A Western Scholar's Field Notes from Visiting Chinese AI Labs: Humility, Openness, No Philosophy, Just Wanting to Train Better Models

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-08Обновлено 2026-05-08

Введение

An Impressed Western Scholar's Observations from a Tour of Chinese AI Labs: Humility, Openness, and Pragmatism A visiting Western academic's key takeaways from touring numerous Chinese AI companies highlight striking differences from the US ecosystem. Researchers in China displayed deep humility, frequently praising competitors like DeepSeek with genuine admiration. They operate in a remarkably open and collaborative atmosphere, often sharing research publicly, contrasting with the more guarded, zero-sum competition perceived in the West. The primary focus is intensely pragmatic: training better models. Philosophical debates about AI's societal impact or consciousness are largely absent; the drive is purely technical. Researchers are young, often PhD students working in industry, and are highly online and tool-savvy. Their passion is palpable when users engage with their models. Public sentiment also differs, with Chinese citizens showing greater optimism about AI's benefits compared to Western skepticism. While major closed-source players exist, the prevalence of open-source models fosters a unique cooperative spirit. The visit left the author optimistic about the future of open AI research and hopeful for increased international collaboration.

Author:Florian Brand

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide TechFlow Introduction: The context of this article is that SAIL (a media alliance that brings together top AI writers from Substack, including members like Nathan Lambert, Sebastian Raschka, ChinaTalk, etc.) organized a visit to Chinese AI labs. The author, Florian, joined the group and visited over a dozen companies including Moon's Dark Side, Xiaomi, MiniMax, Zhipu AI, Meituan, Alibaba, Ant Group, ModelScope, 01.AI, Unitree Robotics, and others. These are his impressions.

Florian Brand is a PhD student at Trier University and the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), focusing on the application and evaluation of large language models.

While not "famous" per se, he has some visibility within the open-source AI community. It's quite interesting to see the Chinese AI ecosystem from the first-person perspective of a foreign AI practitioner.

Main Text

For the past 10 days or so, I've had the privilege of visiting AI labs in China with my SAIL companions. As someone who visited both China and the US for the first time in six months, I found the differences fascinating, but the similarities were even more so.

What left the strongest impression on me was how humble all the AI researchers I met were.

They spoke highly of other labs and their peers. DeepSeek was mentioned frequently, likely because they had just released a model a few days before our visit. People talked about DeepSeek's paper with genuine admiration.

Many researchers are close friends with each other, hailing from the same university or hometown. They discuss their work candidly, with research results published as papers months later.

This is one of the biggest differences from the Western AI scene. In the U.S., the atmosphere often feels more like a zero-sum game. Labs are careful about positioning. Researchers think about competition, and some hold themselves in high regard. Leaders insult and attack each other in leaked memos. This difference might be explained by the fact that leading U.S. labs are closed-source, while many Chinese labs are open-source. Chinese labs have "a healthy respect" for ByteDance's Doubao, the most widely used chatbot, which is closed-source and holds a significant lead.

Meanwhile, the overall atmosphere is strikingly similar to San Francisco. Researchers are extremely online, reading extensively on Twitter and the increasingly popular Xiaohongshu. They all use Claude Code or their own CLIs to build the next model. Some monitored training runs during our meetings, watching the reward curves climb. They are thinking about further scaling and complaining about insufficient compute. They are frustrated with the current state of benchmarks.

Their main focus is training better models. This differs from San Francisco, where researchers ponder the political or philosophical implications of AI. They don't think about mass unemployment, a permanent underclass, or whether their models are conscious. They just want to train excellent models.

Their eyes light up when they hear you've used their model. They are eager to fix all the flaws of the current model in the next generation. They work overnight to push out model releases, yet still show up in the office afterwards.

Most researchers I met were young, many in their early 20s or around 25. Some were undergraduates, but more commonly they were PhD students working in the industry simultaneously. The consensus was that the industry is more interesting than academia right now, a view I strongly share, as I've done exactly the same thing. Labs place great importance on acquiring this kind of talent, actively recruiting interns and graduate students; something Western labs often don't do.

