Polygon cae un 11% – ¿Puede la zona de demanda de POL en $0.90 detener más pérdidas?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-01Обновлено 2026-03-01

Введение

Polygon (POL) ha caído un 11% en 24 horas, acercándose a una zona de demanda crítica en 0,90 dólares. Este nivel es clave como soporte para un posible rebote técnico, respaldado por un RSI estocástico que indica presión de venta decreciente. Las reservas en exchanges comienzan a estabilizarse, lo que reduce la presión de venta inmediata. Sin embargo, las señales son mixtas: la disminución de direcciones de retiro y la reducción de inflows reflejan tanto la cautela de los holders como la débil demanda. El próximo movimiento en la zona de 0,90 dólares será decisivo. Si los compradores defienden el nivel, podría producirse un rebote. Pero una ruptura bajista aumentaría el riesgo de mayores pérdidas.

Polygon [POL] ha caído un 11% en las últimas 24 horas. Este retroceso ha acercado el precio a una zona de demanda crítica cerca de $0.90.

Ese nivel actúa ahora como la última línea de defensa importante si continúa la presión bajista.

Zona de demanda en foco

En el gráfico diario, la zona de $0.90 sirvió anteriormente como un fuerte soporte. Si los compradores intervienen nuevamente, podría desencadenar un rebote técnico. Sin embargo, las pruebas repetidas del soporte a menudo lo debilitan.

Al cierre de esta edición, el RSI estocástico de POL indicaba una presión de venta en desvanecimiento. El indicador clave de momentum también se acercaba a una región de sobreventa. Notablemente, la proximidad de la acción del precio a la zona de demanda se alineaba con el indicador de momentum.

Esto afirmó la zona como un punto de inflexión clave, especialmente con la reducción de direcciones de retiro.

Las posibilidades de un momentum bajista no pueden ser ignoradas por completo. Si el momentum bajista se acelera, una ruptura por debajo de $0.90 podría abrir la puerta a más caídas.

Las reservas de exchange muestran signos tempranos de estabilización

Las reservas de exchange también comenzaron a estabilizarse durante este tiempo, mostrando que los depósitos agresivos de POL en exchanges pueden estar disminuyendo.

Normalmente, la caída de las reservas en la red indica una reducción de la presión de venta inmediata. Eso mejora ligeramente las probabilidades de estabilización.

Las métricas on-chain de Polygon generan señales mixtas

El número de direcciones de retiro en la red de Polygon ha disminuido significativamente durante el mismo período.

Por lo general, menos retiros reflejan un movimiento reducido a corto plazo. También destaca que los tenedores están esperando en lugar de reposicionarse activamente.

Al mismo tiempo, las tendencias de entrada negativas ofrecieron cautela. Según el análisis reciente de datos de exchange de AMBCrypto, las Entradas Medias en Exchange de Polygon disminuyeron bruscamente en las últimas 24 horas.

Esto creó señales de sentimiento mixtas.

Menores entradas reducen la presión de venta directa, pero la actividad decreciente también puede reflejar una demanda débil.

¿Qué viene después para POL?

Polygon se encuentra ahora en un nivel técnico crítico.

Tal como está, si los compradores defienden los $0.90 y las reservas se mantienen estables, es posible un rebote de alivio. Sin embargo, si la presión bajista se reanuda, el riesgo bajista aumentará.

Mientras tanto, la próxima reacción en la zona de demanda probablemente determinará la dirección a corto plazo.

Resumen Final

Polygon cae un 11% a medida que el precio se acerca a la zona de demanda crítica de $0.90.
Las reservas de exchange que se estabilizan ofrecen esperanza, pero las señales mixtas de entrada mantienen vivos los riesgos a la baja.

Связанные с этим вопросы

Q¿Por qué ha caído el precio de Polygon (POL) un 11% en las últimas 24 horas?

AEl artículo no especifica una razón concreta para la caída del 11%, pero señala que este retroceso ha llevado el precio a acercarse a una zona de demanda crítica cercana a los $0.90.

Q¿Qué papel juega el nivel de $0.90 para el precio de POL?

AEl nivel de $0.90 actúa como una zona de demanda crítica y el último gran soporte. Si los compradores intervienen en ese nivel, podría desencadenar un rebote técnico. Sin embargo, si el precio se rompe por debajo, podría abrir la puerta a más pérdidas.

Q¿Qué indican las reservas de exchange sobre la presión de venta?

ALas reservas de exchange comenzaron a estabilizarse, lo que muestra que los depósitos agresivos de POL en los exchanges pueden estar disminuyendo. Esto indica una reducción de la presión de venta inmediata y mejora ligeramente las probabilidades de estabilización.

Q¿Qué señales mixtas muestran las métricas on-chain de Polygon?

ALas métricas on-chain muestran señales mixtas: la cantidad de direcciones de retiro ha disminuido (lo que refleja menos movimiento a corto plazo), pero también hay tendencias de entrada negativas. La disminución de las entradas reduce la presión de venta directa, pero también puede reflejar una demanda débil.

Q¿Cuáles son los posibles escenarios para el futuro de POL según el artículo?

ASi los compradores defienden el nivel de $0.90 y las reservas se mantienen estables, es posible un rebote de alivio. Por el contrario, si la presión bajista se reanuda, el riesgo de más caídas aumentará. La próxima reacción en la zona de demanda probablemente determinará la dirección a corto plazo.

Похожее

Bitcoin Decouples From Global M2 Liquidity As Money Supply Hits Record High

Bitcoin is diverging from a record-high global M2 money supply (over $135 trillion), challenging the historical assumption that rising liquidity directly lifts BTC prices. While a bullish view suggests Bitcoin is merely lagging and will eventually catch up as capital rotates into riskier assets, a more cautious "regime-change" argument posits that factors like spot ETFs, institutional flows, and a stronger dollar may have weakened the direct correlation. For traders, this divergence presents a clear macro question to monitor: whether Bitcoin's price will confirm a delayed rally or signal a lasting change in its relationship with global liquidity. The outcome will shape how future liquidity data is interpreted.

bitcoinist25 мин. назад

Bitcoin Decouples From Global M2 Liquidity As Money Supply Hits Record High

bitcoinist25 мин. назад

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit35 мин. назад

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit35 мин. назад

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit45 мин. назад

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit45 мин. назад

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit56 мин. назад

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit56 мин. назад

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit1 ч. назад

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот

Фьючерсы

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на PUSH (PUSH) представлены ниже.