Behind NEAR's Doubling: Three Major Trends Fueling Its Price Surge

链捕手Опубликовано 2026-05-26Обновлено 2026-05-26

Введение

NEAR's price has recently doubled, driven by three key catalysts. First, its strong AI narrative: co-founder Illia Polosukhin co-authored the foundational Transformer paper, and NEAR has integrated AI into its super-app, positioning it as decentralized AI infrastructure. Second, it has evolved into a privacy-focused chain, launching features like Confidential Payments to enable private cross-chain transfers, balancing privacy with usability for institutional and DeFi users. Third, its tokenomics are bolstered by a buyback mechanism: with full circulation achieved and inflation halved, fees from the NEAR Intents layer are used to repurchase NEAR tokens, reducing sell pressure. Combined with a recovering TVL exceeding $80 million, these factors are fueling NEAR's current market outperformance.

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

On May 25, the price of NEAR, the native token of the NEAR protocol, stands at $2.37. Since early May, NEAR has surged from a low of $1.24 to a high of $2.5, with its market capitalization returning above $3 billion. While mainstream crypto assets like Bitcoin have been fluctuating, NEAR has charted its own independent upward trajectory, emerging as one of the brightest performing tokens alongside others like ZEC, ONDO, and HYPE. What are the underlying reasons for this breakout?

The AI Narrative

NEAR co-founder Illia Polosukhin is a seasoned professional in the AI field. Illia is one of the eight co-authors of the seminal Transformer paper, alongside others like Ashish Vaswani and Noam Shazeer from Google Brain / Google Research. This paper introduced the Transformer architecture, which relies entirely on attention mechanisms, significantly improving parallel training efficiency and model scale. It is the foundational framework for all major contemporary large models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

NEAR has made AI a core strategy from its early days. In February of this year, NEAR officially launched the Near.com super-app, integrating cross-chain swaps, privacy tools, and smart contract management into one platform with built-in AI capabilities, supporting autonomous agent application scenarios. In November 2023, Illia also formally assumed the role of NEAR Foundation CEO, focusing the strategy primarily around the AI narrative.

In May, Nvidia's earnings report spurred a broader recovery in the AI sector, with NEAR being viewed as a representative of decentralized AI infrastructure, alongside tokens like TAO.

On May 22, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes, in an article, grouped NEAR with HYPE and ZEC in a call for attention, directly igniting market sentiment.

Privacy-Focused Blockchain

Blockchain has long faced the privacy dilemma where 'transparency equals publicity.' The sharp rise of privacy coins like ZEC and XMR has refocused the industry's attention on the privacy sector, leading various protocols, including public blockchains, to start incorporating privacy features.

NEAR was founded in 2018. Its initial core positioning was not AI, but scalability. Its earliest progress primarily revolved around continuously optimizing sharding technology, making it one of the hot 'Ethereum killer' public blockchains at the time.

Because of this, NEAR's public sale on CoinList once crashed the latter's website. During the 2020-2021 bull cycle, NEAR soared from $0.5 to a peak of $20.59, becoming one of the most watched star tokens that year.

However, fast-forwarding to this cycle, the vast majority of older tokens and new VC-backed tokens have been shunned by the market. Therefore, even in this bull cycle, NEAR only reached a high of around $9 in 2024 before declining steadily, hitting a low of $0.84 in 2026.

With the official launch of NEAR Intents, privacy requirements have become critically important. Intents are core to cross-chain transactions, allowing users to execute actions simply by expressing intent. However, large on-chain transactions are vulnerable to MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) attacks when public, a significant drawback for institutions, large holders, and ordinary DeFi users alike.

The NEAR team began planning privacy as a crucial complement to Intents. In late May this year, the NEAR Intents team launched Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents features, supporting private cross-chain transfers for assets like ETH, BTC, SOL, and USDC across 35+ chains. The sender, amount, and path are all hidden, with only the result visible on the target chain, utilizing a private shard + TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) bridge at the underlying layer.