The researchers' optimism extends to the general public, who seem much more optimistic about technology and the future of AI and robotics. During the trip, people shared stories about their parents and grandparents using Doubao and DeepSeek for all sorts of tasks, including discussing mathematical theorems. This is noticeably different from the West, where the general public harbors animosity towards AI.

Overall, this trip gave me a tiny glimpse into this ecosystem. It's impossible to understand the culture of such a vast civilization in a few days. As a strong supporter of an open AI ecosystem and open research, I'm very optimistic about the future of both and hope for a lot of international collaboration ahead.

I want to thank all the amazing people we met at Moon's Dark Side, Xiaomi, MiniMax, Zhipu AI, Meituan, Alibaba, Ant Group's Lingxi, ModelScope, 01.AI, Unitree Robotics, and other places. Thank you for your time and warm hospitality. Also, thank you to SAIL for organizing the trip and to all the writers and journalists who participated. I'm incredibly grateful to have met so many outstanding and driven individuals in such a short time.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the most prominent difference between the attitudes of AI researchers in China and those in the West, as described in the article?

AThe most prominent difference is the mindset and focus. Chinese AI researchers were described as humble, collaborative, and openly admiring of each other's work, with a primary focus on simply training better models. In contrast, the Western AI scene (particularly the US) is portrayed as more of a zero-sum game, with labs being guarded about their positioning, researchers thinking about competition, and a greater tendency for leaders to engage in public disputes. Western researchers are also noted to spend more time contemplating the political and philosophical implications of AI.

QAccording to the author's observations, what is the primary focus of the AI researchers he met in China?

AThe primary and overwhelming focus of the AI researchers in China is on training better models. They are intensely practical, thinking about scaling, complaining about insufficient compute, and are frustrated with the current state of benchmarks. Unlike their Western counterparts, they do not spend significant time considering large-scale philosophical or political questions about AI, such as unemployment, societal class structures, or machine consciousness.

QHow does the article characterize the relationship between Chinese AI labs and the concept of 'open source'?

AThe article notes that many leading Chinese AI labs are open source, which is presented as a key factor contributing to their collaborative and less secretive culture. This is contrasted with the US, where leading labs are largely closed-source. The article mentions that even within China, the closed-source chatbot 'Doubao' from ByteDance is viewed with some apprehension by other labs due to its large lead and widespread usage.

QWhat demographic trend did the author observe among the researchers he met in Chinese AI labs?

AThe author observed that most of the researchers he met were very young, often in their early 20s or around 25 years old. Many were undergraduates or, more commonly, PhD students who were simultaneously working in the industry. There was a consensus that industry work is more interesting than academia, a view the author shares. Chinese labs actively recruit such young talent through internships and graduate programs, a practice the author notes is not common among Western labs.

QHow does the public sentiment towards AI in China compare to that in the West, based on the author's account?

ABased on anecdotal stories shared during the trip, the general public in China appears to be more optimistic and positive about technology and the prospects of AI and robotics. The author heard stories of parents and grandparents using AI chatbots like Doubao and DeepSeek for various practical tasks. This stands in stark contrast to the West, where the author states there is a prevailing sentiment of 'distaste' for AI among the general public.

Похожее

Vitalik: Building Index-Tracking Assets Based on Options Rather Than Debt

Vitalik Buterin proposes constructing index-tracking assets using synthetic options rather than debt-based mechanisms. The core problem is enabling exposure to a price index (T, e.g., USD/ETH) in a trust-minimized environment where only ETH is a trustless asset, relying solely on a decentralized oracle. Traditional approaches, like algorithmic stablecoins, use debt positions and require real-time, binding oracles for liquidations, which are difficult to secure. This article suggests a paradigm shift: eliminating liquidation and using options as the fundamental building block, requiring only a "slow" oracle. The design defines two synthetic assets, P and N, with parameters for the index T, a strike price S, and an expiry M. At any time, 1 ETH can be split to create a (P, N) pair or merged back. At expiry M, the oracle determines T's value x. P receives min(1, S/x) ETH, and N receives max(0, 1 - S/x) ETH. This structure inherently avoids insolvency risk (P+N=1) and can share an oracle with prediction markets. To gain stable exposure to T (e.g., USD), a user would hold deeply "in-the-money" P options (with S significantly below the current price) and periodically "roll" them to lower strikes as the price approaches the current strike, rebalancing their portfolio. This transfers the decision of *when* to act from a protocol-enforced liquidation (requiring a real-time oracle) to the user or an automated wrapper. Users can manage MEV risk and oracle dependency by choosing their rebalancing timing and data sources. A key trade-off is accepting some quadratic drift (deviation from perfect peg), estimated at 1-4% annualized volatility. Buterin argues this cost is reasonable compared to fiat currency volatility or equilibrium shifts in other stablecoins. The success of this model depends heavily on designing low-slippage market mechanisms for the rebalancing process, leveraging users' low time preference to execute trades patiently.

