Oil giant Exxon Mobil uses Bitcoin to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

cryptoslateОпубликовано 2022-03-25Обновлено 2022-03-25

Введение

Exxon Mobil uses excess natural gas to mine Bitcoin from oil wells in North Dakota.

Exxon Mobil uses excess natural gas to mine Bitcoin from oil wells in North Dakota. The waste gas would usually have to be burnt off in a process known as flaring. However, it is being repurposed to mine crypto using shipping containers filled with Bitcoin miners. Exxon has partnered with Crusoe Energy, a company backed by the Winklevoss Twins, to create the farms. Crusoe company president Cully Cavness said,

“Our systems reduce greenhouse gas emissions by the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of cars in the process, primarily by reducing the amount of methane escaping into the atmosphere from incomplete combustion in flares.”

From flaring to farming

The lack of pipeline infrastructure around the oil wells in the area means that companies cannot ordinarily harness the gas in any practical way. The carbon dioxide produced from flaring is estimated to make up around 25% of all CO2 produced by the oil and gas industry. This equates to approximately 281 million tons of CO2 annually. Devastatingly, about 5% of the world’s gas consumption is used up by flaring. Around 110 billion cubic meters or enough to power 72 million homes for a year is wasted through the process.

Texas Railroad Commissioner Jim Wright also promoted cryptocurrency mining to “eliminate the vast majority of flaring emissions and even pay the operator for the gas.” According to Bloomberg sources, Exxon Mobil is unsurprisingly looking to expand its Bitcoin mining activities. Further pilots in Alaska, Nigeria, and Argentina are in the works. Nigeria currently flares 76% of all the natural gas produced each year. Exxon Mobil has to pay fines for not meeting emissions targets due to flaring each year. By mining Bitcoin, they can reduce their penalties and generate income through holding Bitcoin. However, unless you are a shareholder in Exxon Mobil, the good news for the rest of us is that this can reduce CO2 emissions by over 60%.

How much Bitcoin has Exxon Mobil mined?

Amazingly, their on-site shipping container Bitcoin mines are capable of mining up to 37 BTC per month based on the reported energy usage. The average energy needed to mine 1 BTC is around 142,498 kWh which means we can predict Exxon has made $24,419,445 by mining BTC since last January. Using the new Antminer S19XP 140T that Bitmain selected Crusoe Energy to pilot, that figure could be as high as 1,261 BTC or $55,490,819. While all those figures are merely pocket-change for a company reporting profits of over $8 billion per quarter, it is an excellent use of energy that would otherwise be wasted.

More wasted energy than all of Bitcoin combined

However, to put all of this into perspective, the energy wasted each year on flaring equates to 1.1 trillion kWh of energy. That is enough to mine 18.4 million Bitcoin (ignore network difficulty to make the maths easier). As of today, 18.9 million have been mined. That means in one year the oil industry wastes as much energy as the entire Bitcoin blockchain ledger. The figures aren’t 100% accurate as I haven’t adjusted for the increase in network difficulty but the point remains. Before we focus all of our energy on banning proof of work coins perhaps we can take a look at industries that are literally throwing energy away? It is great that oil companies are reducing their greenhouse gas emissions now that there is a way to profit from it but we have a long way to go.

Похожее

Who Funds the Agents?

**Summary: Who Funds AI Agents?** OpenAI recently shut down a feature allowing AI agents to shop for users, highlighting the challenge of creating a secure and regulated environment for agent-driven transactions. While payment infrastructure exists, a crucial governance layer—defining spending limits, fraud detection, tax handling, and return policies—is largely missing. The potential is enormous: AI agents already processed $73M across 176M transactions last year, with McKinsey forecasting this could grow to $3-5T in global consumer commerce by 2030. The core competition isn't just about processing payments, which can be very cheap (especially with crypto-based settlement), but about controlling the rules that govern agent spending. Key players like Stripe and Coinbase are racing to dominate this governance layer. Stripe's acquisition of wallet provider Privy allows it to set spending policies, identity checks, and human-in-the-loop approvals directly at the wallet level. Similarly, Coinbase's stack, including its x402 protocol and AgentKit, embeds governance rules. This vertical integration across settlement, wallet, and governance layers is becoming the dominant strategy. Control over the governance layer is where significant future value lies. If agents handle trillions in transactions, even a small fee for managing compliance, fraud prevention, and policy enforcement could generate billions in annual revenue. The companies that successfully integrate across the payment stack will capture value from idle agent balances, transaction fees, and governance services, positioning themselves as the foundational banks of the AI agent economy.

marsbit26 мин. назад

Who Funds the Agents?

marsbit26 мин. назад

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

**Title: Great Powers Blockade Chips, Giants Buy Nuclear Plants: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI** In May 2026, the US closed loopholes for Chinese firms to acquire advanced NVIDIA chips via overseas subsidiaries. That same month, Kenya halted a $1B geothermal data center project involving Microsoft, fearing its immense energy consumption. Meanwhile, Huawei announced mass production of its Ascend AI chip. These disparate events underscore a new reality: the competition for computing power ("compute") has escalated beyond the tech industry, becoming a geopolitical and infrastructural battleground. A new era of oligopoly is forming, with control over the AI stack—from GPU chips (NVIDIA) and cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) to foundational models (OpenAI, Anthropic)—concentrating in a few Western "AI Octopus" corporations. This centralization creates systemic risks: pricing power and platform lock-in for users, infrastructure fragility, and a widening "compute divide" that threatens to marginalize nations without independent AI capacity. An "AI Iron Curtain" is deepening through export controls. In response, some nations like Saudi Arabia and the UAE are investing heavily to buy compute power, aiming to transition from oil to AI economies. The EU seeks to triple its compute capacity by 2030 to reduce dependency. However, the spending gap is vast, with four US tech giants alone planning ~$750B in AI capex for 2026. The race is increasingly constrained by energy, with AI tasks consuming up to 1000x more power than web searches, pushing firms to even acquire nuclear plants. This landscape is fueling interest in Decentralized AI (DeAI). It proposes a third way: using open protocols to coordinate a global network of idle GPUs, independent developers, and data centers, creating an AI infrastructure without a single controlling entity. Leveraging blockchain and cryptographic verification, DeAI aims to break market concentration, disperse energy demands, reduce geopolitical dependencies, and enhance transparency. While still nascent in performance and stability, DeAI's core promise is not immediate superiority but providing a crucial alternative architecture to resist monopoly, censorship, and centralized power. As specialized AI hardware costs fall and open-source models flourish, the window to build this foundation is open. The very existence of such competition serves as a vital check against the inevitable abuse of concentrated power.

marsbit1 ч. назад

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片