NEAR also opened a privacy mode, where user balances, transfers, and transaction activities are private by default. Whether for ordinary users, enterprise users, or AI agents executing complex strategies, this prevents data leakage. The Confidential Treasuries (Trezu) launched around the same time further supports private multi-signature wallets, payroll, and cross-chain payments, having already processed $68 million in confidential transactions.

Compared to pure privacy coins like Zcash, NEAR's balance between privacy, usability, and cross-chain functionality is more practical, directly addressing enterprise-level demand and driving a recovery in TVL and developer activity.

NEAR Intents Fee Buyback

In October 2025, NEAR completed the unlocking of its final batch of initial supply, bringing its circulating supply close to 100%.

NEAR designed a dual mechanism of inflation + burning from its mainnet's early days: a maximum annual inflation of 5% (permanently halved to 2.5% via an upgrade in October 2025), with 90% going to validators as rewards and 10% entering the protocol treasury. Entering 2026, the project has no major unlock events or linear unlocks remaining, only the regular epoch reward emissions (approximately 5.4 million NEAR released in the last 30 days, about 0.4% of total supply).

In addition, the fee revenue generated by NEAR Intents is used to directly buy back NEAR tokens on the market, also creating significant buying pressure.

NEAR's intent-driven cross-chain transaction layer on the protocol allows users to simply express their desired outcome (e.g., swapping BTC for SOL), and it provides the optimal execution path, supporting multiple chains without the need for bridging/wrapped assets and featuring low fees.

NEAR Intents previously had two fee components: protocol fees and distribution fees (shared with third-party integrators). However, protocol fees now entirely go into the buyback path. The repurchased NEAR isn't necessarily burned immediately; instead, after being bought back, it is staked, locked, or removed from liquidity. It still counts towards the total supply but reduces circulating supply pressure while also earning staking rewards.

According to the latest data from defiLlama, the TVL of NEAR Intents has exceeded $80 million, with its daily generated fees fluctuating around $100,000, translating to a monthly buyback amount of approximately $3 million.

At the end of this month, its core development team, Near One, also announced the latest technical progress. The team plans to release dynamic resharding by the end of Q2 2026 to significantly enhance scalability. Additionally, the team will introduce NEAR's post-quantum secure signature scheme and perform upgrades in June this year, improving its resistance to quantum computing.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat are the three main catalysts driving NEAR's recent price surge according to the article?

AThe three main catalysts are: 1) AI Narrative, due to co-founder Illia Polosukhin's AI background and NEAR's strategic focus. 2) Privacy Public Chain, through features like Confidential Payments and Intents. 3) NEAR Intents fee buybacks, which reduce circulating supply.

QWho is Illia Polosukhin and what is his significance in the AI field?

AIllia Polosukhin is a co-founder of NEAR. He is one of the eight co-authors of the seminal Transformer paper, which introduced the Transformer architecture that forms the foundation of modern large language models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

QWhat specific privacy features did NEAR Intents launch in May, and what problem do they solve?

AIn May, NEAR Intents launched Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents features. They solve the privacy problem for cross-chain transfers by hiding the sender, amount, and transaction path across 35+ chains, protecting users from MEV attacks and data leaks during large or complex transactions.

QHow does the NEAR Intents fee buyback mechanism work and what is its impact?

AFees generated by the NEAR Intents protocol are used to buy back NEAR tokens from the market. These bought-back tokens are then staked, locked, or removed from liquidity. This reduces selling pressure on the circulating supply and creates consistent buy-side demand, with current monthly buybacks estimated around $3 million.

QWhat are the key upcoming technical upgrades mentioned for NEAR in the article?

AThe key upcoming upgrades are: 1) Dynamic Resharding, to be released at the end of Q2 2026, which will significantly improve scalability. 2) A post-quantum secure signature scheme, planned for introduction and upgrade in June of this year, to enhance its resistance to quantum computing attacks.

