U.S. Court Clears Path for Nevada to Take Action Against Kalshi Prediction Market

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-20Обновлено 2026-03-20

Введение

A U.S. appeals court has allowed Nevada to proceed with legal action against prediction market platform Kalshi, denying the company’s request to block a potential temporary restraining order. This could force Kalshi to suspend operations in Nevada for about two weeks until a follow-up hearing. The dispute began in March 2025 when the Nevada Gaming Control Board issued a cease-and-desist order, arguing that Kalshi’s sports-related prediction contracts violate state gambling laws. Kalshi contends that its products are federally regulated by the CFTC, which supports its position. The ruling is a setback for Kalshi and may lead to an imminent temporary ban in the state.

A U.S. appeals court has permitted the state of Nevada to pursue legal action against predictionmarket platform Kalshi. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Kalshi’s request to block a possible temporary restraining order (TRO). If approved, Kalshi may have to stop operating in the state for a short time, likely around two weeks, until the next hearing.

What this Case carries

The problem began in March 2025 when Kalshi received a cease-and-desist order from the Nevada Gaming Control Board. Because it believes that sports-related prediction contracts violate state gambling laws, the regulator asked Kalshi to cease providing them. Kalshi countered that federalregulations, not state regulations, govern its products.

With the court decision, Nevada may now issue a temporary restraining order. Legal experts say that this order could come very soon, and Kalshi could be forced to stop operating in Nevada, and the ban could last at least two weeks.

Kalshi warned that it would face serious harm if the court did not intervene. The firm says that it could face multiple legal cases at the same time, and different courts might give conflicting decisions. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) supports Kalshi’s view. The CFTC says it has authority over prediction markets, while states like Nevada believe they also have control, especially for sports-related products.

The court’s decision represents a setback for Kalshi and provides an opportunity for Nevada to take more robust action. The next few days will be important, as a temporary ban on Kalshi in Nevada could be enforced soon. More updates are expected soon as the state court moves forward with the case.

Highlighted Crypto News:

FBI Issues Warning Over Fake ‘FBI Tokens’ on Tron Network

TagsCryptocurrencyKalshi

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat action did the U.S. appeals court allow Nevada to take against Kalshi?

AThe U.S. appeals court permitted Nevada to pursue legal action and denied Kalshi's request to block a possible temporary restraining order (TRO).

QWhy did the Nevada Gaming Control Board issue a cease-and-desist order to Kalshi in March 2025?

AThe Nevada Gaming Control Board issued the order because it believes Kalshi's sports-related prediction contracts violate state gambling laws.

QWhat is Kalshi's argument regarding the regulation of its prediction market products?

AKalshi argues that federal regulations, not state regulations, govern its products.

QWhich federal regulatory body supports Kalshi's position in this case?

AThe Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) supports Kalshi's view, stating it has authority over prediction markets.

QWhat potential immediate consequence could Kalshi face in Nevada following the court's decision?

AKalshi could face a temporary ban on operating in Nevada for at least two weeks if a temporary restraining order is issued.

Похожее

From "Global Computer/Settlement Layer" to "Bulletin Board": What Are Ethereum and Vitalik Trying to Achieve?

From "World Computer" to "Public Bulletin Board": Ethereum's New Vision For years, Ethereum has been widely viewed as a "world computer" or "global settlement layer," executing smart contracts and powering DeFi and NFTs. However, Vitalik Buterin recently proposed a fundamental shift in perspective: Ethereum's core value may not be its smart contract functionality, but rather a simpler primitive—a cryptographically secure, globally shared "public bulletin board." This "bulletin board" represents a neutral, uncensorable data availability layer. Anyone can read or write data to it, but no single entity—not even a government or Vitalik himself—can alter or erase it. This makes it ideal for applications like secure online voting (where votes are verifiable yet private), certificate revocation lists, and decentralized governance, where the need is not for complex computation but for immutable, publicly verifiable data storage. Technically, upgrades like EIP-4844 (Blob data) and the upcoming PeerDAS are expanding this "board's" capacity, aiming to make Ethereum the highest-security data attestation layer. The rise of AI further underscores the need for such a system. Current AI services tie user queries to real identities. Proposals like ZK API Usage Credits suggest using Ethereum and zero-knowledge proofs to enable anonymous AI API calls, where users prove they have usage credits without revealing who they are. Additionally, AI agents lack legal identities; Ethereum can serve as their economic coordination layer for transactions, staking, and reputation. This repositioning from "world computer" to "bulletin board" is not a reduction in ambition but a pragmatic evolution. It shifts the focus from what the technology can do to what the world actually needs—a foundational, trustless data infrastructure. Like TCP/IP for the internet, Ethereum aims to be the indispensable base layer upon which essential applications, especially in the AI era, can be built. Its ultimate value lies in providing a permanent, tamper-proof record of truth.

marsbit1 ч. назад

From "Global Computer/Settlement Layer" to "Bulletin Board": What Are Ethereum and Vitalik Trying to Achieve?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片