Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-06-12Обновлено 2026-06-12

Введение

On Thursday (June 11, U.S. Eastern Time), Wall Street staged a textbook V-shaped reversal. The Dow Jones surged 929.97 points (+1.86%) to close above 50,000, while the Nasdaq and S&P 500 rose 2.54% and 1.75%, respectively. The rally occurred despite the hottest PPI report in years, with May data showing a 6.5% year-on-year surge, the highest since 2022. The market ignored the inflation data, focusing instead on reports that former President Trump called off a planned strike on Iran, hinting at a potential multi-party peace agreement draft. This sparked a sharp drop in oil prices, fueling hopes that inflation may have peaked. Sector rotations were stark: previously battered AI hardware and cyclical stocks led the gains, while defensive sectors that hit record highs the prior day were sold off. Chip stocks like Micron and Intel saw sharp rebounds. In contrast, software giant Oracle plunged nearly 10% despite beating earnings, with concerns over cloud revenue and cash flow. Adobe also fell after hours despite raising guidance, as its CFO announced departure. The rally's sustainability is questioned, driven largely by social media posts about unconfirmed geopolitical developments. Inflation risks remain, with pipeline pressures still high. Meanwhile, the market's risk appetite faces a major test with SpaceX's historic IPO. Priced at $135 per share, it aims to raise ~$75 billion with a $1.75 trillion valuation, becoming the largest U.S. IPO ever. It will join the Nasdaq 100 in 1...

Author: Trend Research

Thursday (US Eastern Time, June 11) witnessed a textbook V-shaped reversal on Wall Street. Funds that were fleeing headlong from inflation and war the day before collectively reversed course within 24 hours.

The Dow Jones surged 929.97 points (+1.86%) to close at 50,848.75, recapturing the 50,000 mark; the Nasdaq rose 2.54% to 25,809.66; the S&P 500 gained 1.75% to 7,394.30. The Russell 2000 index led all major indices with a 3.02% gain. The VIX fear index fell nearly 12%, dropping back below 20.

The interesting part is that this big green candle emerged despite the hottest inflation data of the year.

Hottest PPI, Coldest Reaction

The May PPI released in the morning soared 6.5% year-over-year, the highest since November 2022; it rose 1.1% month-over-month, far exceeding the expected 0.7%. Breaking it down is even more startling: goods prices rose 2.8% month-over-month, the largest single-month increase since records for this data series began in 2009, with about 80% coming from energy—wholesale gasoline prices surged a staggering 23.4% in a single month. The first-stage intermediate demand prices, closer to the upstream pipeline, rose 3.2% month-over-month, also setting a historical record.

On any ordinary trading day, this data would be enough to knock the Nasdaq down 2%. But the market cared about only one thing: whether the war is about to end.

In the afternoon, Trump announced the cancellation of a scheduled strike against Iran that night, stating that Iran's top leadership had approved a draft multilateral consensus agreement, and allies including Israel had "agreed in principle." Upon the news, WTI crude oil plummeted over 4% intraday to around $86, and Brent fell below $89. Oil is the engine of this round of inflation; an oil price plunge directly dismantles the ammunition for PPI. Trump's own response to inflation was even more blunt: "I like, I like this inflation," and stated that once the war ends, oil prices will "fall like a rock."

The logical chain for funds was thus closed: draft agreement, oil price plunge, peak inflation expectations, buy everything. Sectors that fell the hardest the previous day—tech, industrials, materials—led the gains, while defensive sectors (consumer staples, real estate, energy), which hit record highs on Wednesday, were conversely sold off. In two trading sessions, the same batch of funds completed a full rotation from short to long.

Chip Stocks' Vengeful Rebound, Software Stocks' No Man's Land

The rebound firepower concentrated on AI hardware. Micron surged nearly 12%, erasing all of this week's losses in a single day; Sandisk rose 14%; Intel, upgraded by Bank of America, gained about 10% on the rationale of a surge in CPU orders; AMD rose 8%. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, counting from the crash on June 5th, completed its sentiment repair in just four trading sessions.

