is a ban on stablecoin issuers, like Circle and Ripple, from offering yield payments to passive token holders. Market expert Nick Cash urges a boycott, warning this gives traditional institutions a competitive advantage and threatens DeFi innovation. Banking groups claim such yields risk financial stability by potentially drawing deposits away from insured banks. However, crypto advocates, including the Blockchain Association's Summer Mersinger, counter that this is anti-competitive and stifles consumer choice. Data indicates strong public support (nearly 4-to-1) for allowing stablecoin rewards, with little desire for government restrictions. The act's future remains uncertain as debates over banking oversight in crypto continue.

As the anticipated markup of the CLARITY Act approaches, supporters of the digital asset market are raising alarms over the latest draft of the bill. They claim that the revisions pushed by banking lobbyists threaten to undermine the principles of the cryptocurrency industry.

Ban On Yield Payments In CLARITY Act

In a recent post on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), market expert Nick Cash vocalized his strong opposition, stating that the current iteration of the CLARITY Act must be boycotted.

He described it as a mechanism for banks to manipulate the future of cryptocurrencies, portraying their influence as a detrimental force for innovation in the sector.

The revised version of the CLARITY Act, which serves as a comprehensive crypto market structure bill, introduces significant restrictions on stablecoin issuers like Circle and Ripple. Notably, these firms will be prohibited from offering yield back to passive token holders.

Title IV of the Digital Asset Market Consumer Protection Act (DAMCA) outlines how regulated banking institutions can interact with digital assets, mandating that stablecoin issuers—defined by the GENIUS Act—cannot make interest payments to holders.

Under the proposed changes, while stablecoin issuers would still be able to provide rewards tied to specific actions (such as account openings and cashback), the ban on yield payments poses a serious concern for the crypto industry, which has consistently viewed yield protection as a non-negotiable issue.

Cash argues that the modifications may leave crypto-native issuers positioned at a competitive disadvantage against traditional banks. He warned that such restrictions could severely impact decentralized finance (DeFi) and the overall cryptocurrency landscape.

Expressing his frustration, Cash stated that those supporting the revised bill are essentially siding with banks and undermining the crypto movement.

Strong Public Support For Stablecoin Rewards

Banking institutions have argued that allowing these interest payments could lead to a significant outflow of deposits from insured banks, threatening overall financial stability.

In contrast, crypto advocates counter that blocking crypto exchanges from paying interest on stablecoins is anti-competitive and detrimental to innovation. Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association, articulated her stance, asserting:

What is threatening progress is not a lack of policymaker engagement, but the relentless pressure campaign by the Big Banks to rewrite this bill to protect their own incumbency.

She highlighted that the demand to eliminate stablecoin rewards aims to restrict consumer choice and stifle innovative financial products before they have the chance to compete.

Amid this ongoing CLARITY Act debate, Stuart Alderoty, Chief Legal Officer at Ripple, weighed in, emphasizing that American consumers value their freedom to choose.

He referenced new data from The National Cryptocurrency Association, which indicates a strong public preference—nearly 4-to-1—in favor of allowing stablecoin rewards, along with little appetite for government intervention to curb them.

Ultimately, the future of the CLARITY Act remains uncertain as stakeholders continue to voice their concerns about the implications of increased banking oversight on the cryptocurrency market.

The daily chart shows the surge in the total crypto market cap above $3.2 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main concern raised by market expert Nick Cash regarding the revised CLARITY Act draft?

ANick Cash argues that the revised CLARITY Act is a mechanism for banks to manipulate the future of cryptocurrencies, which undermines innovation and places crypto-native issuers at a competitive disadvantage against traditional banks.

QWhat specific restriction on stablecoin issuers is introduced in the revised bill's Title IV of DAMCA?

ATitle IV of the Digital Asset Market Consumer Protection Act (DAMCA) mandates that stablecoin issuers, as defined by the GENIUS Act, are prohibited from making interest payments (yield) to passive token holders.

QAccording to banking institutions, why should stablecoin issuers be banned from offering yield payments?

ABanking institutions argue that allowing interest payments on stablecoins could lead to a significant outflow of deposits from insured banks, threatening overall financial stability.

QWhat does the new survey data from The National Cryptocurrency Association reveal about public opinion on stablecoin rewards?

AThe survey indicates strong public support, with nearly a 4-to-1 ratio in favor of allowing stablecoin rewards, and little appetite for government intervention to curb them.

QHow does Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association, characterize the banks' efforts to rewrite the CLARITY Act?

ASummer Mersinger describes it as a 'relentless pressure campaign by the Big Banks to rewrite this bill to protect their own incumbency,' which she believes stifles innovation and restricts consumer choice.

