After the Crypto Craze, What Is Changpeng Zhao Thinking?

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-27Обновлено 2026-01-27

Введение

In the post-crypto boom era, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) is shifting focus from short-term price speculation to long-term structural cycles, regulation, and government engagement. Speaking at Davos 2026, CZ avoided making specific price predictions but suggested Bitcoin could reach new highs in 2026 due to increasingly favorable regulatory environments, particularly in the U.S. and other countries. He revealed he is now acting as an unofficial coordinator between governments and the crypto industry, engaging with over a dozen countries on topics like regulatory frameworks, asset tokenization, and stablecoin design. CZ explicitly denied having any personal or business ties with Donald Trump, emphasizing that policy benefits are industry-wide, not personal. A key insight from his talk was the ongoing friction between traditional banking and crypto, with stablecoins serving as a temporary bridge. CZ’s evolution from a disruptive exchange CEO to a policy dialogue participant signals a broader industry shift from "price narrative" to "institution narrative." The new cycle is expected to be slower, longer, and more structured, driven by regulatory clarity and institutional maturity rather than mere market speculation.

Author: 137Labs

As the crypto market gradually cools and the narrative shifts toward long-term structures, the recent statements by Binance founder Changpeng Zhao provide a noteworthy perspective. This article does not focus on short-term price predictions but instead analyzes how he has shifted the discussion toward more macro variables such as cycles, governments, regulation, and time, based on his recent remarks at Davos. Through this shift, the article attempts to answer a more critical question: After the crypto craze, what stage has the industry truly entered?

At Davos, Changpeng Zhao (CZ) appeared more cautious than ever before.

The founder and former CEO of Binance no longer leads the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange. Yet, at the 2026 World Economic Forum, he remained a figure of interest for the media and policy circles.

The reason lies not in any radical price predictions he offered—quite the opposite, he almost deliberately avoided short-term judgments.

I. He No Longer Predicts Prices, But Talks About "Time"

In an interview with CNBC, when asked about Bitcoin's price, Changpeng Zhao's response was surprisingly conservative:

Short-term prices are almost impossible to predict.

But immediately after, he offered a more macro judgment—

The cryptocurrency market may be entering a structural cycle that lasts for years.

In his description, this is not a traditional bull-bear switch but more of a change in cycle patterns.

He mentioned that Bitcoin historically fluctuated in four-year cycles, but this pattern is now being influenced by changes in the policy environment.

II. Why Might This Cycle Be Different?

The core reason Zhao gave was not technological upgrades or the halving narrative, but politics and regulatory environment.

He pointed out:

· The U.S. attitude toward cryptocurrency is becoming more friendly

· Other countries are quickly following suit with similar policies

· Crypto assets are gradually being incorporated into a "regulatable, discussable" category

In this context, he believes:

Bitcoin could reach a new all-time high in 2026.

However, it's important to note that this is not a statement of bullishness but more of a judgment on a policy-driven cycle.

III. "I Am in Dialogue with About a Dozen Governments"

More noteworthy than his price predictions is Zhao's main focus now.

He revealed in the interview that he is in communication with about a dozen governments, discussing key topics including:

· Cryptocurrency regulatory frameworks

· Asset tokenization

· The design and issuance of stablecoins

This stands in stark contrast to his earlier image of "innovate first, regulate later."

Today, he更像是一名:

Unofficial coordinator navigating between governments and the crypto industry.

IV. Regarding Trump, He Chose a "Clarification with Distance"

As U.S. politics increasingly influences the crypto industry, speculation about the relationship between Changpeng Zhao and Donald Trump has frequently surfaced.

To this, he gave a very clear response:

· He has never met Trump in person

· There is no close personal or business relationship

· The so-called "relationship" stems more from overlapping policy environments

In his explanation, the logic is very clear:

Policy benefits are at the industry level, not the result of personal relationships.

V. An Easily Overlooked Detail:

Why "Bypass the Banks"?

When discussing a Binance-related investment completed using a $1 stablecoin, Zhao added a thought-provoking detail:

The only requirement for using cryptocurrency was to avoid dealing with the banking system.

This statement highlights a practical issue:

Even as regulation becomes clearer, structural friction still exists between the traditional financial system and the crypto industry.

And stablecoins are becoming a temporary solution to bridge the two.

VI. Why Are Governments Becoming the Decisive Variable in the New Cycle?

In the early crypto narrative, governments were often seen as external disruptions, with cycles driven primarily by technological breakthroughs and market sentiment.

But today, that logic is fading.

As crypto assets are incorporated into formal regulatory frameworks, the market's focus shifts from "can it be done" to "how to do it, and under what system." When rules begin to be systematically designed, cycles are no longer solely determined by risk appetite but start to be influenced by the pace of institutional progress.

Regulatory clarity, compliance paths, and the confirmation of legal status do not immediately drive up prices, but they reshape long-term expectations, attracting institutional capital and national-level projects.

In this context, the new cycle is likely to be slower, longer, and more restrained.

Extreme bubbles decrease, while infrastructure and institutions gradually take shape.

If the early crypto cycles relied on imagination, the next phase seems more driven by policy patience and institutional maturity.

Conclusion:

CZ's Transformation Might Be More Important Than His Predictions

If one only extracts a few sentences, Zhao's remarks can easily be interpreted as price predictions.

But what is truly worth noting is his change.

From exchange CEO to industry advisor;

From resisting regulation to participating in institutional discussions;

From talking about coin prices to talking about time.

This perhaps signifies one thing:

The crypto industry is moving from "price narrative" to "institutional narrative."

And this time, the rhythm of the cycle may no longer be determined solely by the market.