Software is a different world. Oracle plunged 9.56%, closing around $184. Beating earnings expectations was meaningless; the market focused on cloud revenue missing expectations, negative free cash flow of $23.7 billion, and a new $40 billion financing plan. After hours, Adobe delivered a standard "beat and raise" combo: Q2 revenue of $6.62 billion up 13%, full-year EPS guidance raised to $24.35 to $24.45, AI-related recurring revenue tripling year-over-year. The stock's response was a further drop of over 5% after hours. The trigger was CFO Dan Durn announcing his departure next Monday to join Marvell, following CEO Narayen's announcement of succession in March, making him the second core executive to leave Adobe in three months. The stock is down 38% year-to-date. At current prices, a company whose AI revenue has tripled is being priced as a victim of AI.

The same AI narrative: hardware is being scooped up, software is being abandoned. The market's subtext is brutal: the money in computing power is visible; software moats are not. The direction executives are voting with their feet coincides precisely with the stock price—the CFO is going to Marvell, a chip company.

Tonight, The Largest IPO in History Opens

Another motive for the late Thursday buying spree lies in Friday: SpaceX priced at $135 per share and officially debuts on Nasdaq tonight, ticker SPCX.

The scale of this deal is unprecedented: the base offering raises approximately $75 billion, nearly triple the previous record holder Saudi Aramco ($25.6 billion); the offering valuation is about $1.75 trillion, making it the seventh-largest US company by market cap upon listing, ahead of its sibling Tesla (approx. $1.6 trillion). Reports indicate subscription demand exceeded $250 billion, roughly 3.5 to 4 times the fundraising target. About 30% of the shares were allocated to retail investors, three times the industry norm. Musk retains over 82% of the voting power post-offering.

More noteworthy for traders is the follow-up: by rule, SpaceX will be added to the Nasdaq-100 Index 15 days after listing, at which point global index funds tracking QQQ will be forced to buy mechanically, estimated at $22 to $27 billion.

Risks are also clear. Senator Warren wrote to the SEC requesting a delay in the offering, questioning the valuation's detachment from financial fundamentals (annual revenue approx. $20 billion, implying a P/S ratio of about 88x) and the dual-class share structure; Morningstar directly gave it a "significantly overvalued" rating. There's a more practical issue: the $75 billion fundraising will drain liquidity from the secondary market within a week; part of the violent volatility in the storage and CPU sectors this week was the result of funds repositioning for the IPO.

Trend Observation

The quality of this rebound warrants a question mark.

Wednesday's 953-point plunge and Thursday's 930-point surge were driven by the same person's social media account. The draft agreement is not yet signed, confirmation from Iran still comes from unofficial channels, and historically this conflict has seen multiple reversals after being "close to a deal." If an index is pulled back from the cliff edge by a post, it can be pushed back over by another.

The inflation line also remains un-de-risked. The record surge in intermediate PPI demand is water already in the pipeline; even if oil prices peak immediately, it will still feed into CPI over the next two to three months. Pricing for a 25-basis-point rate hike in December remained unmoved after the data release; the ECB already hiked to 2.25% on Thursday, with the Fed, Bank of Japan, and Bank of England taking the stage next week. The market is betting on the perfect script: "war ends, oil prices plummet, rate hikes canceled"—all three links are indispensable.

Counterarguments are also on the table: core PPI month-over-month at 0.4% was below expectations, indicating that inflation momentum excluding energy is indeed slowing; Intel's CPU orders and Micron's demand are real orders, not sentiment; if a peace deal materializes, the inflation path corresponding to $86 oil will look completely different from this week's panic pricing. Bulls don't need a perfect script; they just need oil prices to stop making new highs.

