Centrifuge and Pharos Partner to Expand Onchain Access for Institutional Assets

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-17Обновлено 2026-02-17

Введение

Centrifuge and Pharos have partnered to enhance the distribution and usability of institutional-grade onchain assets, such as tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA). The collaboration addresses key challenges in institutional onchain finance, including fragmented distribution, regulatory barriers, and limited post-issuance activity outside the U.S. and Western Europe. By integrating Centrifuge’s tokenization infrastructure with Pharos’ high-performance Layer 1 blockchain, the partnership aims to create a unified ecosystem for asset accessibility, liquidity, and execution. Both CEOs emphasize that tokenization alone is insufficient—the focus is on building robust infrastructure to enable active, composable financial systems for institutional assets.

Today, Centrifuge and Pharos announced a collaboration aimed at facilitating the large-scale distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets onchain via a common infrastructure architecture, such as tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA).

The partnership focuses on addressing distribution, one of the main issues facing institutional onchain finance. Even though tokenization has advanced significantly, many institutional assets are still inaccessible, dispersed across platforms, or passive after they are issued. The goal of this collaboration is to make institutional assets useable in live onchain financial systems when they are issued.

Regulatory, onboarding, custody, and operational barriers still affect access to U.S. dollar-denominated credit and treasury products in many areas outside of the U.S. and Western Europe. Even with tokenization, these goods’ distribution is often dispersed and indirect, which restricts their capacity to actively spread once onchain or reach new users.

The collaboration tackles these issues at the system level by fusing Pharos’ inclusive, execution-first Layer 1 with Centrifuge’s institutional-grade tokenization infrastructure and asset standards. With its high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity, Pharos acts as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets issued via Centrifuge, enabling deeper onchain liquidity pathways and wider capital entrance. Assets may be accessible, pooled, allocated, and reused instead of being static after issue thanks to this integrated ecosystem, which includes wallet access, platform and enterprise channels, and execution capability.

“Tokenization alone does not solve the access and usability problem,” said Bhaji Illuminati, CEO of Centrifuge Labs. “This partnership focuses on building the distribution and infrastructure layer that allows institutional assets to function within real onchain financial environments.”

Pharos is an inclusive financial Layer 1 that uses a modular architecture and native deep-parallel execution to facilitate high-throughput, real-world financial operations. The network is designed to support ongoing onchain operations and accommodate significant institutional asset activity.

“The challenge isn’t demand, it’s infrastructure,” said Wish Wu, CEO of Pharos. “This collaboration focuses on creating an environment where institutional assets can move onchain and remain active within open, composable financial systems.”

This collaboration is a first step toward practical onchain finance, in which institutional assets are backed by infrastructure intended for long-term participation, distribution, and execution in addition to being represented onchain.

As the future financial-grade infrastructure of global finance for everyone, Pharos is the inclusive financial Layer 1 for RealFi, where institutional-grade assets and real value move onchain and may be combined with decentralized assets. To enable asset-native ecosystems, Pharos blends deep-parallel execution, modular design, and built-in compliance. Supported by Hack VC, Faction VC, and other international TradFi investors, the project was developed by Ant Group’s engineers and leadership.

TagsAltcoinBlockchain

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main goal of the partnership between Centrifuge and Pharos?

AThe main goal is to facilitate the large-scale distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets onchain, making them usable in live onchain financial systems upon issuance.

QWhat specific types of institutional assets are mentioned in the collaboration?

AThe collaboration focuses on tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA).

QAccording to Centrifuge Labs' CEO, what problem does tokenization alone not solve?

ATokenization alone does not solve the access and usability problem for institutional assets onchain.

QWhat role does Pharos play in this partnership according to the article?

APharos acts as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer with its high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity, enabling deeper onchain liquidity pathways and wider capital entrance.

QWhat are some key technical features of the Pharos network mentioned in the article?

APharos uses a modular architecture and native deep-parallel execution to facilitate high-throughput, real-world financial operations and support ongoing onchain institutional asset activity.

Похожее

War Doesn't Just Drive Up Oil Prices, Why Is Circle's Stock Price Soaring?

