When Vitalik Stops Blogging to Write Sci-Fi

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-28Обновлено 2026-05-28

Введение

Vitalik Buterin, founder of Ethereum, has announced a pause in his long-form technical blogging to instead write a science fiction novel exploring decentralized governance. The story, set in a fictional nation called Veridia, follows a member of a governance body that uses complex systems like quadratic voting, privacy-preserving audits, and AI-assisted decision-making to guide society through incentive structures rather than outright bans. This creative shift comes at a pivotal moment for the Ethereum ecosystem. The Ethereum Foundation has seen significant internal upheaval in 2026, with at least nine core contributors, including key protocol leaders, departing. Just days before his announcement, Vitalik published a statement addressing this turbulence, framing the Foundation as a "smaller ship" that will now focus on core principles like censorship resistance and security, while moving from a growth-oriented to a sustainability-focused organization. The novel's themes directly mirror Vitalik's long-standing technical interests in governance mechanisms. Community reactions are mixed: some see it as a thoughtful exploration of ideas through narrative, while others view the timing—amidst core team departures and a significant drop in ETH's price—as pointedly symbolic. The move is also interpreted as a personal transition, signaling Vitalik's evolving role from a central executive figure to one of many decentralized thought leaders within the Ethereum ecosystem.

Author: Claude, Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: On May 27th, Vitalik Buterin announced on Farcaster that he is pausing his long-form blog writing to focus on creating a science fiction novel centered on decentralized governance. He has completed two chapters so far.

The novel is set in a fictional country called "Veridia," which operates mechanisms like quadratic voting, privacy-protecting audits, and AI-assisted decision-making. The timing of this shift is noteworthy: by 2026, at least 9 core members have already left the Ethereum Foundation, the price of ETH has fallen below the $2,100 mark, and just three days prior, Vitalik himself announced that the Foundation would become a "smaller ship."

Vitalik, the founder of Ethereum, isn't writing technical blogs anymore. He's writing a novel...

On May 27th, Vitalik Buterin posted a brief statement on Farcaster: "Instead of continuing with regular blog posts, I've decided to try writing some sci-fi about decentralized governance," along with a link to the first two chapters on his personal website.

According to a BeInCrypto report on May 27th, this marks a rare formal shift in Buterin's public writing career.

Over the past decade, his long-form articles have essentially constituted first-hand literature for the evolution of Ethereum's ideas, covering nearly all core topics from L2 scaling and DAO governance to quadratic voting. Now, he's chosen to embed these ideas into a fictional narrative instead of continuing with EIP-style technical arguments.

This choice in itself isn't surprising. But the timing is hard not to think about:

Just three days prior, he published a lengthy post on X defending the Foundation's personnel turmoil. Two weeks ago, core leads of the Foundation's protocol team had collectively departed. The price of ETH has fallen more than 57% from its peak near $5,000 in August 2025.

"Veridia" in the Novel: The Governance System of Vitalik's Ideals

We had an AI quickly read the two completed chapters to see what Vitalik really wants to express.

The story of the two chapters takes place in a fictional country called Veridia. The protagonist, Gladias, is a novice member of the "Order of Steering." This organization is the core executive body of Veridia's governance system, responsible for maintaining a sophisticated set of tax and subsidy assessment rubrics, which replace traditional legal prohibitions.

Veridia's governance logic is clear: it almost never directly bans anything. The criminal code is extremely streamlined, replaced by a social governance system driven by tax rate incentives. A band wants to sing violent songs? No one will arrest them, but they might be classified into a higher tax bracket because of it.

The specific operation of this system is worth dissecting, as it's almost a fictionalized presentation of Vitalik's technical blog posts from the past few years:

The "Order of Steering" consists of three types of roles. "Keepers" are responsible for formulating and updating the tax assessment rubrics. "Sentinels" are responsible for auditing the classification of specific enterprises. A panel of 9 is randomly selected via cryptography, divided into three groups for independent deliberation, with the median of their votes taken. "Acolytes" are the reserve pool for Keepers and Sentinels, handling lower-priority audits. The system continuously scores them, and only the top 10% performers get promoted.

