30-Year Treasury Yield Breaks 5% Again: The Era of 'Everything Is Cheap' Is Over

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-06-01Обновлено 2026-06-01

Введение

The yield on the 30-year U.S. Treasury bond has again surpassed 5%, signaling a fundamental shift as markets begin to accept that high interest rates are here to stay. This reflects the simultaneous breakdown of three pillars that underpinned half a century of low inflation and low rates: cheap capital, cheap labor, and cheap energy. Global capital flows are shifting, energy security is strained, and labor costs are rising due to shortages and unionization, though partly offset by AI's impact. Long-term pressures like soaring government debt, geopolitical friction, and populism are also pushing up long-term borrowing costs. The role of AI remains the biggest uncertainty—it could boost productivity and lower debt or become a new source of inflation if it merely automates jobs while consuming vast resources. The core challenge for investors is adapting their models and expectations, calibrated during decades of cheap money, to this new, more persistent high-rate environment.

The yield on the 30-year Treasury bond has once again broken through 5%. This time, the market's reaction is markedly different from that in 2023—investors are beginning to truly accept the reality that high interest rates will persist for a long time.

Analysis points out that behind this lies a deeper structural shift: the three pillars supporting low inflation and low interest rates in the U.S. over the past 50 years—cheap capital, cheap labor, and cheap energy—are simultaneously eroding. And the direction of AI will be the biggest unknown determining future inflation trends.

The yield on the 30-year U.S. Treasury bond recently broke through 5% again. Writing in the Financial Times, columnist Rana Foroohar points out that, unlike the brief breach of 5% in 2023 followed by a rapid decline, this time the market's reaction is distinctly different—investors finally seem to be truly accepting the reality that the U.S. is bidding farewell to the era of low interest rates and entering a new phase with more persistent and diverse inflationary pressures.

The article cites a recent report to clients by Apollo chief economist Torsten Sløk, which states, "Investors should position their portfolios for a persistent high interest rate environment in the short, medium, and long term."

Behind this lies a larger structural story: the three cheap factors that drove U.S. economic growth over the past 50 years—cheap capital, cheap labor, and cheap energy—are simultaneously reversing.

How Did Half a Century of "Cheap Dividends" Come About?

The nearly half-century-long downward trend in the 30-year Treasury yield, falling from around double-digit percentages in the early 1980s to about 1% during the pandemic, was not an accident.

It was underpinned by a complete macro logic:

Cheap Capital: Decades of globalization and manufacturing technology advancements kept goods prices low; oil-exporting countries recycling massive petrodollars into the U.S. provided ample cheap funding; pension privatization reforms spurred enormous demand for various financial products; global investors vied to buy U.S. Treasuries, as no country was safer than America.

Cheap Labor: Outsourcing of industries, weakening of unions, automation waves, and the "shareholder primacy" corporate culture (emphasizing financial engineering over employee investment) collectively suppressed wages, especially for non-college-educated workers, persistently supporting corporate profit margins.

Cheap Energy: The petrodollar system helped curb inflation to some extent, and the global energy trade being settled in dollars also reinforced the dollar's global dominance.

These three pillars jointly supported half a century of low-inflation, low-interest-rate prosperity in the U.S.

The Three Pillars Are Simultaneously Loosening

In her article, Rana Foroohar notes that each of these supporting factors is now changing.

On the Capital Front: With each U.S. Treasury auction, international buyers are decreasing, not increasing. Deglobalization and supply chain reshoring will push up goods and services prices in the short term. Meanwhile, the foundation of the petrodollar system is being eroded.

On the Energy Front: Continued tensions in the Middle East directly impact Asian energy-importing countries. But in the longer term, this may accelerate the deployment of clean energy in major Asian nations—while the U.S. is retreating from climate commitments. This means long-term capital flows may shift from the U.S. to major Asian countries.

On the Labor Front: In recent years, labor shortages, large-scale strikes (including successful union action in the auto industry), tighter immigration restrictions, and growth in union membership in some sectors (especially white-collar industries) have all pushed wages higher. However, this trend is being partly offset by two factors: one is rising corporate healthcare insurance costs, leading companies to hedge by suppressing wages; the other is the impact of artificial intelligence.

And Then There Are the Slow Variables: Debt, Geopolitics, and Populism

In addition to the explicit factors above, there are several "slow variables": rising government debt, intensifying geopolitical friction, and the spread of populism.

The combined effect of these risks is that lenders demand a higher risk premium to lend money out—especially for terms of several years.

This directly pushes up long-term interest rates, i.e., the yield on the 30-year Treasury bond.

AI: Savior or New Source of Inflation?

Of all the variables, the direction of artificial intelligence is the most difficult to judge, yet its impact could be the most far-reaching.

Rana Foroohar outlines two starkly different scenarios:

The Optimistic Scenario: The productivity benefits of AI diffuse widely across industries and individuals, creating new jobs and income sources. Models from Yale's Budget Lab show that in this scenario, U.S. national debt would fall significantly, and inflation would also recede.

