How Ethereum Merge Will Impact Crypto Miners?

CoingapeОпубликовано 2022-08-05Обновлено 2022-08-05

Введение

Ethereum (ETH) miners have seen higher revenue than Bitcoin (BTC) miners in 2022, as the crypto community welcomes the second half of the year. Despite the devastating effects of the Crypto winter noticed in the space and the surging cost of electricity, miners of both assets have not relented. However, following the Merge, ETH miners could be faced with a loss of jobs.

Ethereum (ETH) miners have seen higher revenue than Bitcoin (BTC) miners in 2022, as the crypto community welcomes the second half of the year. Despite the devastating effects of the Crypto winter noticed in the space and the surging cost of electricity, miners of both assets have not relented. However, following the Merge, ETH miners could be faced with a loss of jobs.

ETH miners’ revenue is $1B higher than BTC miners’ this year
Per data from Arcane Research, ETH mining has generated a revenue of $11 billion this year, a little higher than the $10 billion BTC miners have seen in the same period. This pattern was noticed last year as well, when BTC mining saw a revenue of $17 billion – $1 billion less than the $18 billion ETH miners generated.
Prior to this, revenue generated from BTC mining had been steadily outpacing that of ETH mining. The turn of events witnessed in the past year and a half can be attributed to growing interest in ETH as the asset gains more traction due to the versatility of its ecosystem.
Nonetheless, the much anticipated Merge that would see the Ethereum Mainnet and the Beacon Chain coalesce – triggering the switch of the Ethereum network to PoS – threatens the jobs of ETH miners who are seeing billions of dollars in revenue annually.
The reality of ETH miners’ dilemma post-Merge
Following The Merge, ETH mining will become obsolete, and transaction validation on the network would be carried out by validators who would then be rewarded for their efforts, as is the status quo in a proof-of-stake blockchain.



Похожее

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

Analysis of Bitcoin Trading Strategies: Why Celebrity Forecasts and Classic Models Fail, Leaving Only These Four Reliable Indicators This analysis examines the failure of common Bitcoin prediction methods and identifies four reliable indicators for constructing a trading strategy. The author reviewed all major BTC prediction approaches from 2017-2025, categorizing them into three groups: celebrity price targets (consistently over-optimistic), analytical models like Stock-to-Flow (broken post-2022), and on-chain signals. The key finding is that more data often creates confusion, not clarity. The strategy discards unreliable elements: celebrity predictions (incentivized to be extreme), pure models (invalidated by post-ETF market changes), and the Fear & Greed Index used alone (too many false signals). Four reliable indicators were selected: 1. **MVRV Z-Score:** Accurately identifies cycle bottoms when entering its green zone (e.g., 2018, 2020, 2022). Note: Its ability to call tops is now ineffective post-2024. 2. **SOPR (28-day MA):** Consistently signals bottoms when below 1.0, indicating holders are selling at a loss. 3. **ETF Net Flow:** A crucial post-2024 metric showing institutional momentum (e.g., sustained inflows = buying). 4. **Macro Liquidity (Fed policy & M2):** Sets the overall directional bias (e.g., bullish during easing cycles). The core strategy involves waiting for a multi-signal共振 (resonance). For example, a bottom signal requires MVRV in the green zone + SOPR < 1.0. A top signal requires overheated on-chain data + sustained ETF outflows. Macro policy sets the overall direction. The Fear & Greed Index is only used as a weighted confirmatory signal, never alone. Action is only taken when three or more indicators align. The author automated this into a monitoring system that sends Telegram alerts only when signals trigger. As of the article's date (April 15, 2026), the system showed a strong bottom signal: extreme fear (F&G=12), MVRV in the buy zone, and SOPR < 1.0. The only contrary signal was weak ETF flows. Historically, such triple on-chain共振 has preceded 100%+ returns. The conclusion emphasizes building a personal framework over relying on external predictions, allowing for iterative improvement and customization based on individual risk tolerance.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片