Amid the OpenClaw Craze, CEXs Vie for AI Agent Trading Entry Points

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-03-16Обновлено 2026-03-16

Введение

Amid the OpenClaw trend, CEXs are competing to become the primary trading interface for AI Agents, rather than passively serving as liquidity providers. The core question is whether exchanges will retreat to the backend or proactively position themselves as the default financial infrastructure for Agents. While many portray the shift from trading apps to dialog-based interfaces as revolutionary, current practical applications are more limited—focusing primarily on research, filtering, alerts, and conditional judgments. Execution remains challenging due to unresolved issues around permissions, confirmation mechanisms, error handling, and liability. Therefore, the initial competition will likely center on perfecting pre-trade functionalities rather than full automation. Exchanges are now racing to modularize their trading capabilities, design secure permission systems, and secure default integration within platforms like Claude, OpenClaw, and ChatGPT. Although it is too early to predict whether this will reshape the industry structure, it is clear that trust and user habits cannot be built overnight. The key takeaway is that the industry is confronting a concrete emerging question: as AI Agents gradually take over parts of the trading workflow, who will become the default crypto financial operating system?

So exchanges aren't suddenly in love with AI this round; they are judging one thing: if in the future, the primary trading interface for a segment of users is no longer the candlestick chart but a dialog box, would they be content to retreat to the background, merely acting as a liquidity provider to be compared and switched, or would they proactively step forward to become the financial infrastructure that the Agent calls upon first.

It's Not Exchanges Doing AI, But the Market is Again Framing Interface Upgrades as a Revolution

But now is also the easiest moment to casually overstate the case, as if once exchanges launch Skills or MCP, the next-generation trading entry point has already shifted from the App to a dialog box. Reaching this conclusion now is still too premature.

What truly runs smoothly today are primarily the pre-trade actions like research, screening, alerts, and conditional judgments. When it actually comes to the execution layer, the problems remain unchanged: how to grant permissions, how to handle secondary confirmations, how to rollback failures, how to express risk warnings, and who ultimately bears the responsibility. Anyone who has seriously built a trading system knows there are no shortcuts here. Therefore, what this round of competition will likely look at first is not fully automated trading. More realistically, whoever can first streamline the pre-order layer will be more easily called by default by the Agent. Research, screening, information, alerts, and pre-order preparation—these things might sound less flashy, but they are the most likely to become real usage first.

Precisely because of this, what's worth watching in this wave is not that exchanges are chasing another AI trend, but that they are starting to compete for the same new position: Who can first organize their trading capabilities into callable modules? Who can first design permissions and security to be sufficiently trustworthy? And who can first secure the default entry point within new interfaces like Claude, OpenClaw, and ChatGPT?

As for whether this competition will ultimately reshape the industry landscape, it's still too early to tell. Interfaces can be launched first, but trust won't grow overnight; pages can be made compatible first, but user habits won't migrate immediately; products can promise a closed loop first, but real usage must go through rounds of trial and error.

But at least up to now, one thing is already clear: when exchanges start seriously revamping their interfaces, permissions, and capability modules, the industry shouldn't see just another AI hype cycle, but rather a more concrete question coming to the surface: After AI Agents gradually take over part of the pre-trade workflow, who will become the default-called crypto financial operating system?

Related Agent Tutorials

Binance AI Agent Skills Official Tutorial

OKX Agent Trade Kit: Building a BTC Dollar-Cost Averaging System (OpenClaw Integrated Edition)

Bitget GetClaw Official Minimalist Video Tutorial

Gate GateClaw Official Setup Tutorial

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main concern of exchanges in the current AI trend, according to the article?

AExchanges are not simply jumping on the AI bandwagon; they are strategically positioning themselves. They are deciding whether to remain passive liquidity providers or to proactively become the primary financial infrastructure that AI Agents default to for executing trades, especially as user interfaces shift from traditional charts to dialog boxes.

QWhat are the key challenges mentioned for fully automated AI execution of trades?

AThe major challenges for full automation include managing user permissions, implementing secondary confirmations, handling transaction failures and rollbacks, effectively communicating risk warnings, and determining legal liability. The article stresses that there are no shortcuts in building a robust trading system.

QWhat does the article suggest is the more realistic and immediate focus for exchanges in the AI Agent competition?

AThe immediate and more realistic competition is not about full auto-trading. Instead, it's about which exchange can first perfect the pre-trade process—such as research, filtering, alerts, and preparation—making their platform the default module that Agents call upon for these tasks.

QWhat new role are exchanges competing to establish in the ecosystem of AI Agents like Claude and OpenClaw?

AExchanges are competing to become the default 'crypto financial operating system' for AI Agents. This involves packaging their trading capabilities into callable modules and designing permission and security systems trustworthy enough to be integrated into new interfaces like Claude and OpenClaw.

QWhy does the article caution against declaring that dialog boxes have already replaced traditional apps as the primary trading interface?

AThe article argues it is too early to make that conclusion because while interfaces can be updated quickly, user trust and habits evolve much more slowly. Real-world adoption and reliability will require extensive testing and iteration, meaning the full transition is not an overnight event.

Похожее

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit5 ч. назад

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit5 ч. назад

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

DeepSeek-V4 has been released as a preview open-source model, featuring 1 million tokens of context length as a baseline capability—previously a premium feature locked behind enterprise paywalls by major overseas AI firms. The official announcement, however, openly acknowledges computational constraints, particularly limited service throughput for the high-end DeepSeek-V4-Pro version due to restricted high-end computing power. Rather than competing on pure scale, DeepSeek adopts a pragmatic approach that balances algorithmic innovation with hardware realities in China’s AI ecosystem. The V4-Pro model uses a highly sparse architecture with 1.6T total parameters but only activates 49B during inference. It performs strongly in agentic coding, knowledge-intensive tasks, and STEM reasoning, competing closely with top-tier closed models like Gemini Pro 3.1 and Claude Opus 4.6 in certain scenarios. A key strategic product is the Flash edition, with 284B total parameters but only 13B activated—making it cost-effective and accessible for mid- and low-tier hardware, including domestic AI chips from Huawei (Ascend), Cambricon, and Hygon. This design supports broader adoption across developers and SMEs while stimulating China's domestic semiconductor ecosystem. Despite facing talent outflow and intense competition in user traffic—with rivals like Doubao and Qianwen leading in monthly active users—DeepSeek has maintained technical momentum. The release also comes amid reports of a new funding round targeting a valuation exceeding $10 billion, potentially setting a new record in China’s LLM sector. Ultimately, DeepSeek-V4 represents a shift toward open yet realistic infrastructure development in the constrained compute landscape of Chinese AI, emphasizing engineering efficiency and domestic hardware compatibility over pure model scale.

marsbit6 ч. назад

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

marsbit6 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

2025 год — год институциональных инвесторов, в будущем он будет доминировать в приложениях реального времени.

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.12.16Обновлено 2025.12.16

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на AI (AI) представлены ниже.

活动图片