Privacy protection is the underlying logic of the entire system. Members of the Order wear uniform "privacy robes" to conceal their identities and are strictly forbidden from leaking audit tasks. Anyone can submit a guess through a decentralized cryptographic network to reveal a member's identity. If correct, the member gets a salary deduction, and the whistleblower gets half as a bounty. The goal of this mechanism is to prevent bribery and external influence.

In the first chapter, the protagonist also participates in another form of public governance: public aesthetic scoring. Citizens are randomly assigned to public goods (like billboards on buses) and score them using sliders. Here, quadratic voting—something Vitalik has championed for years—appears: all votes are automatically normalized so that each person's average score is zero and variance is one. Extreme votes compress your influence on other issues. The novel's line is that this mechanism is mathematically proven optimal—voting intensity should match the intensity of your true feelings, no more, no less.

The second chapter shifts scenes to an underground educational community called Dzego, where two students travel across the city for a physics class. Dzego's survival strategy is summarized in four words: "Rooted but leaderless." Classroom locations are decrypted via an encrypted broadcast announced just before class. The teaching venue is covered in signal-blocking foil, with security protocols frequently switching cryptographic proof systems.

What's Written into the Novel Is What Can't Be Pushed Through in Reality

Looking at the novel's content alone, it's just a cleverly conceived piece of governance sci-fi. But placed back into the context of Ethereum in 2026, the parallels become clear.

The "Order of Steering" in Veridia is a decentralized, anonymous, cryptographically protected governance organization with no single authority, where members are promoted based on performance rankings. In reality, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) in 2026 has experienced its most significant personnel exodus since its inception.

According to a comprehensive tally from a CoinDesk report on May 18th and an Unchained report on May 20th, at least 9 senior contributors have left or announced their impending departure from the Foundation since the start of 2026. Co-Executive Director Tomasz Stańczak resigned in February, serving less than a year; Operations and Writing Lead Josh Stark left in March after 7 years; Protocol Guild founder Trent Van Epps also left in April.

The impact in May was more concentrated.

Protocol Cluster co-leads Tim Beiko and Barnabé Monnot stepped down simultaneously, while Alex Stokes went on indefinite leave. Within the following week, early beacon chain design contributor Carl Beek (7-year tenure) and Julian Ma, core author of the anti-censorship mechanism FOCIL (EIP-7805), also announced their resignations.

On May 24th, just three days before announcing the novel, Vitalik posted a long thread on X responding to this personnel storm. He likened the Foundation to "a smaller ship," stating it would focus on the CROPS framework (Censorship Resistance, Centralization-resistance pressures, Openness, Privacy, Security). He acknowledged that the Foundation's original technical mission was largely complete by 2022, and it was now transitioning from an expansionary to a sustaining organization.

He also revealed that 90% of his net worth is still in ETH and that the Foundation holds only 0.16% of the total ETH supply, worth approximately $408 million.

"The Foundation is choosing to use its remaining resources to pursue longevity rather than breadth, and yes, that means we sell less ETH," Vitalik wrote. Interim Co-Executive Director Bastian Aue (who replaced Stańczak in February) is executing this transition.

Contrast this statement with Veridia's governance system in the novel: in the fiction, there's cryptographically guaranteed decentralized auditing, mathematically proven optimal quadratic voting, and AI-assisted but not human-replacing evaluation systems.

But in reality, the Foundation struggles to retain even its core R&D personnel, with governance discussions focusing on "who is leaving" and "why."

Community Reaction: The Novel Deserves a Serious Read, but the Timing Is Bittersweet

The community's reaction to Vitalik writing sci-fi itself has been relatively positive. A crypto.news report on May 27th commented that Buterin is essentially migrating his thoughts on decentralized governance from whitepapers and blog formats into speculative storytelling, using a fictional world to test the coordination, incentives, and power distribution issues he previously discussed in papers.