Tonight's SPCX opening price will be the most honest gauge of this market's risk appetite. $75 billion in new shares, an 88x P/S ratio, 4x oversubscription—greed and skepticism will meet in the same candlestick.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the primary reason for the sharp market rebound on Thursday, June 11th, despite hot inflation data?

AThe primary reason for the sharp market rebound was news from former President Donald Trump, who announced the cancellation of a planned strike on Iran and indicated that a multilateral consensus agreement draft had been approved, raising hopes for an end to conflict. This led to a sharp drop in oil prices, fueling expectations that inflation may have peaked and prompting a broad market rally.

QHow did the performance of hardware (chip) stocks differ from software stocks during the market rally described in the article?

AHardware (chip) stocks, particularly in the AI sector, led the rally with strong gains, such as Micron (up nearly 12%), Intel (up about 10%), and AMD (up 8%). In contrast, software stocks like Oracle (down 9.56%) and Adobe (down over 5% after-hours) were sold off despite positive earnings, reflecting market skepticism about software's competitive moats compared to the more tangible demand for computing hardware.

QWhat are the key details and potential market impacts of SpaceX's (ticker SPCX) upcoming IPO as mentioned in the article?

ASpaceX's IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise approximately $75 billion, making it the largest IPO on record. It will have a valuation of around $1.75 trillion, ranking it as the seventh-largest U.S. company. Key market impacts include: significant liquidity being drawn from the market for subscriptions, its expected inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 index 15 days post-listing (triggering estimated $22-$27 billion in forced buying by index funds), and concerns over its high valuation (around 88x price-to-sales) and dual-class share structure.

QWhat concerns does the article raise about the sustainability and quality of the market rebound?

AThe article questions the rebound's sustainability, noting it was largely driven by social media posts regarding unconfirmed peace prospects, which could easily reverse. Inflation risks remain, as record-high intermediate demand PPI will likely feed into CPI in coming months. The market is betting on a 'perfect script' of war ending, oil prices crashing, and rate hikes being canceled, but any failure in this chain could undermine the rally. The high valuation and massive capital absorption of the SpaceX IPO also pose near-term risks to market liquidity and sentiment.

QAccording to the article, what is the market's implicit view on AI-related companies, as illustrated by the contrasting performance of hardware and software stocks?

AThe market's implicit view, as illustrated by the divergent performance, is a preference for AI hardware companies over software companies. The perception is that the demand and profits for computing power (chips, semiconductors) are more visible and secure, while the competitive advantages and monetization paths for AI software are less clear and more vulnerable, as evidenced by software companies' weak stock performance even with strong AI revenue growth and executive departures to hardware firms.

Похожее

The Gold Buy-on-the-Dip Guide: Watch Interest Rates, Not Just War

"Gold Buying Guide: Focus on Interest Rates, Not Just War" Four months ago, gold buyers likely didn't anticipate buying at a peak that even a war couldn't sustain. After hitting a record high of $5,596 on January 29, gold entered a bear market just 91 days later, its fastest decline since 2008. A key trigger was the Fed's hawkish shift, highlighting that monetary policy, not geopolitics, is the primary driver. The article argues that the traditional "buy gold in turmoil" script has changed. While the US-Iran conflict initially boosted prices, the sustained rally in oil prices heightened inflation fears, forcing central banks to maintain or consider tighter policy. Since gold yields no interest, higher rates increase its opportunity cost, eroding its appeal. This dynamic was evident when gold fell sharply on May 18 despite positive peace talks, as lower oil prices eased inflation and thus rate hike pressures. The recent sell-off is also part of a broader market deleveraging. Correlations between gold, Nasdaq, and Bitcoin spiked as leveraged investors sold liquid assets to cover losses, creating a synchronized downturn. Historically, gold bottoms align with policy shifts, not conflict resolutions. The 2008 and 2022 bear markets ended with shifts to extreme easing and peak inflation expectations, respectively. For potential buyers, the author suggests monitoring three signals: 1) Peak interest rate hike expectations, 2) Reopening of the Strait of Hormuz (to ease oil/inflation pressure), and 3) A return to net inflows for Gold ETFs, indicating the end of forced selling. While predicting the exact bottom is impossible, the author's personal strategy involves scaling into a position across price levels like $4000, $3700, and $3500, committing no more than 30% of the intended total allocation initially, and adding the remainder only if key signals emerge. The core conclusion: In turbulent times, watching interest rates is more crucial than watching wars.