The Pessimistic Scenario: AI serves merely as a tool for corporate layoffs, cost compression, and profit expansion, while the infrastructure construction of AI itself (consuming vast amounts of chips, land, water, and electricity) creates new inflationary pressures. The net effect is to raise, not lower, costs. Governments would also be forced to bail out displaced workers, increasing debt instead.

Currently, AI giants are voraciously consuming real estate, chips, water resources, and electricity, already pushing up the prices of these resources in the overall economy. The final outcome will likely take years to become clear.

The Real Challenge Facing Investors

The article's conclusion is direct and sobering: Most market participants have spent their entire careers in the "cheap era." Their intuition, models, and expectations were calibrated in a low-interest-rate environment.

And now, that environment is changing.

"Expectational inertia" is a powerful force—when the 30-year yield broke 5% in 2023, many thought it was just a brief anomaly that would soon recede. But this time, the market's reaction is already different.

Adjusting means abandoning old expectations. For investors accustomed to low interest rates, that is no easy task.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main reason behind the recent sustained rise in the 30-year US Treasury yield above 5%, according to the article?

AThe main reason is a deeper structural shift where the three pillars supporting low inflation and low interest rates in the US for the past 50 years—cheap capital, cheap labor, and cheap energy—are simultaneously eroding, leading investors to accept that a high-rate environment is here to stay.

QWhat were the three 'cheap pillars' that drove US economic growth for half a century?

AThe three pillars were cheap capital (from globalization, petrodollar recycling, and high demand for safe US debt), cheap labor (due to outsourcing, weaker unions, automation, and a 'shareholder-first' culture), and cheap energy (supported by the petrodollar system).

QHow might Artificial Intelligence (AI) contribute to future inflation, based on the pessimistic scenario described in the article?

AIn the pessimistic scenario, AI does not boost broad productivity but is used mainly for cost-cutting and layoffs. Meanwhile, AI infrastructure itself (consuming chips, real estate, water, and electricity) creates new inflationary pressures. Governments may also need to bail out displaced workers, increasing debt.

QBesides the three main pillars, what other 'slow-moving' factors are contributing to higher long-term interest rates?

AOther factors include rising government debt, increasing geopolitical friction, and the spread of populism. These factors increase risk premiums, meaning lenders demand higher yields for long-term loans, which pushes up long-end rates like the 30-year Treasury yield.

QWhy is adjusting to the new high-rate environment particularly challenging for investors, as stated in the article's conclusion?

AAdjusting is challenging because most market participants have spent their entire careers in the 'cheap era' of low interest rates. Their instincts, models, and expectations are calibrated for that environment, creating a powerful 'expectational inertia' that makes it difficult to abandon old assumptions.

Похожее

Trend in US Stocks: Jensen Huang's One Sentence Triggers $47 Billion Surge; Google Raises Funds for First Time in 20 Years

U.S. markets reached record highs on June 2nd, but the real story was the intensifying AI arms race, now pivoting from chip supremacy to a scramble for capital to fund compute infrastructure. The day highlighted two stark realities: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's endorsement of Marvell Technology as the "next trillion-dollar company" at Computex fueled a historic 32.5% surge, adding $47 billion to its value. Conversely, Alphabet announced its first equity raise in two decades—an $80 billion plan—signaling that even its massive cash flow can't keep pace with soaring AI capital expenditures, forecast to exceed $180 billion in 2026. While the S&P 500 closed above 7,600 for the first time, led by tech and semiconductor stocks (SOXX +5.79%), sector performance was mixed. Alphabet's 4% drop dragged down communications services, illustrating market anxiety over the unsustainable cost of the AI buildout. Hewlett Packard Enterprise soared 25% on stellar earnings, proving AI's benefits extend beyond chip designers to infrastructure providers. Beneath the index highs, concerns linger over extreme concentration in a few AI stocks and geopolitical tensions. The focus now shifts to upcoming economic data, particularly Friday's nonfarm payrolls, which could challenge the market's current "ignore rates, chase AI" mentality.

marsbit15 мин. назад

Trend in US Stocks: Jensen Huang's One Sentence Triggers $47 Billion Surge; Google Raises Funds for First Time in 20 Years