A class of companies, like defense contractors and oil giants, typically benefit from global instability. Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, unexpectedly joined this group as its stock price surged over 150% in five weeks, while the broader crypto market remained down 44% from its peak. The core of Circle's business is holding US Treasuries to back each USDC in circulation. The interest earned on these bonds constitutes about 90% of its quarterly revenue, making the Federal Funds rate its primary driver. The recent price surge was triggered by geopolitical conflict in the Middle East, which drove oil prices up approximately 35%. This raised inflation concerns, leading markets to drastically scale back expectations for Federal Reserve interest rate cuts in 2026. Higher-for-longer interest rates mean Circle's treasury reserves continue to generate elevated yields, translating to more revenue and a rising stock price. This macroeconomic shift caused a short squeeze, as a significant portion of Circl's stock was shorted based on the expectation of falling rates. However, the bullish narrative extends beyond a macro trade. Despite a net loss for FY2025, USDC's supply has reached a new all-time high of $79 billion, and its transaction volume now surpasses that of the larger USDT. This growth is attributed to its use as a payment infrastructure for cross-border transfers, tokenized assets, and AI agent micropayments, especially in regions where traditional banking becomes unreliable during crises. A major structural challenge is Circle's costly revenue-sharing agreement with Coinbase, which took 54 cents of every dollar Circle earned in 2024. The market is currently pricing Circle as both a high-yield play and a critical piece of future financial infrastructure. The central tension remains: its profitability is currently dependent on high interest rates, but its long-term value hinges on successfully transitioning to a business model sustained by transaction fees and payment network services, independent of the Fed's decisions.

marsbit48 мин. назад

War Doesn't Just Drive Up Oil Prices, Why Is Circle's Stock Price Soaring?

marsbit48 мин. назад

Tether Hires Big Four Auditor, USDT Enters Verifiable Stage for the First Time

Tether, the issuer of USDT, has hired Big Four firm KPMG to conduct a full financial audit of its $127 billion reserves. This marks a significant shift for the controversial stablecoin, moving it into a verifiable financial framework for the first time. Unlike previous attestations, which only confirmed reserves at a point in time, a GAAP-based audit will examine asset origins, internal controls, and financial reliability over time. This development is seen as more impactful than pending legislation, as institutional adoption relies on audited financials rather than regulatory promises. If KPMG issues an unqualified opinion, Tether’s credibility could be fundamentally upgraded, pressuring other stablecoin issuers without Big Four audits to follow suit. The move may accelerate institutional adoption by pensions, corporates, and payment firms, while reshaping the stablecoin landscape. Despite years of regulatory scrutiny and skepticism, Tether has maintained dominance due to its global liquidity and accessibility. An audit could reposition USDT from a contested asset to a verifiable financial instrument, reducing counterparty risk and encouraging broader use in digital infrastructure. The outcome of the audit will be critical: a clean opinion may validate the entire asset class, while a qualified one could introduce new challenges. The industry is watching closely, as this audit could signal a new phase of institutional acceptance for stablecoins.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Tether Hires Big Four Auditor, USDT Enters Verifiable Stage for the First Time

marsbit2 ч. назад

1 Dollar Return Rate Only 43%, Why Are 87% of Polymarket Users Losing Money?

In the prediction market Polymarket, analysis of 72.1 million trades reveals that 87% of wallets lose money, while only 13% consistently profit. The key difference lies in the application of game theory and mathematical strategies, not luck. Five core formulas separate winners from losers: 1. **Expected Value (EV)**: Winners calculate EV to identify undervalued contracts, while most traders rely on intuition. Makers (limit order placers) profit by waiting for positive EV opportunities, while takers (market buyers) lose ~1.12% per trade on average. 2. **Mispricing**: Low-probability contracts (e.g., priced at 1¢) are systematically overpriced, with actual win rates as low as 0.43% (a -57% deviation). High-probability contracts are often undervalued. Takers overpay for "cheap" lottery-like bets, while makers capture this inefficiency. 3. **Kelly Criterion**: Used for optimal position sizing. It maximizes long-term growth but is often applied fractionally (e.g., 1/2 or 1/4 Kelly) to reduce volatility. 4. **Bayesian Updating**: Profitable traders adjust probabilities rationally as new information emerges, unlike emotional overreactions or inertia from others. 5. **Nash Equilibrium**: The market structure evolves with participant behavior. In emotional markets (e.g., sports, entertainment), mispricing creates opportunities for contrarian strategies. As professional market makers enter, spreads tighten, and inefficiencies shrink. The conclusion: Persistent losses stem from emotional trading, overpaying for low-probability bets, and neglecting mathematical discipline. The winning minority uses these formulas to exploit market biases systematically.

Odaily星球日报2 ч. назад

1 Dollar Return Rate Only 43%, Why Are 87% of Polymarket Users Losing Money?

Odaily星球日报2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片