Base Shifts From OP Stack to Unified Stack for Next Phase of Upgrades

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-19Обновлено 2026-02-19

Введение

Base, a Coinbase-incubated Ethereum layer-2 blockchain, is transitioning from the OP Stack to its own unified software stack called "base/base" to accelerate upgrades and enhance security. While moving away from the OP Stack, Base will continue to receive support from the Optimism Foundation and remain compatible with OP Stack specifications. The new stack, built on open-source components like Reth, simplifies the architecture, making the network easier to update while maintaining safety and decentralization. Base remains a Stage 1 decentralized rollup and is strengthening security with an independent signer, faster withdrawals, improved governance, and stronger protections. The roadmap includes multiple hard forks: Base V1 will implement Ethereum’s Fusaka upgrades and transition to TEE/ZK proofs, while future forks (V2 and V3) aim to improve user interactions and add Ethereum’s Glamsterdam support. Node operators are advised to switch to the new base client for compatibility with upcoming upgrades.

Base, a Coinbase-incubated Ethereum layer-2 blockchain, was launched as an OP Stack chain, then incorporated a diverse range of software in collaboration with various partners, including Optimism, Flashbots, and Paradigm.

According to the Base announcement, they introduced a single unified stack called base/base for accelerating upgrades and additional security, and it is made public and opened for contribution. While moving away from the OP Stack, it will still receive mission-critical support from the Optimism Foundation.

Simplifying the Stack to Accelerate Upgrades

According to the Base engineering blog, “Our unified solution, base/base, built on open-sourced components such as Reth, allows us to dramatically simplify the number of components, by optimizing them directly for our use case.” This will make the network easier to update and allow the developers to focus on what Base specifically needs, as it is open and public.

As Base is upgrading how it works to become more independent and efficient. Importantly, nothing changes in terms of safety. Base remains a Stage 1 decentralized rollup, and the team is also strengthening security by adding an independent signer and speeding up plans for faster withdrawals, improved governance, and stronger protections to keep the network open, neutral, and secure for everyone.

Base’s Long-Term Roadmap

As of now, Base blog noted, “Base will continue operating as it does today, and we will remain compatible with the OP Stack specification.”

The upcoming hard fork (Base V1) is going to implement Ethereum’s Fusaka upgrades and transition from Optimistic proofs to TEE/ZK proofs for a faster network. Further, two more hard forks are discussed, such as the Base V2 hard fork, which is planned to introduce smoother user interactions. Then, Base V3 hard fork is planned to add Ethereum’s Glamsterdam Support.

As the shift marks a broader architectural consolidation across Base’s evolution, from its initial OP Stack foundations to a unified stack fully maintained within Base, the Base network asks node operators to use the new base for client updates instead of Optimism’s to remain compatible with upcoming future hard forks.

Highlighted Crypto News:

CoinFello Unveils AI Smart Contract Agent at ETHDenver with BuffiBot Preview

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main change Base is making to its technological stack according to the article?

ABase is shifting from the OP Stack to a new, unified stack called base/base to accelerate upgrades and enhance security.

QDespite moving away from the OP Stack, what ongoing support will Base receive?

ABase will still receive mission-critical support from the Optimism Foundation.

QWhat is the primary goal of Base's new unified stack, base/base?

AThe goal is to dramatically simplify the number of components, making the network easier to update and allowing developers to focus on Base's specific needs.

QWhat key security feature is the team adding as part of its upgrades?

AThe team is strengthening security by adding an independent signer.

QWhat is the planned change for the Base V1 hard fork regarding proofs?

AThe Base V1 hard fork will transition from Optimistic proofs to TEE/ZK proofs for a faster network.

Похожее

La Liga Team Bets $1 Million Against Themselves Before Match: Does Using Prediction Markets for Insurance Comply with Sports Regulations?

A Spanish La Liga club, reportedly Osasuna, purchased insurance against relegation and was linked to a transaction of over $1 million on the prediction market platform Kalshi, betting against its own victory in a crucial season-ending match. While Osasuna confirmed buying €1.2 million insurance for a potential €6 million payout in case of relegation through broker Howden, it did not confirm involvement with Kalshi. The reported trade involved intermediaries like Game Point Capital and Greenlight Commodities, with quant firm Susquehanna as the counterparty. This incident highlights the blurring line between financial hedging and gambling in prediction markets. Such markets allow trading on future event outcomes, like sports results. In the US, Kalshi operates as a regulated event contract market under the CFTC. However, Spanish authorities recently initiated penalties against Kalshi and Polymarket, considering their activities unlicensed gambling. The case raises core questions about prediction markets: who can trade, how insider information is handled, and whether participants can influence outcomes, especially in sports where results are human-driven. While leagues like La Liga and Serie A have partnered with Polymarket in North America, the regulatory clash and potential for conflicts of interest, as seen in this club's alleged transaction, present significant challenges as prediction markets evolve toward institutional risk management.

Foresight News6 мин. назад

La Liga Team Bets $1 Million Against Themselves Before Match: Does Using Prediction Markets for Insurance Comply with Sports Regulations?