Похожее

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's recent statement that "intelligence will become a utility like electricity or water" has sparked significant controversy, primarily around copyright issues and the nature of AI development. While positioning AI as a utility serves as a compelling narrative for infrastructure investors, critics argue the analogy is flawed in three key areas. First, there's a fundamental "property gap." Traditional utilities like water and power create new, physical infrastructure from scratch. In contrast, major AI models are trained by reorganizing vast amounts of existing human-created content—books, articles, code, etc.—often scraped from the web without explicit permission or compensation to creators. This "free acquisition, paid resale" model is seen by many as ethically problematic. Second, there's a "pricing gap." True public utilities are typically regulated to ensure universal service with non-discriminatory, cost-plus pricing. AI's token-based pricing, however, involves significant price discrimination (e.g., output tokens costing much more than input tokens) and is designed for revenue maximization, not equitable access. Third, a "governance gap" exists. Utilities operate under public oversight, while AI pricing and development are currently controlled by a few private companies. Furthermore, the industry's own shift toward buying licensed training data (e.g., deals with Reddit or news publishers) undermines its previous legal reliance on "fair use" for freely scraped data. In conclusion, while AI is indeed becoming a foundational technology, calling it a public utility remains contentious. The title requires not just scale and a pay-per-use model, but also credible solutions for data provenance, equitable pricing, and public governance.

marsbit8 мин. назад

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

marsbit8 мин. назад

From ZEC's Surge to Vitalik's Support: Will the Privacy Narrative Resurface?

From ZEC's surge to Vitalik's endorsement, is privacy making a comeback? The recent rally in ZEC has refocused attention on the crypto privacy sector. This resurgence stems from a growing market realization: while blockchain transparency builds trust, full exposure of user balances, trading strategies, and risk positions can become a vulnerability, especially for large traders and institutions on platforms like Hyperliquid. The privacy landscape has evolved beyond classic anonymity coins like ZEC, XMR, and DASH. It now encompasses privacy infrastructure projects such as Railgun (bringing privacy to DeFi) and Aztec (a privacy-focused L2), as well as newer entrants like Genius Terminal, SilentSwap, and 0xBow that emphasize transaction privacy while attempting to balance compliance. Industry trends confirm privacy is becoming integrated, not a niche feature. Perp DEX Aster has introduced a "Shield Mode," and Vitalik has discussed the need for native privacy at the Ethereum protocol level, including proposals like EIP-8182 for standardized private transfers. In conclusion, this revival is more than a simple sector rotation. It reflects a critical reassessment of transparency's limits. As on-chain finance matures, the challenge is finding a sustainable balance between necessary transparency for trust and essential privacy for protecting assets and strategies, making privacy a potential cornerstone of next-generation infrastructure.

marsbit18 мин. назад

From ZEC's Surge to Vitalik's Support: Will the Privacy Narrative Resurface?

marsbit18 мин. назад

Trump, the "Stock Market Manipulator" in U.S. Stocks, Lifts Up the Entire Quantum Computing Sector

"Trump, the 'U.S. Stock Market Mastermind,' Boosts the Entire Quantum Computing Sector" This article details how former U.S. President Donald Trump's policies and public statements have significantly influenced the stock market, particularly in the quantum computing sector. A key example is the U.S. government's direct investment in Intel stock in August 2025, which yielded over $45 billion in gains within seven months. Trump publicly credited himself for this profit. Recently, the Trump administration announced a new $2 billion initiative. Through the Department of Commerce, funding from the CHIPS and Science Act will be provided to nine quantum computing companies in exchange for minority, non-controlling equity stakes. The recipients include IBM ($1B for its subsidiary Anderon), GlobalFoundries ($375M), and listed companies like D-Wave, Infleqtion, and Rigetti ($100M each). Private firms such as Atom Computing and PsiQuantum also received $100M. This "investment-for-equity" strategy marks a shift from pure subsidies to an "active investor" model under the CHIPS Act. The announcement immediately boosted quantum computing stocks. The article frames this as part of Trump's "America First" industrial policy, aimed at securing U.S. technological leadership, similar to past investments in semiconductors, rare earths, and lithium. The author suggests this pattern of government-backed market intervention, alongside Trump's personal stock endorsements, is a hallmark of his approach to driving market gains and may continue in sectors like defense and advanced energy.

marsbit57 мин. назад

Trump, the "Stock Market Manipulator" in U.S. Stocks, Lifts Up the Entire Quantum Computing Sector

marsbit57 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片