marsbit15 мин. назад

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

"DeepSeek and the $1 Trillion Infrastructure Question" The article examines whether DeepSeek's AI optimization breakthroughs could potentially save China $1 trillion in future AI infrastructure costs. The analysis begins with Nvidia's upcoming Vera Rubin AI platform, costing ~$7.8 million, where memory (HBM4/LPDDR5X) constitutes $2 million—a 435% cost increase in one year, highlighting how AI hardware spending is shifting toward expensive memory components. DeepSeek's approach works in the opposite direction. Through three key technical innovations showcased in DeepSeek V4, the company dramatically improves hardware efficiency: 1. **Memory Compression (MLA)**: Re-engineers the attention mechanism to compress long-context memory (KV Cache) by over 90%, drastically reducing expensive HBM usage. 2. **Selective Activation (MoE)**: Employs Mixture-of-Experts architecture where only a small fraction of parameters (e.g., 49B out of 1.6T in V4-Pro) are activated per token, allowing most parameters to reside in cheaper memory/SSD. 3. **Computation Caching**: Reuses previously computed results via cache hits, replacing expensive GPU computations with cheap memory reads. Combined, these optimizations allow the same hardware to produce approximately 4x more tokens, effectively reducing required hardware investment by 75%. DeepSeek's pricing reflects this: a 10-billion token workload costs ~$522 monthly versus ~$9,000-$10,000 for competitors. The $1 trillion savings projection stems from McKinsey's estimate that global AI infrastructure will require ~$5.2 trillion investment by 2030. As China's daily token consumption grows toward quadrillions, even marginal efficiency gains scale massively. With a conservative 4x throughput improvement, China could avoid building tens of thousands of AI data centers equivalent to ~7 trillion RMB ($1 trillion) in saved investment. Critically, this strategy shifts dependency from scarce, expensive GPU/HBM—where China lags—toward more accessible storage, caching, and systems engineering where domestic suppliers like CXMT are gaining strength. Rather than "replacing Nvidia," DeepSeek rebalances AI's value chain away from monolithic hardware dependency. Ultimately, DeepSeek's technical breakthroughs could lower the barrier to AI adoption across Chinese industries by making advanced capabilities affordable at scale—transforming who can access next-generation AI.

marsbit58 мин. назад

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

marsbit58 мин. назад

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

This paper, "Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward," proposes a paradigm shift in combating AI hallucination. It argues that the current mainstream approaches—striving for omniscience by scaling data/models or having AI abstain from uncertain answers—are fundamentally flawed. The former has inevitable knowledge gaps, while the latter imposes a crippling "utility tax," requiring the rejection of many correct answers to achieve high accuracy, due to models' poor "discrimination" (the ability to distinguish correct from incorrect answers internally). The core contribution is redefining hallucination not as "being wrong," but as "expressing false information with unwarranted certainty." The proposed solution is **Faithful Uncertainty** or **Metacognition**: enabling AI to accurately perceive its internal uncertainty and honestly express it in its language (e.g., using hedging phrases when unsure). This creates a more reliable assistant that provides useful information while signaling its confidence, minimizing harm from errors. The paper emphasizes that metacognition is critical for the era of AI Agents. Without it, Agents cannot intelligently decide when to use tools like search engines, leading to inefficiency and misuse. Key implementation challenges are highlighted: the "bootstrapping paradox" of training with static uncertainty data, the "alignment distortion signal" where human preference training suppresses internal uncertainty cues, and the difficulty of causally evaluating true metacognition vs. its superficial imitation. The paper concludes that the goal should not be an infallible AI, but one that is honest about the limits of its knowledge, thereby building user trust through transparent communication of its certainty.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

marsbit1 ч. назад

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

Bitcoin has recently declined, hitting a two-month low near $66,123, while Ethereum fell to a three-month low around $1,837. Analysts suggest the drop is not merely due to factors like ETF outflows or MicroStrategy's selling but reflects a deeper issue: Bitcoin is losing a broader asset competition. In a near-zero interest rate environment, Bitcoin previously thrived as an outlet for investor dissatisfaction with inflation and limited options. However, the market landscape has shifted. Bitcoin now occupies an "awkward middle ground," facing competition on three fronts. For inflation hedging, investors prefer gold, energy stocks, and commodity producers—assets with tangible backing and clearer pricing power. For growth exposure, AI-related companies with actual revenues and profits are more attractive. Even within crypto, investors can choose stablecoins, exchanges, or infrastructure firms tied directly to adoption, offering clearer business models and leverage. Thus, Bitcoin is no longer the top choice for hedging, growth, or crypto exposure. This shift is evident in market reactions: despite recent warnings about persistent inflation from a Fed official, Bitcoin did not rally as it might have in the past. Instead, capital flowed to assets with direct commodity or energy exposure. The recent ETF outflows and MicroStrategy sales are symptoms, not causes, of this new reality. Investors are becoming more selective, demanding clearer value propositions beyond mere scarcity. The emerging bear case for Bitcoin is not about it being a bubble or failed technology, but that scarcity alone is no longer sufficient.

华尔街日报1 ч. назад

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

华尔街日报1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить ERA

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Caldera (ERA) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Caldera (ERA).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Caldera (ERA)После приобретения вами Caldera (ERA) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Caldera (ERA)С легкостью торгуйте Caldera (ERA) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

723 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.07.17Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить ERA

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на ERA (ERA) представлены ниже.

活动图片