Foresight News6 мин. назад

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

How much of Arthur Hayes's market credibility remains? Recently, the "godfather of crypto perpetual swaps" and BitMEX co-founder has faced public criticism, including accusations from on-chain investigator ZachXBT about creating exit liquidity for his followers. Starting last week, Hayes executed multiple sudden sell-offs. He had repeatedly publicly predicted the HYPE token would reach $150. After a $100,000 bet defending Hyperliquid on June 1st, he announced just three days later that he had completely sold his HYPE and NEAR holdings, successfully exiting near the peak. He also sold ZEC and WLD. His sale of WLD appeared to be a classic "pump and dump" maneuver. On June 3rd, he publicly set a $10 target for WLD, causing its price to surge over 35%. By June 6th, he announced he had sold his WLD, citing "anomalous" SpaceX pre-IPO price action, which triggered a sharp price drop. On June 9th, Hayes published a lengthy article explaining his actions, citing factors like rising energy costs and a potential AI bubble burst. Consequently, his family office, Maelstrom, now holds positions in US energy producers and only core crypto assets BTC and ETH, having sold AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. This pattern is not new. In 2025, he similarly touted HYPE before selling it at what turned out to be a cycle peak, only to repurchase it at the next cycle's low. Similar scenarios played out with tokens like ETHFI and ENA. Long-term observers have developed a strategy: ignore Hayes's public statements but closely monitor his on-chain actions—be cautious following his buys, but decisively follow his sells. If he continues these tactics, especially as seen with the WLD case, his market credibility risks being permanently damaged. As Hayes himself admitted in his latest article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

marsbit24 мин. назад

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

marsbit24 мин. назад

From Calling for $150 to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

Arthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMEX and a prominent crypto figure, is facing scrutiny over his market credibility. Recent on-chain data and public criticism, notably from detective ZachXBT, question whether he uses his influence to create exit liquidity for his followers. Hayes has executed several abrupt sell-offs, including publicly advocating for HYPE to reach $150 before completely selling his holdings just three days later, after which the price dropped sharply. He similarly promoted WLD with a $10 target, only to sell his entire position three days afterward, citing vague concerns about SpaceX's pre-IPO activity and causing a significant price decline. Hayes justifies these moves with detailed macroeconomic analyses, such as a recent essay citing energy costs and AI market risks, explaining his shift into energy stocks and core cryptocurrencies BTC and ETH. However, his pattern of bullish public statements followed by unannounced sell-offs—previously seen with tokens like ETHFI and ENA—has led many investors to adopt a strategy of ignoring his commentary but closely monitoring his on-chain actions for sell signals. Analysts warn that this "cry wolf" pattern risks eroding his market trust, with Hayes himself admitting in a recent article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

Odaily星球日报28 мин. назад

From Calling for $150 to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

Odaily星球日报28 мин. назад

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

The article details a series of absurd and revealing anecdotes shared by Silicon Valley founders about their venture capital fundraising experiences, sparked by Greg Isenberg's story of pitching to a sleeping a16z partner. Founders describe surreal pitch meetings: one faced a barefoot, peanut-eating investor who offered triple the requested amount after 30 seconds; another performed a pitch in a VC's parked car; a founder discovered his audience understood no English beyond "yes." These stories highlight the often irrational and performative nature of fundraising. Beyond the absurdity, darker power imbalances are exposed. Stories include investors suggesting founders fire co-founders for their equity, blatant market misjudgments, disrespectful behavior from LPs, and discriminatory remarks. A debate also emerges around "Sequoia's" practice of splitting a round into two valuations. However, the thread isn't solely critical. Positive counter-narratives celebrate supportive VCs who offered crucial advice during crises, respected founders' timelines, and showed simple gestures of respect—like a partner personally fetching coffee before a major pitch. Ultimately, the collective sharing acts as a pressure release, illustrating that fundraising is a complex dance of power, trust, and sometimes sheer theater. It underscores that beyond capital, mutual respect and integrity remain the most enduring foundations of the founder-investor relationship.

marsbit37 мин. назад

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

marsbit37 мин. назад

Taiwanese Nodes on the AI Industry Chain: 9 Taiwanese Stock Picks Favored by 'New Stock God' Serenity

Investment analyst Serenity has spotlighted 9 Taiwanese stocks positioned within three key themes of the AI hardware supply chain: CPO (Co-packaged Optics), ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits), and Compound Semiconductors. For the CPO theme, anchored by TSMC's COUPE platform expected to mass produce in 2026, Serenity highlighted five stocks: FOCI (fiber array unit supplier), Shunsin Technology (optical packaging & testing), Xintec (wafer-level packaging & testing), MSSCorps (inspection/measurement tools), and Nextronics (connectors & thermal modules). Regarding the ASIC theme, driven by hyperscalers' custom chips, three companies were named: Alchip (design services for AWS), Unimicron (ABF substrates for Google TPU/AWS), and MediaTek (potential collaboration on Google TPU). A singular, strong conviction pick is Win Semiconductor, a compound semiconductor foundry and leader in InP/GaAs, seen as a beneficiary in areas like laser sources for silicon photonics and LEO satellite communications. Serenity argues that current valuations are not in a bubble, geopolitical risks are overstated, and the real systemic risk lies not in cross-strait tensions but in potential future cuts to hyperscaler (Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta, Oracle) capital expenditure—the primary driver of the current AI infrastructure boom.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Taiwanese Nodes on the AI Industry Chain: 9 Taiwanese Stock Picks Favored by 'New Stock God' Serenity

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот

Фьючерсы

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на LAYER (LAYER) представлены ниже.