BeInCrypto's analysis pointed out that Vitalik has long advocated that quadratic voting and pluralistic mechanisms can dilute the influence of large token holders. The narrative format of the novel gives him space to dramatize these mechanisms within fictional cities and crisis scenarios.

His recent statement describing the Foundation as "one of many nodes" also explains why this announcement was posted on Farcaster rather than a centralized social platform.

However, more critical voices exist.

At a time when the Foundation has just lost almost all core members of its protocol team, the founder's allocation of energy is itself a signal. Vitalik himself laid the groundwork for this in his May 24th X thread—he explicitly stated that his power within the Foundation will continue to diminish, "which is what I want," and that the transition is being executed by Bastian Aue, not by him.

From this perspective, writing sci-fi is also a declaration of a role switch: he is no longer the core executor for the Foundation, but a node of thought within the Ethereum ecosystem.

This also aligns perfectly with Veridia's governance philosophy in the novel. Everything is going as planned.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhy did Vitalik Buterin announce he will stop writing regular blogs and start writing a sci-fi novel?

AVitalik Buterin announced he will stop writing regular technical blogs and start writing a sci-fi novel about decentralized governance to explore his ideas on coordination, incentives, and power distribution through speculative storytelling, a shift from his usual EIP-style technical arguments.

QWhat is the name of the fictional country in Vitalik Buterin's sci-fi novel, and what is its core governance principle?

AThe fictional country in Vitalik Buterin's sci-fi novel is called Veridia. Its core governance principle is to rarely prohibit anything directly, instead using a complex tax and subsidy incentive system driven by detailed 'rubrics' to guide societal behavior, replacing traditional legal bans.

QAccording to the article, what significant real-world event in the Ethereum ecosystem is happening concurrently with Vitalik's shift to writing fiction?

AConcurrently with Vitalik's shift to writing fiction, the Ethereum Foundation is experiencing its most severe personnel exodus, with at least 9 core members, including key protocol team leaders, having left or announced their departure in 2026.

QWhat mechanism from Vitalik's previous technical writings is featured in the novel's public aesthetics scoring system?

AThe novel's public aesthetics scoring system features Quadratic Voting, a mechanism Vitalik has long advocated. In the system, votes are normalized so each person's average score is zero with a variance of one, mathematically designed to ensure voting intensity matches the true strength of feeling.

QHow did Vitalik describe the future role of the Ethereum Foundation in his May 24th post, and how does it relate to his new activity?

AIn his May 24th post, Vitalik described the Ethereum Foundation as transforming into a 'smaller ship' focused on sustainability (the CROPS framework) rather than expansion. This shift, alongside his stated desire for his own power within the EF to diminish, contextualizes his move to writing fiction as a symbolic transition from a core executor to a thought leader or 'node' within the ecosystem.

Похожее

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

Title: Who Makes Money from Agents? The rise of AI Agents as potential blockchain users raises a crucial question: if they become the next billion users, who will capture the value? Traditional crypto value capture theories—like "fat protocols" (where value accrues to the base layer) and "fat applications" (where value accrues to user-facing apps)—assume human users who value UX, brand, and convenience. Agents, however, operate differently: they interact via APIs, have no brand loyalty, and can switch services with near-zero cost. This shift could disrupt existing value flows. Applications might become "headless," offering their routing and infrastructure as APIs to Agents. Alternatively, Agents might bypass intermediaries entirely, allowing protocols to regain value capture ("fat protocols" reborn). A more extreme scenario is that Agents, being purely rational and cost-sensitive, could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward marginal cost and turning crypto into a low-margin utility. However, Agents may not just amplify existing activities; they could enable entirely new ones—like continuous, sub-penny portfolio rebalancing, machine-to-machine commerce, and new market types only viable at automated speeds. This expands the economic pie rather than just redistributing it. Ultimately, the key question for builders is: what will make an Agent return to your service instead of a cheaper alternative? The answer may not be UX but factors like liquidity, latency, settlement guarantees, or a yet-unnamed business model. As humans and Agents will coexist as users, value capture may split: "fat apps" for human-facing services, and a new, evolving model for the Agent-dominated layer.