Похожее

Weekly Token Unlocks: SUI Unlocks $42 Million Worth of Tokens

This week's major token unlocks feature SUI, EigenLayer, and Jupiter, with a total value exceeding $42 million. SUI leads with an unlock valued at approximately $42 million. EigenLayer, a protocol introducing restaking on Ethereum, will unlock 36.85 million tokens worth roughly $6.67 million. It allows users to restake their ETH to extend economic security to other applications. Jupiter, a leading DEX aggregator on Solana, will unlock 53.35 million tokens valued at about $9.23 million. The platform offers various products including DCA, limit orders, and perpetual trading. Release schedules for the token unlocks are provided.

marsbit31 мин. назад

Weekly Token Unlocks: SUI Unlocks $42 Million Worth of Tokens

marsbit31 мин. назад

When Is The Next FOMC Meeting And What Are The Expectations For Crypto?

The next FOMC meeting is scheduled for April 29, 2026, and is expected to result in no change to the current interest rate of 3.5-3.75%. According to the FedWatch Tool, there is a 99.5% probability rates will remain unchanged, a 0.5% chance of a hike, and a 0% chance of a cut. Consequently, the crypto market is anticipated to see little to no significant movement following the announcement. Historically, FOMC decisions heavily influence crypto: hawkish stances (rate hikes) often cause market declines, while dovish stances (rate cuts) typically trigger rallies. A neutral decision, like the one expected, usually allows the market to continue its existing trend without major disruption.

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

When Is The Next FOMC Meeting And What Are The Expectations For Crypto?

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Global Wealth Report: US Produces 36 New Millionaires Daily, India Emerges as Fastest-Growing Dark Horse

Knight Frank's "The Wealth Report 2026" highlights the rapid expansion of global private wealth. Between 2021 and 2026, the number of ultra-high-net-worth individuals (UHNWIs), those with over $30 million, increased by 162,191 to 713,626—averaging 89 new millionaires daily. The United States led this growth, contributing 41% of all new UHNWIs and increasing its global share from 33% to 35%. China remains the second-largest wealth hub, though its share declined from 18% to 17%. India emerged as a standout, with a 63% surge in UHNWIs. Regionally, North America dominates with 37% of UHNWIs, followed by Asia-Pacific (31%) and Europe (25%). The Middle East also saw significant growth. Future growth is expected from rapidly maturing economies like Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and Poland.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Global Wealth Report: US Produces 36 New Millionaires Daily, India Emerges as Fastest-Growing Dark Horse

marsbit1 ч. назад

AI Giants Enter the Dark Forest

In the AI industry's "dark forest," major players like Anthropic, OpenAI, and DeepSeek are strategically withholding their most advanced models to avoid becoming targets in a high-stakes competitive landscape. Anthropic released Claude Opus 4.7 but admitted it underperforms compared to their unreleased model Mythos, citing safety concerns. They delayed addressing user complaints about performance regression until OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 launch, highlighting a tactic of controlled disclosure aligned with competitors’ moves. OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, though a full retrain since GPT-4.5, was seen as incremental rather than revolutionary. Leaks revealed internal models like Glacier and Heisenberg, indicating significant unreleased capabilities. OpenAI acknowledges a "capability overhang," where real model power exceeds what users experience, often due to infrastructure-driven throttling. DeepSeek launched V4 Preview, a cost-efficient model, but its full potential (V4 Pro Max) awaits Huawei’s Ascend 950 super-nodes量产 in late 2026. Their strategy focuses on affordability and scalability, aiming to democratize AI access globally, a move noted even by NVIDIA’s CEO as a disruptive threat. Together, these actions reflect a broader trend: leading AI labs are deliberately pacing releases, hiding strengths, and aligning disclosures with competitive dynamics—each avoiding the risk of exposure in a forest where first movers become targets.

marsbit1 ч. назад

AI Giants Enter the Dark Forest

marsbit1 ч. назад

Naval Steps Into the Arena: A Historic Collision Between Ordinary People and Venture Capital

Naval Ravikant, co-founder of AngelList and a prominent Silicon Valley thinker, has taken a hands-on role as the chairman of the investment committee at USVC—a new SEC-registered fund allowing non-accredited investors to access high-growth private tech companies with a minimum investment of $500. The fund’s initial portfolio includes leading AI firms like OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, and others. This move represents a significant shift in democratizing access to venture capital, a space traditionally dominated by institutional investors and high-net-worth individuals. USVC aims to let ordinary investors participate in the high-alpha, pre-IPO growth phase of tech companies—a stage where much of the value creation now occurs before public listings. However, the fund is not without complexities. It offers limited liquidity, with potential quarterly redemptions capped at 5%, and charges an all-in fee of 2.5% in its first year. While this is higher than traditional ETFs, it is positioned as a more accessible alternative to conventional VC fee structures. Ultimately, USVC symbolizes a broader movement toward financial inclusion in high-stakes tech investing—not through crypto or Web3 mechanisms, but via regulated, retail-friendly investment vehicles. It offers a ticket to early-stage innovation, though risks typical of venture capital remain.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Naval Steps Into the Arena: A Historic Collision Between Ordinary People and Venture Capital

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow