2026-04-18 Суббота

Новостной центр - Страница 179

Получайте криптоновости и тенденции рынка в режиме реального времени с помощью Новостного центра HTX.

Meta Spent $90 Billion to Close the Metaverse, $2 Billion to Let AI Live in Your Computer

Meta spent $90 billion to build the metaverse, only to shut down its flagship VR platform, Horizon Worlds, on June 15. The virtual world, launched in 2021 with great fanfare, failed to attract a meaningful user base despite massive investment. Its closure marks a symbolic end to Meta’s ambitious—and costly—bet on the metaverse, which accumulated nearly $90 billion in losses over seven years. Simultaneously, Meta is aggressively pivoting to AI. It acquired AI startup Manus for $2 billion, which recently launched a desktop version allowing AI to operate directly on users' local machines—reading files, running apps, and executing commands. In contrast to the metaverse’s weak adoption, Manus reached one million paid users within eight months. The shift is stark: Meta is cutting 20% of its workforce—around 15,000 jobs—and reallocating nearly its entire $115–135 billion capital expenditure budget toward AI infrastructure. This abrupt turn reflects industry-wide FOMO (fear of missing out) on AI, similar to the metaverse hype half a decade ago. Companies like Block, Shopify, and Amazon are also slashing jobs to fund AI investments. While Meta faces internal challenges—including delayed AI models and executive departures—its drastic realignment underscores a broader trend: the consensus has shifted from virtual worlds to ambient AI. The question remains whether this new bet will prove more sustainable than the last.

marsbit03/19 04:53

Meta Spent $90 Billion to Close the Metaverse, $2 Billion to Let AI Live in Your Computer

marsbit03/19 04:53

SpaceX Holds Nasdaq at the Negotiating Table, Hyperliquid Has Already Flipped the Table

Summary: The article examines the shifting power dynamics in global capital markets, driven by the rise of private funding and decentralized finance (DeFi). It begins by contrasting the 1971 launch of Nasdaq's electronic system with the current landscape, where companies like SpaceX can demand unprecedented concessions—such as accelerated inclusion in major indices—as a condition for their public listing. This reflects a fundamental change: massive private capital from funds like SoftBank's Vision Fund now allows firms like Revolut ($75B valuation) and Stripe ($159B valuation) to delay or de-prioritize IPOs, as they no longer rely on public markets for primary funding. However, public listing remains crucial for employee liquidity and VC exits. A new, critical motivator is the immense, stable capital from passive index funds. With passive assets now exceeding active management in the U.S., inclusion in indices like the Nasdaq 100 guarantees perpetual, non-discretionary buying pressure. SpaceX's negotiation for fast-track index inclusion highlights this strategic leverage. Simultaneously, traditional exchanges face disruption from DeFi. The piece cites Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange with 2025 volumes (~$3T) double that of Coinbase. Its growth in tokenized traditional assets (e.g., S&P 500 perpetual contracts) and 24/7 trading attracts professional traders, eroding the monopolies of institutions like NYSE and Nasdaq. In response, NYSE's parent ICE is investing in crypto platforms (e.g., OKX, Polymarket), acknowledging that future competition may come from DeFi protocols, not just rival exchanges. The conclusion is that the market structure is layering: old systems adapt (Nasdaq changing rules, ICE investing in crypto) while new, decentralized infrastructures grow, creating a future where the most powerful companies may not need to "knock on the door" of traditional exchanges at all.

marsbit03/19 04:40

SpaceX Holds Nasdaq at the Negotiating Table, Hyperliquid Has Already Flipped the Table

marsbit03/19 04:40

活动图片