marsbit1 мин. назад

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

marsbit1 мин. назад

Base MCP, The Next Step for x402

Base has officially launched Base MCP, allowing users to connect their Base Account to AI Agents to perform actions like swaps, transfers, portfolio tracking, and transaction history queries through conversational commands. This move aligns with Base's strategic focus on AI, driven by the broader competition in the emerging Agent-to-Agent payment sector. The evolution of Agent payments has accelerated. In late 2024, the primary method involved insecure browser automation. By 2025, solutions like Coinbase's x402 (providing crypto wallets for Agents), Google's AP2, and Visa's token-based system emerged. x402 has since processed 176 million transactions totaling over $70 million, with a median value between $0.01 and $0.10. Stablecoins, particularly USDC, dominate these settlements due to their negligible transaction costs compared to traditional payment fees, which are prohibitive for micro-payments. Coinbase faces competition from Stripe, which has built a comparable infrastructure for Agent payments with its Tempo blockchain, Privy wallets, Bridge routing (acquired for $1.1B), and the recently launched MPP protocol. Both companies are now competing at the application layer. The core reason AI is central to Base's strategy is to expand the scenarios for Agent payments, ensuring more transactions occur on its network. By securing a dominant position and scale advantage in this nascent field, Coinbase aims to capture the future commercial potential of Agent-driven payments. The launch of Base MCP is thus a strategic step in this larger ambition.

marsbit7 мин. назад

Base MCP, The Next Step for x402

marsbit7 мин. назад

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

"Rethinking Ethereum's Value: The 'Vault Logic' Framework" Traditional valuation models incorrectly treat Ethereum as a company, valuing ETH based on transaction fees ("revenue"). This is flawed. Fees are network friction; a successful network aims to reduce them to zero. Ethereum's average fee has dropped from over $50 in 2021 to around $0.20 today, while transaction volume has tripled. Instead, view Ethereum as a digital vault securing ~$250 billion in on-chain assets (stablecoins, RWAs, L2 bridged funds, wBTC, etc.). Post-merge, Ethereum's security is directly purchased with its own asset: ETH. To attack the network, an attacker must acquire and control staked ETH. Therefore, the vault's security level is intrinsically tied to ETH's market value. Currently, the value of all staked ETH is only ~$72B, protecting ~$250B in assets—a dangerous imbalance. For robust security, the staked ETH securing the network should be valued significantly *higher* than the total value it protects. Applying a conservative security multiplier suggests ETH's fair value should be closer to ~$6,900 (vs. ~$2,070 currently). As on-chain asset value grows into the trillions, ETH's price must rise proportionally to maintain this security budget. Comparisons to free infrastructure like Linux or low-margin utilities like the DTCC are misguided. Their security is provided externally (community, law, banks). Ethereum's security is internal and must be purchased in the open market using ETH. ETH is not the clearinghouse; it is the collateral backing it. The model is not a short-term price predictor but a structural framework. The economic force for ETH appreciation grows monotonically with the adoption of Ethereum for settling value. The narrative that high fees are good is backwards; low fees enable more activity, which increases the value needing protection, thus demanding a more valuable ETH.

marsbit13 мин. назад

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

marsbit13 мин. назад

Justin Sun’s Interview with Hurun Report: A New Order and Certainty for Value Flow in the Era of Transformation

