Backpack Surges Over 150% in Half a Month

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-06-15Обновлено 2026-06-15

Введение

BP, the token of the Backpack exchange, has surged over 150% since early June, driven by the platform's expansion into regulated US stock brokerage and asset tokenization services. On June 2nd, Backpack announced Backpack Securities, offering traditional stock trading and tokenization, causing BP's price to jump over 80%. Momentum continued on June 12th with the launch of SPCX, a tokenized product for SpaceX stock on Solana, facilitating seamless conversion between traditional securities and on-chain assets. This aligns with the RWA (Real World Assets) narrative, creating a bridge between traditional finance and Solana DeFi. The token's unique economics also support its growth. All 2.5 billion initially circulating tokens were airdropped to the community, with zero allocation to the team or investors at launch. A key feature allows users who stake BP for at least one year to gain the right to convert tokens into company equity upon an IPO or acquisition. Despite some initial community controversy over airdrop distribution, focus is shifting to BP's long-term utility and value alignment as real products launch.

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

On June 15, the Backpack exchange token BP surged over 30% again within 24 hours, currently quoted at $0.475 with a market cap of $118.48 million and a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $473.94 million. Since early June this year, BP has skyrocketed from around $0.16, breaking through a high of $0.48.

The direct catalyst for this market surge stems from the platform's latest breakthroughs in traditional U.S. stock brokerage and asset tokenization services.

Venturing into U.S. Stock Brokerage and Tokenization Business

In March 2026, BP completed its Token Generation Event (TGE) on Solana with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and an initial circulating supply of 250 million. After listing, the token price briefly touched a high point before rapidly declining, with a single-day drop exceeding 40% at its worst, as the market was once filled with profit-taking pressure. For several weeks thereafter, the price consolidated at lower levels until a turning point emerged in early June.

On June 2, Backpack announced the launch of the Backpack Securities platform, which will provide regulated U.S. stock brokerage services while also supporting the tokenization of traditional stocks for circulation on the blockchain, enabling seamless conversion between traditional securities and on-chain assets. The brokerage service is planned to launch gradually in June, with initial tokenized products rolled out in the Solana ecosystem through a partnership with Sunrise. BP skyrocketed over 80% in a single day, rapidly climbing from the $0.14-$0.15 range to around $0.27, with its market cap approaching $70 million at one point.

On June 12, coinciding with SpaceX's listing on NASDAQ, its tokenized product SPCX launched on Solana. In the subsequent 24 hours, BP rose approximately 27% further, pushing its price above $0.347. This token is pegged 1:1 to real SpaceX shares, supports 24/7 on-chain trading, and can be redeemed through a Backpack brokerage account into a traditional securities account, achieving interoperability between on-chain and off-chain assets. On its first day of launch, the product generated around $35-38 million in on-chain trading volume across DEXs like Jupiter and Raydium. According to the latest official data, the total on-chain SPCX trading volume exceeds $86 million.

Backpack is building a bridge between traditional U.S. stocks and Solana DeFi. Users can not only trade crypto assets within the platform but also access real stocks through the same account and tokenize portions of their assets for use, trading, or composition on-chain. This pathway aligns highly with the current RWA (Real World Assets) narrative and provides the BP token with clearer use cases and demand support.

BP's recent surge stems more from substantial platform business expansion than short-term speculation. Currently, its official website shows that Backpack's total custodied assets (nominal value) have rebounded to $390 million.

No Tokens for the Team Unless the Company Goes Public

Supporting the above business development is the BP token and its unique economic structure launched as early as March. The total supply of 1 billion tokens is divided into three phases: 25% (250 million) at TGE was entirely airdropped to community users, with approximately 240 million allocated to participants in the points program and 10 million to Mad Lads NFT holders. At launch, the team, founders, and investors received 0 token allocation; 37.5% in the Pre-IPO phase is tied to growth triggers such as regulatory milestones and product launches, continuing to be distributed to users upon unlocking; 37.5% in the Post-IPO phase enters the company treasury, locked for at least one year after an IPO, with the team benefiting only through equity, not directly through tokens.

The most attention-grabbing mechanism is the equity conversion design: users who stake BP for at least 1 year gain the right to convert their tokens into company equity upon an IPO or acquisition, with the bonus increasing with holding time up to the 4th year based on the initial unlock.

Additionally, staking provides benefits such as tiered trading fee discounts, extra yield on USD collateral, free wire transfers, and priority access to the Backpack Card. Currently, about 66% (approximately 165 million) of the circulating supply is staked.

While the airdrop process was technically smooth, it also sparked community discussion. Supporters argue that the "no insider TGE allocation" model is quite radical, and the points system genuinely rewarded trading and ecosystem participation. Criticism focused on the relatively strict Sybil filtering mechanism, which led to some long-term users having their points removed, resulting in lower-than-expected allocations, as well as noticeable profit-taking during the post-listing price correction. CEO Armani Ferrante publicly denied allegations of team OTC sales.

These controversies temporarily affected market sentiment, but as tangible products like Backpack Securities were launched, the focus is gradually shifting from allocation details to the platform's long-term growth and the token's actual utility. Against the backdrop of the platform's expansion into U.S. stock brokerage and tokenization services, the long-term alignment value of BP's staking and equity mechanisms is being reevaluated.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the key factor driving the recent sharp increase in the price of Backpack's BP token?

AThe key driver is Backpack's expansion into traditional U.S. stock brokerage and asset tokenization services through its new Backpack Securities platform, starting with the tokenized SpaceX (SPCX) offering on Solana.

QWhat is the unique feature of BP's tokenomics regarding team and investor allocation?

AAt TGE, 0 tokens were allocated to the team, founders, or investors. 100% of the initial circulating supply (25% of total) was airdropped to the community. Team members can only benefit through company equity (via a token conversion option post-IPO), not through direct token holdings.