marsbit42 мин. назад

Vitalik: Building Index-Tracking Assets Based on Options Rather Than Debt

marsbit42 мин. назад

"Water Scarcity": The Hidden Fatal Flaw of AI Infrastructure

“Water Scarcity: The Hidden Vulnerability of AI Infrastructure” In June 2026, SpaceX revised its IPO prospectus to highlight a core resource constraint alongside power and processors: water. This move signals a pivotal shift where water scarcity has transformed from an operational cost to a major, uncontrollable investment risk, directly threatening AI data center expansion. The scale of the problem is immense. U.S. data centers consumed an estimated 17 billion gallons of water for direct cooling in 2023, with indirect water use for power generation exceeding 211 billion gallons. Giants like Google alone use billions of gallons annually, with single sites consuming volumes equivalent to a medium-sized city. This water is largely “consumptive,” evaporated into the atmosphere and lost. This massive demand is colliding with scarcity. Tech companies are building “water tigers” in arid regions, sparking community protests in places like Mexico and Arizona, where data centers can legally use millions of gallons daily—enough for tens of thousands of residents. These conflicts are not about illegality, but about a mismatch between historic water allocation frameworks and new, colossal demand. The consequences are real. Community opposition, largely centered on water, has reportedly stalled or canceled $64 billion in U.S. data center projects over two years. Simultaneously, investors are pressuring companies for greater water footprint transparency, viewing it as a financial risk, not just an ESG metric. Technological solutions like air or liquid cooling involve trade-offs between water and electricity use, with final choices dictated by local constraints. The irony is stark: while industry leaders envision AI as a utility “like water,” its physical infrastructure is straining real-world water supplies. The race for AI supremacy may ultimately be governed not by the fastest chip, but by the slowest water meter.

marsbit1 ч. назад

"Water Scarcity": The Hidden Fatal Flaw of AI Infrastructure

marsbit1 ч. назад

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

Global card issuance is entering a compliance-driven era, with WasabiCard building next-generation payment infrastructure. The platform asserts that as stablecoins increasingly enter cross-border payments, corporate settlements, and global commerce, the industry is shifting focus from "availability" and "growth-driven" models to long-term, compliant operation under global frameworks. Competition will center on sustainable compliance and global infrastructure capabilities. Stablecoins are evolving from on-chain assets into key payment tools in global business, with card issuance acting as critical infrastructure connecting digital assets to traditional payment networks like Visa and Mastercard. This expansion has revealed structural issues, including cross-regional issuance, BIN resource management, and insufficient AML and risk controls. In response, the industry is moving away from reliance on "grey efficiency" towards prioritizing compliance, risk management, and long-term operational stability. WasabiCard outlines its strategy: collaborating with licensed principals and local partners for localized operations, building robust KYC/AML systems, strictly separating commercial and consumer BIN usage, and enhancing global issuance, payment, and cross-border fund flow infrastructure. The goal is to build stable, scalable payment infrastructure amid evolving global regulations, shifting industry competition from scale to infrastructure capability. As stablecoins integrate further with global commerce, payment infrastructure will become a fundamental, embedded component of internet business. WasabiCard will continue to develop capabilities in global card issuance, stablecoin payments, cross-border fund flows, and API-driven financial workflows.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.4k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

2.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

活动图片