In an interview with *Hurun Report*, Justin Sun, founder of TRON, discussed the evolution of the Web3 industry as it moves from initial exploration to large-scale adoption. He emphasized that the core value of blockchain lies in building an open and inclusive internet of value, enabling anyone globally to transfer and use funds efficiently and at low cost, regardless of location or access to banking. Sun highlighted that projects with lasting impact are those built on genuine demand and real-world usage. He pointed to the stablecoin payment ecosystem as the most mature and scalable application currently, noting that TRON has rapidly become one of the world's largest stablecoin networks. The circulation of USDT on TRON has surpassed $86.3 billion, driven by actual use cases such as cross-border transfers and daily payments, demonstrating strong network effects. Regarding strategy, Sun outlined a methodology combining data-driven iteration, rapid execution, and user-centric focus. He cited the decision to partner with Tether to launch TRC-20 USDT as a key strategic move, based on an assessment of market trends and long-term potential, which has become a significant growth engine for the TRON ecosystem. On globalization, Sun stressed the importance of local compliance and cultural adaptation, noting that success in different markets depends on deep understanding and local partnerships. He also addressed the convergence of AI and blockchain, describing it as a transformative direction where blockchain provides decentralized infrastructure for AI, while AI enhances the intelligence and user experience of blockchain systems. For industry participants and young entrepreneurs, Sun advised continuous learning and adaptability in a fast-changing environment, focusing on building irreplaceable core strengths rather than spreading resources too thinly. Through infrastructure development, global strategy, and technological foresight, TRON aims to advance the practical implementation and evolution of the value internet.

marsbit45 мин. назад

Justin Sun’s Interview with Hurun Report: A New Order and Certainty for Value Flow in the Era of Transformation

marsbit45 мин. назад

Samsung Leverages Technology Cycles, SK Hynix Relies on HBM, What Enabled Micron to Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the Idaho-based memory chip maker, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion, securing its position as one of the top three DRAM manufacturers alongside Samsung and SK Hynix. Its survival and growth story is marked by a unique combination of political maneuvering and hard-won manufacturing efficiency, but also strategic missteps that now challenge its future. Founded in 1978 in Boise without significant government or capital backing, Micron repeatedly turned to Washington for survival during critical junctures. In the 1980s, it filed anti-dumping complaints against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which Micron had earlier licensed its 64K DRAM technology to. In 2002, Micron avoided heavy fines in a price-fixing investigation by acting as a whistleblower against its competitors, cementing its reputation as a "political opportunist." A major strategic error occurred in 2013 with its $2.5 billion acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. This deal burdened Micron with integrating incompatible manufacturing processes just as the industry was pivoting toward HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), a critical technology for AI. SK Hynix had launched its first HBM chip that same year. By the time AI demand exploded with ChatGPT in 2022, SK Hynix commanded about 85% of the HBM3 market, while Micron, playing catch-up, held only around 3%. In 2017, Micron employed similar tactics against a new competitor, Chinese startup Fujian Jinhua, by alleging intellectual property theft, which led to U.S. sanctions effectively crippling the firm. However, this strategy backfired in 2023 when China banned Micron's products from its critical infrastructure, causing its revenue share from China to plummet from 14% in FY2023 to just 7.1% by FY2025. Today, Micron faces a triple squeeze: it lags in the high-margin HBM race, faces pricing pressure in low-end DRAM from Chinese manufacturers like CXMT, and has lost crucial access to the booming Chinese AI server market. Despite its political strategies, Micron's core strength is its exceptional manufacturing cost control, achieved through decades of engineering. Its DRAM chips have a smaller cell area than its rivals, yielding more chips per wafer. This efficiency has been vital for weathering industry downturns. However, this advantage cannot compensate for the decade lost in HBM development. Micron is now racing to ramp up production of its HBM3E, certified by NVIDIA, and develop HBM4. Its future hinges on whether it can close this technological "time debt" through relentless R&D and execution, in a marathon where its competitors, having started earlier, are not slowing down.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Samsung Leverages Technology Cycles, SK Hynix Relies on HBM, What Enabled Micron to Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片