marsbit4 мин. назад

The Gold Buy-on-the-Dip Guide: Watch Interest Rates, Not Just War

marsbit4 мин. назад

Recent On-Chain Review: No Clear Narrative Under U.S. Stock Market Pressure, Just Hype

This article analyzes the current state of the Solana meme coin and community token ecosystem, highlighting a market caught between two dominant forces: attention-based PvP and a gradual return to community-centric projects. The first part explores the "Attention PvP" dynamic, where success is driven by celebrity endorsements, viral events, and speed. Examples include $JOTCHUA, which surged after its meme creator's social media activity, and $WORLDCUP, which outperformed a similar Base chain project ($PITCH) largely due to influencer support. The recent "pump.fun GO" feature, allowing bounty tasks for token promotion, is critiqued for fostering sensationalist and often negative stunts—like people getting token tickers tattooed on their bodies for rewards—reminiscent of old internet shock content. In contrast, the article points to a resurgence of organic, community-driven tokens that survive market volatility through strong holder bases and shared ideology, not just hype. Influencer Ansem is cited, arguing that durable meme coins rely on communities willing to endure losses and promote their core message daily. Examples given are older tokens like $neet (anti-work ethos), $troll, $buttcoin, and $triplet, which have maintained relative price stability. A prime example of this community-build model is the new project $KINS, the token for the browser-based MMORPG Kintara. Its success stems not from advanced graphics but from consistently delivering updates, fostering player trust, and creating genuine engagement (e.g., in-game economies, events, property auctions). It has attracted a growing player base and even notable KOLs as participants, demonstrating that sustainable growth can come from building trust rather than orchestrating pumps. The article concludes by questioning whether the market is ultimately a game of mutual trust or mutual deception, expressing hope that such reflection might lead to a healthier ecosystem.

marsbit4 мин. назад

Recent On-Chain Review: No Clear Narrative Under U.S. Stock Market Pressure, Just Hype

marsbit4 мин. назад

On-Chain Scene on Opening Day: $20 Billion Already Staked, How Do On-Chain Contracts Know Who Wins?

On the opening day of the 2026 World Cup, over $2 billion had already been wagered on just the "tournament winner" contracts on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi. This article explores how these blockchain-based prediction markets actually function once the games begin. It breaks down the massive volume and explains how single-game and tournament-long contracts are priced, with values moving between 1-99 cents to reflect implied probabilities. A key mechanism highlighted is "elimination zeroing," where a team's "champion yes" contract immediately settles to zero once they are mathematically eliminated. The core technical question answered is: how does a smart contract "know" who won a real-world match? The answer lies in oracles. The article details two primary paradigms: UMA's "optimistic oracle" (used by most of Polymarket), which allows a challenge period after a proposed result, and Chainlink's multi-source data aggregation (used by FIFA partners like ADI Predictstreet), which automates settlement with minimal dispute windows. Finally, the article injects a note of caution, citing research estimating that a significant portion of historical trading volume on these platforms might be "wash trading" to inflate numbers. It concludes by contrasting the legal status of these "event contracts" under CFTC rules in the U.S. versus traditional, state-regulated sports betting. As the tournament progresses, the real-time operation of this multi-billion dollar machine—its settlements, eliminations, and underlying mechanisms—becomes a story as compelling as the football itself.

marsbit19 мин. назад

On-Chain Scene on Opening Day: $20 Billion Already Staked, How Do On-Chain Contracts Know Who Wins?

marsbit19 мин. назад

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片