QWhat significant milestone for Backpack occurred on June 12 alongside SpaceX's NASDAQ IPO?

AOn June 12, the tokenized product for SpaceX, SPCX, was launched on Solana. It is a 1:1 tokenized representation of real SpaceX stock, facilitating 24/7 on-chain trading.

QWhat major benefit can BP stakers obtain, and what percentage of the circulating supply is currently staked?

AStakers who lock BP for at least one year gain the right to convert their tokens into company equity upon an IPO or acquisition. Currently, approximately 66% (about 165 million) of the circulating supply is staked.

QWhat criticism did the BP token airdrop face from parts of the community?

ACriticism focused on the Sybil filtering mechanism being overly strict, which led to some long-term users having their points invalidated and receiving fewer tokens than expected. There were also accusations of team OTC selling, which the CEO denied.

Похожее

After Tokenization of Assets, How to Exit?

Title: How to Exit After Asset Tokenization? Author: Symbiotic Compiled by: Hu Tao, ChainCatcher Summary: Tokenization addresses how assets go on-chain but largely leaves the redemption question unresolved. While tokenized assets can settle instantly, the underlying redemption for assets like treasuries, private credit, or real estate can take from T+1 to 180 days. This gap hinders DeFi adoption of Real World Assets (RWAs). Three emerging models aim to provide instant exit liquidity, differing primarily in their capital structure and efficiency: 1. **Balance Sheet Model (e.g., Grove Basin):** A single entity (like Sky) provides immediate liquidity from its balance sheet, acting as a bridge during the settlement period. It offers simplicity and deep initial liquidity but is constrained by a single entity's capacity and risk appetite. 2. **Asset-Specific Vault Model (e.g., Upshift Clear):** Independent liquidity providers fund dedicated vaults for each supported asset, earning fees. It decentralizes capital sources but isolates liquidity and capital per asset, leading to potential fragmentation. 3. **Shared Liquidity Layer Model (e.g., Symbiotic Liquid Lane):** A shared capital pool supports multiple RWA types simultaneously. Funds remain productive between redemptions (e.g., earning yield in lending markets). Exits are settled via a competitive RFQ market. This model aims for higher capital efficiency, scalability across assets, and serves longer-duration assets like private credit. Key differentiators are: 1) Source of capital and risk bearer, 2) Redemption pricing mechanism, 3) Capital efficiency, 4) Scalability to new asset types, and 5) Composability. The shared liquidity layer model represents a move from piecemeal solutions toward scalable infrastructure, enabling T+0 exits by pooling capital, maintaining yield, and using competitive pricing, thus enhancing RWA utility in DeFi.

marsbit12 мин. назад

After Tokenization of Assets, How to Exit?

marsbit12 мин. назад

After Tokenizing Assets, How to Exit?

After tokenization, a key unresolved issue is providing holders with a reliable exit mechanism, as underlying asset settlement (taking days to months) lags far behind on-chain token settlement. Three primary models for instant liquidity have emerged, differing in their capital structure and efficiency: 1. **Balance Sheet Model (e.g., Grove Basin):** A single, well-capitalized entity (like Sky) provides immediate liquidity from its own reserves. This offers simplicity and deep initial liquidity but is constrained by that single balance sheet's capacity and risk appetite, limiting scalability. 2. **Dedicated Vault Model (e.g., Upshift Clear):** Independent liquidity providers (LPs) fund separate vaults for each supported asset. This decentralizes capital sources but isolates liquidity and capital, which becomes inefficient as the number of tokenized assets grows. 3. **Shared Liquidity Layer Model (Symbiotic Liquid Lane):** Independent capital providers fund shared vaults that can support multiple tokenized assets simultaneously. Capital remains productive between redemptions (e.g., earning yield in DeFi markets). Exits are settled via a competitive RFQ market where market makers bid. The article argues that the shared layer model offers superior capital efficiency and scalability. It transforms exit liquidity from an asset-specific patch into shared market infrastructure, allowing liquidity capacity to grow with overall market participation rather than being fragmented per asset. This is particularly valuable for longer-duration assets like private credit, where reliable T+0 exits can significantly enhance their utility in DeFi.

链捕手26 мин. назад

After Tokenizing Assets, How to Exit?

链捕手26 мин. назад

Anthropic's Triple Moment: Code Leak, Government Confrontation, and Weaponization

This article analyzes Anthropic's recent conflicts and strategic moves following the U.S. government's emergency halt of its new Fable model, citing national security concerns over potential "jailbreaks." The author argues this incident reveals deeper tensions between AI labs, governments, and the software industry. While critics view Anthropic's safety-focused rhetoric as marketing fear, the author suggests it serves as a commercial moat masking the company's core economic imperative: moving closer to end-users and their valuable data to avoid being commoditized. The piece outlines a coming clash between frontier AI labs like Anthropic and established software companies. Labs need real-world usage data for model improvement via reinforcement learning, creating a cycle where better products attract more users and more data. This threatens software firms who, as Microsoft's Satya Nadella warns, risk having their value captured by a few dominant models. Anthropic's controversial policy changes—initially secretly degrading Fable's performance for LLM development and expanding data retention—are framed as assertions of control, justified by its safety narrative. The company's foundational belief that it alone is sufficiently concerned about superintelligent AI dangers legitimizes its actions, from resisting government demands to shaping usage policies. The author concludes that this alignment of mission, talent, and business strategy is powerful but concerning, as it concentrates immense potential power in the hands of those convinced of their own righteous understanding.

marsbit36 мин. назад

Anthropic's Triple Moment: Code Leak, Government Confrontation, and Weaponization

marsbit36 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片