This article represents the author's personal views only and does not constitute any investment, legal, or financial advice. The views are based on public information and are for discussion and reference only.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main shift in Zhao Changpeng's (CZ) focus according to the article?

ACZ has shifted his focus from short-term price predictions and a 'build first, regulate later' approach to engaging in macro-level discussions about cycles, government relations, and regulatory frameworks. He is now acting more as an unofficial coordinator between governments and the crypto industry.

QWhat reason does CZ give for why the current crypto market cycle might be different from previous ones?

ACZ states that the core reason is not technological upgrades or the 'halving' narrative, but the changing political and regulatory environment, particularly more friendly attitudes from the U.S. and other countries, which is integrating crypto into a 'governable and discussable' category.

QWhat detail does CZ provide about his relationship with former U.S. President Donald Trump?

ACZ explicitly clarifies that he has never met Donald Trump in person and that there is no close personal or business relationship. He attributes any perceived connection to an overlap in policy environments, not personal rapport.

QAccording to the article, what role is stablecoin playing in the current crypto landscape?

AStablecoins are serving as a temporary solution to bridge the structural friction that still exists between the traditional banking system and the crypto industry, allowing transactions to be settled without directly dealing with banks.

QWhat does the article suggest is the new primary driver of the crypto market's long-term cycle?

AThe article suggests that government policy, regulatory clarity, and institutional maturity are becoming the key long-term drivers, shifting the cycle from being driven by market speculation and imagination to being shaped by policy patience and the pace of regulatory development.

Похожее

La Liga Team Bets $1 Million Against Themselves Before Match: Does Using Prediction Markets for Insurance Comply with Sports Regulations?

A Spanish La Liga club, reportedly Osasuna, purchased insurance against relegation and was linked to a transaction of over $1 million on the prediction market platform Kalshi, betting against its own victory in a crucial season-ending match. While Osasuna confirmed buying €1.2 million insurance for a potential €6 million payout in case of relegation through broker Howden, it did not confirm involvement with Kalshi. The reported trade involved intermediaries like Game Point Capital and Greenlight Commodities, with quant firm Susquehanna as the counterparty. This incident highlights the blurring line between financial hedging and gambling in prediction markets. Such markets allow trading on future event outcomes, like sports results. In the US, Kalshi operates as a regulated event contract market under the CFTC. However, Spanish authorities recently initiated penalties against Kalshi and Polymarket, considering their activities unlicensed gambling. The case raises core questions about prediction markets: who can trade, how insider information is handled, and whether participants can influence outcomes, especially in sports where results are human-driven. While leagues like La Liga and Serie A have partnered with Polymarket in North America, the regulatory clash and potential for conflicts of interest, as seen in this club's alleged transaction, present significant challenges as prediction markets evolve toward institutional risk management.

Foresight News7 мин. назад

La Liga Team Bets $1 Million Against Themselves Before Match: Does Using Prediction Markets for Insurance Comply with Sports Regulations?

Foresight News7 мин. назад

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

How much of Arthur Hayes's market credibility remains? Recently, the "godfather of crypto perpetual swaps" and BitMEX co-founder has faced public criticism, including accusations from on-chain investigator ZachXBT about creating exit liquidity for his followers. Starting last week, Hayes executed multiple sudden sell-offs. He had repeatedly publicly predicted the HYPE token would reach $150. After a $100,000 bet defending Hyperliquid on June 1st, he announced just three days later that he had completely sold his HYPE and NEAR holdings, successfully exiting near the peak. He also sold ZEC and WLD. His sale of WLD appeared to be a classic "pump and dump" maneuver. On June 3rd, he publicly set a $10 target for WLD, causing its price to surge over 35%. By June 6th, he announced he had sold his WLD, citing "anomalous" SpaceX pre-IPO price action, which triggered a sharp price drop. On June 9th, Hayes published a lengthy article explaining his actions, citing factors like rising energy costs and a potential AI bubble burst. Consequently, his family office, Maelstrom, now holds positions in US energy producers and only core crypto assets BTC and ETH, having sold AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. This pattern is not new. In 2025, he similarly touted HYPE before selling it at what turned out to be a cycle peak, only to repurchase it at the next cycle's low. Similar scenarios played out with tokens like ETHFI and ENA. Long-term observers have developed a strategy: ignore Hayes's public statements but closely monitor his on-chain actions—be cautious following his buys, but decisively follow his sells. If he continues these tactics, especially as seen with the WLD case, his market credibility risks being permanently damaged. As Hayes himself admitted in his latest article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

marsbit25 мин. назад

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

marsbit25 мин. назад

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

The article details a series of absurd and revealing anecdotes shared by Silicon Valley founders about their venture capital fundraising experiences, sparked by Greg Isenberg's story of pitching to a sleeping a16z partner. Founders describe surreal pitch meetings: one faced a barefoot, peanut-eating investor who offered triple the requested amount after 30 seconds; another performed a pitch in a VC's parked car; a founder discovered his audience understood no English beyond "yes." These stories highlight the often irrational and performative nature of fundraising. Beyond the absurdity, darker power imbalances are exposed. Stories include investors suggesting founders fire co-founders for their equity, blatant market misjudgments, disrespectful behavior from LPs, and discriminatory remarks. A debate also emerges around "Sequoia's" practice of splitting a round into two valuations. However, the thread isn't solely critical. Positive counter-narratives celebrate supportive VCs who offered crucial advice during crises, respected founders' timelines, and showed simple gestures of respect—like a partner personally fetching coffee before a major pitch. Ultimately, the collective sharing acts as a pressure release, illustrating that fundraising is a complex dance of power, trust, and sometimes sheer theater. It underscores that beyond capital, mutual respect and integrity remain the most enduring foundations of the founder-investor relationship.

marsbit39 мин. назад

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

marsbit39 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片