Analyst warns Bitcoin may enter ‘new redistribution phase’ – $63,700 next?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-08Обновлено 2026-03-08

Введение

The crypto market is experiencing cooling volatility after a period of heightened tension. Bitcoin, which peaked at $73,000 amid the US-Iran conflict, is now in a corrective phase, trading around $67,174. Analysts highlight $63,700 as a critical on-chain support level; a break below could lead to further declines toward $57,000 or even $52,400. A drop to $48,700 would signal a stronger correction and challenge the medium-term bullish outlook. Analyst Joao Wedson warns that losing key structural levels may mark the start of a "new redistribution phase." Bitcoin's current trading range ($67k–$74k) places it in a "high heat" zone, indicating a stretched market. However, long-term holders remain calm, with the Cumulative Value Days Destroyed (CVDD) metric at 0.34—well below the 2.0 level typical of market tops—suggesting accumulation rather than distribution. Short-term signals remain weak, with the MVRV Ratio near -10%, indicating unrealized losses for recent buyers. Market sentiment reflects "Extreme Fear," with a reading of 12 on the Crypto Fear & Greed Index. Upcoming geopolitical developments, particularly potential Middle East ceasefire talks, could influence Bitcoin's direction. A ceasefire may boost risk appetite, while prolonged tensions could favor traditional safe-haven assets, potentially limiting Bitcoin's upside above $70,000.

The crypto market is currently navigating a period of cooling volatility following a high-stakes week of global tension.

After a significant rally fueled by the fallout of the US-Iran conflict, which pushed Bitcoin to a peak of $73,000, the leading cryptocurrency has entered a corrective phase.

As of press time, BTC was trading at $67,174, marking a modest 1.25% decline over the last 24 hours.

Despite the pullback since the 6th of March, the price action remains constructive for bulls as long as it stays North of the $65,000 psychological support level.

However, analysts are closely watching the $63,700 on-chain level as a critical support. If this level breaks, downside risks could increase, with $57,000 as the first major support, followed by $52,400.

A deeper drop toward $48,700 would signal a much stronger correction and could force a reassessment of Bitcoin’s medium-term bullish outlook.

For now, the battle is for the $63,000–$65,000 range.

Analysts and their fears surrounding Bitcoin

Remarking on the same, Joao Wedson, Founder and CEO of Alphractal, said,

“When the market loses key on-chain structural levels, it often marks the beginning of a new redistribution phase.”

Explaining his fear with some context, Wedson also attached a Fibonacci-Adjusted Market Mean Price model chart.

According to the chart, when Bitcoin [BTC] trades within the lower green and blue bands, it usually signals strong accumulation and sustainable growth.

However, as of early March 2026, Bitcoin trading between $67,000 and $74,000 has pushed it into the yellow-to-orange “high heat” zone, meaning the market is becoming stretched.

While it hasn’t reached the extreme red-zone peaks seen during past market tops, it has moved beyond the steady growth phase into a more volatile, late-cycle stage.

Adding more weight to the current situation, market decoder – Darkfost noted,

“While volatility is in full swing across the markets and everyone seems to be reacting, some participants remain calm and simply observe.”

The analyst noted that while some traders may be preparing to sell, long-term Bitcoin holders appear to be holding steady.

What do on-chain metrics tell us about Bitcoin?

As per Darkfost, the Cumulative Value Days Destroyed (CVDD) metric was around 0.34, showing very little movement of older coins.

Such low activity is typically associated with accumulation phases, where experienced investors prefer to hold rather than distribute.

Historically, major market tops begin forming only when CVDD rises above 2.0, signaling large-scale selling by long-term holders.

Since the metric remains far below that level, it suggests that long-term investors do not yet believe the market has reached its peak, despite Bitcoin trading in a higher valuation zone.

In contrast, short-term signals remain weak.

The 30-day MVRV Ratio and Active Addresses data analysed by AMBCrypto indicate Bitcoin was still recovering from February’s volatility.

While activity briefly spiked around the 10th of February, it likely reflected volatility-driven trading rather than real growth.

Meanwhile, the MVRV Ratio hovered near −10%. This meant many recent buyers still held unrealized losses.

That structure could create selling pressure if BTC approached its break-even levels.

‘Extreme Fear’ and upcoming events that will shape Bitcoin

Market sentiment remained fragile. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index showed Extreme Fear, with a reading near 12.

Even so, macro developments could shape the next directional move. Markets watched the 12th of March geopolitical timeline closely.

Some analysts expected diplomatic progress in the Middle East.

Oil prices also surged sharply during the week, increasing inflation concerns across global markets. That dynamic placed Bitcoin’s geopolitical hedge narrative under scrutiny.

A confirmed ceasefire could restore risk appetite and trigger a relief rally.

However, prolonged tensions and rising oil prices could push investors toward traditional safe-haven assets.

In that scenario, Bitcoin might struggle to reclaim levels above $70,000.


Final Summary

  • A break below $63,700 could trigger a deeper correction, with $57K and $52.4K as the next major downside levels.
  • The potential Middle East ceasefire could act as a catalyst, either restoring risk appetite or reinforcing caution if tensions persist.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the critical on-chain support level for Bitcoin that analysts are closely watching?

A$63,700

QAccording to the Alphractal CEO, what does it often mark when the market loses key on-chain structural levels?

AThe beginning of a new redistribution phase.

QWhat does a Cumulative Value Days Destroyed (CVDD) metric reading well below 2.0 suggest about long-term Bitcoin holders?

AIt suggests they are not selling on a large scale and do not yet believe the market has reached its peak.

QWhat was the reading on the Crypto Fear & Greed Index mentioned in the article, and what sentiment did it indicate?

AA reading near 12, indicating 'Extreme Fear'.

QWhat are the two potential outcomes for Bitcoin's price mentioned, depending on the developments in the Middle East?

AA confirmed ceasefire could trigger a relief rally, while prolonged tensions could cause Bitcoin to move towards traditional safe-haven assets and struggle to reclaim $70,000.

Похожее

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbit1 ч. назад

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit7 ч. назад

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit7 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片