Former JPMorgan Executive Samir Shah Joins Pantera Capital as COO

CryptoPotatoОпубликовано 2022-07-05Обновлено 2022-07-05

Введение

The former Global Head of Digital Solutions at JPMorgan -Samir Shah - will become Pantera Capital's Chief Operating Officer.

Samir Shah – who spent 12 years at JPMorgan as Global Head of Digital Solutions – announced his departure from the financial institution. His next career step includes joining the investment firm focused on cryptocurrencies – Pantera Capital – as a Chief Operating Officer (COO).
From Traditional Finance to Crypto
It is safe to say that the cryptocurrency sector has been significantly affected due to the price decline of most digital assets, including bitcoin. As a result of the panic and investor outflow, numerous companies in the field decided to lay off a chunk of their employees. The leading exchanges – CryptoCom, Coinbase, and Bybit – are among these.
Contrary to that trend, Samir Shah – a former top executive at JPMorgan – disclosed he will hop on the crypto bandwagon by joining Pantera Capital as its Chief Operating Officer. He said his 12 years at the Wall Street giant were “fantastic” and that the feeling of parting with his old team is “bittersweet.”
“JPM is a very special space, and I will be forever grateful to my colleagues for shaping my professional and personal journey in such a profound way. I leave humbled, as a very proud alum and a forever champion of the firm,” he added.
On the other hand, he displayed his excitement to take a role at Pantera Capital and join forces with its leaders – Dan Morehead and Joey Krug. Shah described the crypto firm as a leading investor in blockchain technology and vowed to take it to “new heights.”

Samir Shah, Source: Financial-Planing Pantera Capital’s Bitcoin Stance
Unlike many crypto critics, such as Paul Krugman and Richard Bernstein, who claim that bitcoin is a Ponzi scheme, in December 2021, Dan Morehead – Founder and CEO of Pantera Capital – argued that bond markets are “manipulated” by the Federal Reserve and they are the real fraudulent scheme:
“Governments should stop obsessing about Bitcoin and look inward. The biggest Ponzi scheme in history is the U.S. government and mortgage bond market – 33 trillion-with-a-T dollars – all being driven by one non-economic actor with a dominant position who is trading based on material, non-public information.”
In February this year, Pantera Capital issued a report called “The Next Mega-Trade,” in which it outlined its reasons why the primary cryptocurrency could start a bull run soon. Specifically, the company opined that the price increase should occur somewhere around April 18th (known as “Tax Day”).

Похожее

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbit32 мин. назад

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbit32 мин. назад

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit7 ч. назад

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit7 ч. назад

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手7 ч. назад

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手7 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片